Literature DB >> 32897460

Laparoscopic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy or hysteropexy and transobturator tape combined with native tissue repair of the vaginal compartments in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.

Ivan Ignjatovic1, Milan Potic2, Dragoslav Basic2, Ljubomir Dinic2, Aleksandar Skakic2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to evaluate hysterectomized and non-hysterectomized patients with prolapse and incontinence. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSHP) and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (LMSCP) were done in combination with transobturator tape (TOT) and native tissue repair of the anterior and posterior vaginal compartments in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and occult, stress, or urinary incontinence (SUI). The hypothesis is that both methods are successful.
METHODS: A total of 81 patients with POP were evaluated: 44 had vaginal vault prolapse (POPQ points Ba, C, and Bp were 1.2, 2.6, and 0.4, respectively) and 37 had uterine prolapse (POPQ points Ba, C, and Bp were 1.8, 1.7, and 1.3, respectively). LMSCP (which means less dissection of the vagina in its upper third and avoiding possible collision with the ureters anteriorly or the rectum posteriorly) was performed in patients with vault prolapse, whereas patients with uterine prolapse underwent LSHP. Transobturator tape (TOT) was placed in all patients to treat symptomatic and occult urinary incontinence. Systematic anterior and posterior colporrhaphy was performed in both groups.
RESULTS: Both groups showed anatomic (p < 0.0001) and symptomatic improvement (p < 0.001-p < 0.05). Voiding was significantly improved after surgery without postoperative incontinence (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding duration of surgery (p = 0.06), hospital stay (p = 0.13), blood loss (0.83), Clavien-Dindo grade 3 (p = 0.87), and Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 (p = 0.92) complications.
CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive LSCP or LSHP combined with TOT and native tissue repair of the anterior and posterior vaginal compartment is a successful treatment for POP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior colporrhaphy; Laparoscopic hysteropexy; Laparoscopic minimally invasive colposacropexy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Posterior colporrhaphy; Transobturator tape

Year:  2020        PMID: 32897460     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04519-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  23 in total

1.  Anatomic and functional outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without posterior colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Daniel J Kaser; Erron L Kinsler; Todd A Mackenzie; Paul Hanissian; Kris Strohbehn; James L Whiteside
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Perineorrhaphy: commonly performed yet poorly understood. A survey of surgeons.

Authors:  Gregory Kanter; Peter C Jeppson; Brenna Lynn McGuire; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 10 years' experience.

Authors:  Helen Jefferis; Natalia Price; Simon Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Occult stress incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  C Reena; A N Kekre; N Kekre
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  What's new in the functional anatomy of pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  Safety of Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Sacropexy for Cystocele Repair: Results of the Prosthetic Pelvic Floor Repair Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Lucot; Michel Cosson; Georges Bader; Philippe Debodinance; Cherif Akladios; Delphine Salet-Lizée; Patrick Delporte; Denis Savary; Philippe Ferry; Xavier Deffieux; Sandrine Campagne-Loiseau; Renaud de Tayrac; Sébastien Blanc; Sandrine Fournet; Arnaud Wattiez; Richard Villet; Marion Ravit; Bernard Jacquetin; Xavier Fritel; Arnaud Fauconnier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Apical Vaginal Support: The Often Forgotten Piece of the Puzzle.

Authors:  Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 May-Jun

Review 10.  Long-term outcomes of TOT and TVT procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Marco Soligo; Vincenzo Li Marzi; Alex Digesu; Maurizio Serati
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  1 in total

1.  The feasibility of pelvic floor training to treat urinary incontinence in women with breast cancer: a telehealth intervention trial.

Authors:  Udari N Colombage; Sze-Ee Soh; Kuan-Yin Lin; Jennifer Kruger; Helena C Frawley
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.307

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.