Literature DB >> 22426873

Anatomic and functional outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without posterior colporrhaphy.

Daniel J Kaser1, Erron L Kinsler, Todd A Mackenzie, Paul Hanissian, Kris Strohbehn, James L Whiteside.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The optimal surgery for combined apical and posterior vaginal prolapse is not well defined. Our objective was to examine the anatomic and functional outcomes following sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with or without posterior colporrhaphy (PC).
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 258 women who underwent abdominal (n = 62) or laparoscopic (n = 196) SCP with or without PC. Preoperative anatomic support and standardized bowel symptoms were compared to 6-week and 1-year postoperative values, using Student's t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively.
RESULTS: Six-week follow-up data were available for 235 of 258 (91.1 %) women, while 125 of 258 (48.4 %) women had 1-year anatomic and functional outcomes recorded. While the SCP + PC group had worse posterior descent and bowel function preoperatively, there were no significant differences in postoperative anatomic support or symptoms. Long-term pelvic floor function was similar, as measured by three validated instruments. Reduction in the proportion of women with splinting was greater in the SCP + PC group.
CONCLUSIONS: SCP with or without PC is associated with improved posterior support and decreased obstructive and irritative bowel symptoms at 1 year in women with apical and posterior prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22426873     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1695-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  12 in total

1.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and anatomy and function of the posterior compartment.

Authors:  K Baessler; B Schuessler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Tristi W Muir; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Catherine S Bradley; Ingrid E Nygaard; Morton B Brown; Robert E Gutman; Kimberly S Kenton; William E Whitehead; Patricia S Goode; Patricia A Wren; Chiara Ghetti; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The natural history of posterior vaginal wall support after abdominal sacrocolpopexy with and without posterior colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Jane L Yau; David D Rahn; Donald D McIntire; Joseph I Schaffer; Clifford Y Wai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A M Weber; M D Walters; M R Piedmonte
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function.

Authors:  M A Kahn; S L Stanton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-01

7.  Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  G W Cundiff; R L Harris; K Coates; V H Low; R C Bump; W A Addison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Cundiff; Dee Fenner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; J F Wyman; S A Shumaker; D K McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Measuring the impact of a posterior compartment procedure on symptoms of obstructed defecation and posterior vaginal compartment anatomy.

Authors:  Cara L Grimes; Rosanna H Overholser; Ronghui Xu; Jasmine Tan-Kim; Charles W Nager; Keisha Y Dyer; Shawn A Menefee; Gouri B Diwadkar; Emily S Lukacz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Does concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele reduce the risk of surgical failure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy?

Authors:  Olivia H Chang; Emily R W Davidson; Tonya N Thomas; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Cecile A Ferrando
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy or hysteropexy and transobturator tape combined with native tissue repair of the vaginal compartments in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.

Authors:  Ivan Ignjatovic; Milan Potic; Dragoslav Basic; Ljubomir Dinic; Aleksandar Skakic
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.894

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.