Literature DB >> 9423734

Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse.

G W Cundiff1, R L Harris, K Coates, V H Low, R C Bump, W A Addison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess a modification of abdominal sacral colpopexy in 19 patients. STUDY
DESIGN: The rectovaginal space was dissected to the superior aspect of the posterior vaginal fascia still contiguous with the perineal body. Mersilene (Ethicon, Somerville, N.J.) mesh was sutured to this fascia and along the entire posterior vaginal wall. Patients with vault prolapse, perineal descent, and associated rectoceles or enteroceles are reported. Outcome measures included bowel symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse staging. Defecography was performed in three patients. Wilcoxon signed rank analysis was used for comparison of prolapse measures.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 11 weeks. Bowel symptoms improved in 8 of 11 women. No subjects had greater than stage II prolapse postoperatively and median improvement in stage was 3 (range 2 to 4). The mean decrease in the genital hiatus measurement was 3.13 +/- 1.25 (range 2 to 6) cm. Postoperative defecography documented correction of rectoceles and enteroceles and improvement in perineal descent with straining.
CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy is effective surgery for vaginal vault prolapse associated with perineal descent and posterior vaginal defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9423734     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70074-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  32 in total

1.  An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl-Prolene mesh.

Authors:  Y N Lim; Ajay Rane; R Muller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-09-25

2.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Kaven Baessler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-19

4.  Surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy with cadaveric fascia lata.

Authors:  W Thomas Gregory; Lesley N Otto; John O Bergstrom; Amanda L Clark
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-01-12

5.  Histological features of the rectovaginal septum in elderly women and a proposal for posterior vaginal defect repair.

Authors:  Ichiro Nagata; Gen Murakami; Daisuke Suzuki; Kenichi Furuya; Masayasu Koyama; Aiji Ohtsuka
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-01

6.  Levator bowl volume during straining and its relationship to other levator measures.

Authors:  Lahari Nandikanti; Anne G Sammarco; Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Functional Disorders: Rectocele.

Authors:  W Conan Mustain
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 8.  Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony J Woodruff; Christopher C Roth; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A rat hysteropexy model for evaluating adhesion formation and comparison of two different structured meshes.

Authors:  Ayse Filiz Gokmen-Karasu; Serdar Aydin; Fatma Cavide Sonmez; Ilknur Adanir; Gulsah Ilhan; Seda Ates
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.