Literature DB >> 22429799

Robotic paediatric urology.

Marcelo A Orvieto1, Michael Large, Mohan S Gundeti.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is slowly gaining acceptance in the field of paediatric urology. Accumulating data on safety and efficacy when performing paediatric robotic urologic procedures has led paediatric urologists to gradually embrace increasingly more complex reconstructive surgeries. Indeed, the unique and delicate movements generated by the robotic system make this technology ideal for children who often require reconstructive procedures. We critically review the current role of RALS in paediatric urology and to analyse the published data, with a special emphasis on the most common applications. We also propose a structured plan to expedite training and the surgical 'learning curve'.
OBJECTIVES: To critically review the current role of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) in paediatric urology and to analyse the published data, with a special emphasis on the most common applications. One of the greatest benefits of RALS has been the ability to truly spread the application of minimally invasive surgery to paediatric surgical patients. The unique attributes of the robotic interface make this technology ideal for children with congenital anomalies, who often require reconstructive procedures. We also propose a structured plan to expedite training and the surgical 'learning curve'. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Currently, almost all urological surgical procedures in children have been performed with the assistance of the robotic interface. The most commonly performed procedures include pyeloplasty, nephrectomy/hemi-nephrectomy and surgery for vesico-ureteric reflux. Initial series of bladder augmentation and appendicovesicostomy are available.
RESULTS: Initial results with RALS are encouraging and have shown safety similar to open procedures, and outcomes at least equivalent to standard laparoscopy. Accumulating data have consistently shown that postoperative analgesia requirements and overall hospital stay are decreased. However, operative durations are significantly longer than their open counterparts, but this is decreasing as experience accumulates.
CONCLUSIONS: RALS is already part of paediatric urological surgery. Larger single-institution case series and comparative studies with the open approach and multi-institutional meta-analyses will help to identify the benefits of RALS in paediatric urology.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429799     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10877.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  15 in total

1.  Education and training in pediatric robotic surgery: lessons learned from an inaugural multinational workshop.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Erik K Mayer; Juan I Camps; Lars H Olsen; Gloria Pelizzo; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Azad S Najmaldin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-10-17

2.  Evaluation of robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  P Murthy; J A Cohn; M S Gundeti
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic reconstructive surgery in the lower urinary tract.

Authors:  Mohan S Gundeti; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Nobuhiro Haga; Kyle Kiriluk
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Urodynamic studies in spinal cord tethering.

Authors:  James T Kearns; Domenic Esposito; Beverly Dooley; David Frim; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  What are the prospects for non-scheduled robotic procedures in pediatric surgery?

Authors:  Quentin Ballouhey; Laurent Fouracde; Bernard Longis; Virginie Vacquerie; Pauline Clermidi; Véronique Carcauzon Couvrat; Jérôme Cros; Daniel Berenguer
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-03-19

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison between pediatric and adult patients-Japanese series.

Authors:  Kentaro Mizuno; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Satoshi Kurokawa; Hideyuki Kamisawa; Hidenori Nishio; Yoshinobu Moritoki; Akihiro Nakane; Tetsuji Maruyama; Atsushi Okada; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri; Takahiro Yasui; Yutaro Hayashi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-08-06

7.  Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices.

Authors:  Carlo C Passerotti; Felipe Franco; Julio C C Bissoli; Bruno Tiseo; Caio M Oliveira; Carlos A O Buchalla; Gustavo N C Inoue; Arzu Sencan; Aydin Sencan; Rogerio Ruscitto do Pardo; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  A comparison of robotic surgery in children weighing above and below 15.0 kg: size does not affect surgery success.

Authors:  Quentin Ballouhey; Thierry Villemagne; Jérôme Cros; Caroline Szwarc; Karim Braik; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy; Laurent Fourcade
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALMA).

Authors:  Olufenwa Famakinwa; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Patient positioning and port placement for robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Charles Chang; Zoe Steinberg; Anup Shah; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.