Literature DB >> 30863913

Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.

V Mendes1,2, Franck Bruyere3,4, Jean Michel Escoffre5, Aurelien Binet3,6, Hubert Lardy3,6, Henri Marret7,3, Frederic Marchal8, Thomas Hebert7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery (LS) may lead to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and an increase in physical and mental workloads to the surgeon. Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) should improve the ergonomy of the surgeon. This study assesses the experience influence in surgical ergonomics between LS and RAS.
METHODS: LS and RAS lasting more than 60 min of effective operative time were compared. During the surgical procedure, the physical discomfort was evaluated using the Borg scale. At the end, the mental workload was evaluated using the NASA-TLX index. After global analysis, the experienced and young surgeons were assessed.
RESULTS: 88 RAS and 82 LS were evaluated. During LS, the physical discomfort was significantly higher in all segments, and the pain increased significantly during the procedure in all segments compared to that evaluated in the RAS (p < 0.05). Forearms and the back were the most painful. The young surgeons did not display any improvement in the physical ergonomics of the RAS compared to the LS. Concerning the mental ergonomics, the overall workload and performance were significantly greater during the LS compared to the RAS (p < 0.05). For the young surgeons, the overall workload, the effort, the mental and the physical demands were greater during LS (p < 0.05). For the experienced surgeons, the physical demand was lower during the RAS compared to the LS (p < 0.05). However, the experienced surgeons expressed a feeling of greater performance after the LS (p < 0.01). RAS significantly reduces the onset of MSDs compared to LS, especially for the experienced surgeons.
CONCLUSION: RAS significantly reduces the onset of MSDs compared to LS, especially for the experienced surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borg scale; Ergonomics; Laparoscopic surgery; NASA-TLX index; Robot-assisted surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30863913     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00933-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  23 in total

1.  The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery.

Authors:  Garth H Ballantyne; Fred Moll
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 2.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Martina Klein; Eric Schommer; David D Thiel; Srinivas Samavedi; Anup Kumar; Raymond J Leveillee; Raju Thomas; Julio M Pow-Sang; Li-Ming Su; Engy Mui; Roger Smith; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-01-11

4.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee; Tameka Clanton; Tamera Clanton; Erica Sutton; Adrian E Park; Michael R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Fikre Wang; James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Ahmed M Zihni; Ikechukwu Ohu; Jaime A Cavallo; Sohyung Cho; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon's physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  N Hubert; M Gilles; K Desbrosses; J P Meyer; J Felblinger; J Hubert
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  Work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in pediatric minimally invasive surgery: a multicentric survey comparing laparoscopic and sils ergonomy.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Azad Najmaldin; Felix Schier; Atsuyuki Yamataka; Marcelo Ferro; Giovanna Riccipetitoni; Piotr Czauderna; Todd Ponsky; Holger Till; Maria Escolino; Marianna Iaquinto; Antonio Marte; Amulya Saxena; Alessandro Settimi; Steve Rothenberg
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Does a robotic surgery approach offer optimal ergonomics to gynecologic surgeons?: a comprehensive ergonomics survey study in gynecologic robotic surgery.

Authors:  Mija Ruth Lee; Gyusung Isaiah Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Are Surgeons Working Smarter or Harder? A Systematic Review Comparing the Physical and Mental Demands of Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Seohyun Park; Feiyang Pan; Daniel Steffens; Jane Young; Jonathan Hong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgeons' workload assessment during indocyanine-assisted deep endometriosis surgery using the surgery task load index: The impact of the learning curve.

Authors:  Emanuela Spagnolo; Ignacio Cristóbal Quevedo; Sara Gortázar de Las Casas; Ana López Carrasco; Maria Carbonell López; Isabel Pascual Migueláñez; Alicia Hernández Gutiérrez
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 3.  Should All Minimal Access Surgery Be Robot-Assisted? A Systematic Review into the Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Demands of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Abdul Shugaba; Joel E Lambert; Theodoros M Bampouras; Helen E Nuttall; Christopher J Gaffney; Daren A Subar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Robotic Anxiety-Parents' Perception of Robot-Assisted Pediatric Surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ammer; Laura Sophie Mandt; Isabelle Christine Silbersdorff; Fritz Kahl; York Hagmayer
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.