Literature DB >> 26994773

What are the prospects for non-scheduled robotic procedures in pediatric surgery?

Quentin Ballouhey1, Laurent Fouracde2, Bernard Longis2, Virginie Vacquerie2, Pauline Clermidi2, Véronique Carcauzon Couvrat2, Jérôme Cros3, Daniel Berenguer3.   

Abstract

Robotic technology allows for the management of complex surgical cases with a minimally invasive approach. The aim of this study was to communicate our experience using robotic technology for non-scheduled pediatric procedures (NSP). We performed a prospective study over the last 5 years including all consecutive cases where surgery was performed with a robot. NSP procedures were defined as a time to surgery of <24 h. Preoperative time, operative time, overall completion rate, and postoperative course were analyzed. Of the 85 cases recorded, five corresponded to robot-assisted NSP with a mean weight of 10 kg (3-36 kg). The mean time before surgery was 19 h (11-24 h). Conversion rate to open procedure was 40 %. Fifteen NSP had to be performed without robotic plateform. Robotic surgery is a potentially relevant option for most pediatric thoracic or abdominal procedures performed in a non-scheduled setting and offers technical advantages.

Keywords:  Children; Non-scheduled procedures; Pediatrics; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994773     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0574-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  15 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery in children.

Authors:  P K Tam
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  [Total endoscopic Nissen fundoplication with the robotic device "da Vinci" in children. Hemodynamics, gas exchange, and anesthetic management].

Authors:  D Meininger; C Byhahn; B H Markus; K Heller; K Westphal
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Karl Storz Lecture. Ten years of maturation of endoscopic surgery in children. Is the wine good?

Authors:  N M A Bax
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Robotic repair of congenital duodenal atresia: a case report.

Authors:  John J Meehan
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 5.  Pediatric robotic surgery: early assessment.

Authors:  Goedele van Haasteren; Susan Levine; Winifred Hayes
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Is laparoscopy safe and effective in nontraumatic acute abdomen?

Authors:  Carlo Caruso; Marco La Torre; Bruno Benini; Marco Catani; Francesco Crafa; Antonio De Leo; Tiziano Neri; Marco Sacchi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 7.  Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula repair: review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesca Astra Borruto; Pietro Impellizzeri; Angela Simona Montalto; Pietro Antonuccio; Emanuela Santacaterina; Gianfranco Scalfari; Francesco Arena; Carmelo Romeo
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.191

8.  Laparoscopy in infants and children.

Authors:  L L Leape; M L Ramenofsky
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 9.  Robot-assisted surgery: current status evaluation in abdominal and urological pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Yann Chaussy; François Becmeur; Hubert Lardy; Didier Aubert
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.878

10.  Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  John J Meehan; Anthony Sandler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.