Literature DB >> 8275374

The assessment of vertebral bone macroarchitecture with X-ray computed tomography.

M J Flynn1, D D Cody.   

Abstract

On a macroscopic scale, the structural characteristics of whole bone are likely dependent on the distribution of typically applied loads to the bone surface, the full bone shape, the thickness of the cortex at the various surface positions, and the distribution of cancellous bone material. X-ray computed tomography is presently the best available method for assessing the macroarchitecture of bone in-vivo. Fine detail, three-dimensional CT methods are available to measure regional bone mineral density (rBMD) in contiguously spaced small volumes and have been applied to the assessment of macroarchitecture in vertebrae. The more detailed rBMD methods produce radiation exposures to the subject similar to lumbar radiography and substantially higher than traditional QCT. The cancellous bone within lumbar vertebral bodies has been found in cross-sectional studies to have increased density in the inferior, posterior and lateral regions. Notably, regions with higher density at age 40 have a larger decline with age. The vertebral body cortex declines with age at a slower rate than observed for cancellous bone; however, the decline with age of cortical bone appears to vary substantially amongst subjects. The amount of cortical bone in the anterior portion of the body is less than in the lateral portion, which may explain previous discrepancies in assessing the fraction of vertebral body bone in the cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8275374     DOI: 10.1007/bf01673430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  40 in total

1.  The distribution and anisotropy of the stiffness of cancellous bone in the human patella.

Authors:  P R Townsend; P Raux; R M Rose; R E Miegel; E L Radin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Global and regional variations in the spinal trabecular bone: single and dual energy examinations.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; E Brown
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Local differences in mineral content in vertebral trabecular bone measured by dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  J Nepper-Rasmussen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Variations in strength and structure of cancellous bone at the knee.

Authors:  J C Behrens; P S Walker; H Shoji
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  S D Rockoff; E Sweet; J Bleustein
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1969

6.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R J McBroom; W C Hayes; W T Edwards; R P Goldberg; A A White
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur.

Authors:  T D Brown; A B Ferguson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-06

8.  Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

Authors:  A F Heuck; J Block; C C Glueer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Identification of women at risk for developing postmenopausal osteoporosis with vertebral fractures: role of history and single photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M Kleerekoper; E Peterson; D Nelson; B Tilley; E Phillips; M A Schork; J Kuder
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1989-09

10.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Overview of osteoporosis: pathophysiology and determinants of bone strength.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Micro-computed tomography study of the subchondral bone of the vertebral endplates in a porcine model: correlations with histomorphometric parameters.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Laffosse; Charles Kinkpe; Anne Gomez-Brouchet; Franck Accadbled; Eric Viguier; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Pascal Swider
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Advances in the noninvasive assessment of bone density, quality, and structure.

Authors:  H K Genant; T F Lang; K Engelke; T Fuerst; C Glüer; S Majumdar; M Jergas
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Role of cortical bone in hip fracture.

Authors:  Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2017-01-13

5.  A review of anatomical and mechanical factors affecting vertebral body integrity.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Alison M Greig; John D Wark; Nicola L Fazzalari; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.