Literature DB >> 17466678

The natural history of posterior vaginal wall support after abdominal sacrocolpopexy with and without posterior colporrhaphy.

Jane L Yau1, David D Rahn, Donald D McIntire, Joseph I Schaffer, Clifford Y Wai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the degree of posterior vaginal wall support after abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) with and without a posterior colporrhaphy as a function of time. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review was performed on women who underwent ASC between 1997 and 2004. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) points Ap and Bp and stage of posterior compartment were collected at initial visit and at 1, 4, 10, 22, and 34 months after ASC.
RESULTS: Significant improvement of POP-Q point Ap and Bp and stage of posterior compartment was initially seen after ASC with or without posterior colporrhaphy. With concomitant posterior colporrhaphy, the improvement in Ap persisted 34 months after surgery. Mean Bp and stage of the posterior compartment returned to preoperative values after 10 months, regardless of whether a concurrent posterior colporrhaphy had been performed. Fifty-one of 191 women (29%) had subsequent stage 2 posterior wall prolapse, 4 (2%) of whom underwent subsequent posterior colporrhaphy.
CONCLUSIONS: For ASC with concomitant posterior colporrhaphy, POP-Q point Ap significantly improved and persisted at 34 months after surgery. Ten months after surgery, descent of POP-Q point Bp returned to preoperative levels and was the same regardless of whether a site-specific posterior colporrhaphy was performed at the time of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466678     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

1.  Anatomic and functional outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without posterior colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Daniel J Kaser; Erron L Kinsler; Todd A Mackenzie; Paul Hanissian; Kris Strohbehn; James L Whiteside
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; LaVonne Kots; Gloria Ryu; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE.

Authors:  Cara L Grimes; Emily S Lukacz; Marie G Gantz; Lauren Klein Warren; Linda Brubaker; Halina M Zyczynski; Holly E Richter; J Eric Jelovsek; Geoffrey Cundiff; Paul Fine; Anthony G Visco; Min Zhang; Susan Meikle
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.