Literature DB >> 22086260

Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse".

Miles Murphy1, Adam Holzberg, Heather van Raalte, Neeraj Kohli, Howard B Goldman, Vincent Lucente.   

Abstract

In July of 2011 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a safety communication entitled "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse." The stated purpose of this communication is to inform health care providers and patients that serious complications with placement of this mesh are not rare and that it is not clear that these repairs are more effective than nonmesh repair. The comments regarding efficacy are based on a systematic review of the scientific literature from 1996-2011 conducted by the FDA. Our review of the literature during this time yields some different conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of mesh use in prolapse repair. It may be useful to consider this information prior to making recommendations regarding mesh use in prolapse surgery according to the recent UPDATE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22086260     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1581-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  24 in total

1.  Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Amanda L Clark; Thomas Gregory; Virginia J Smith; Renee Edwards
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

3.  Mesh contraction: myth or reality?

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz; Max Erdmann; Ka Lai Shek
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Andrew I Sokol; Eric R Sokol; Bela I Kudish; Robert E Gutman; Joanna L Peterson; Susan Shott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eliana Duarte Lopes; Nucélio Luiz de Barros Moreira Lemos; Silvia da Silva Carramão; Jacqueline Leme Lunardelli; José Maria Cordeiro Ruano; Tsutomu Aoki; Antonio Pedro Flores Auge
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Anthony Visco; Anne M Weber; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Paul Fine; Chiara Ghetti; Morton B Brown
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Reijo Hiltunen; Kari Nieminen; Teuvo Takala; Eila Heiskanen; Mauri Merikari; Kirsti Niemi; Pentti K Heinonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John N Nguyen; Raoul J Burchette
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Carey; P Higgs; J Goh; J Lim; A Leong; H Krause; A Cornish
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  105 in total

1.  Surgery: laparoscopic promontofixation is safe and effective for POP.

Authors:  Tiffany Jackson; Arnold P Advincula
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  The mesh debate.

Authors:  Peter L Dwyer; Paul Riss
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Surgery for cystocele II: replies.

Authors:  Daniel Altman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Evaluation of current biologic meshes in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Evaluation of current synthetic mesh materials in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Prashanth Kanagarajah; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Christopher Gomez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  The rectovaginal septum: visible on magnetic resonance images of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (Müllerian agenesis).

Authors:  Markus Huebner; Katharina Rall; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Christl Reisenauer; Katja Claudia Siegmann-Luz; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Virginia Pate; Cindy L Amundsen; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Managing chronic pelvic pain following reconstructive pelvic surgery with transvaginal mesh.

Authors:  Anthony N Gyang; Jessica B Feranec; Rakesh C Patel; Georgine M Lamvu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Measures for Safe Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Preoperative Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Perioperative Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Yasushi Kotani; Kosuke Murakami; Akiko Kanto; Hisamitsu Takaya; Hidekatsu Nakai; Noriomi Matsumura
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  Conceptual framework for patient-important treatment outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Rebecca G Rogers; Matthew D Barber; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.