PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway mutation or activation state and rapamycin-induced feedback loop activation of Akt is associated with rapamycin sensitivity or resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cancer cell lines were tested for rapamycin sensitivity, Akt phosphorylation, and mTOR target inhibition. Mice injected with breast or neuroendocrine cancer cells and patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) were treated with rapalogs and Akt phosphorylation was assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one cell lines were rapamycin sensitive (RS) and 12 were relatively rapamycin resistant (RR; IC(50) > 100 nmol/L). Cells with PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations were more likely to be RS (P = 0.0123). Akt phosphorylation (S473 and T308) was significantly higher in RS cells (P < 0.0001). Rapamycin led to a significantly greater pathway inhibition and greater increase in p-Akt T308 (P < 0.0001) and p-Akt S473 (P = 0.0009) in RS cells. Rapamycin and everolimus significantly increased Akt phosphorylation but inhibited growth in an in vivo NET model (BON). In patients with NETs treated with everolimus and octreotide, progression-free survival correlated with p-Akt T308 in pretreatment (R = 0.4762, P = 0.0533) and on-treatment tumor biopsies (R = 0.6041, P = 0.0102). Patients who had a documented partial response were more likely to have an increase in p-Akt T308 with treatment compared with nonresponders (P = 0.0146). CONCLUSION: PIK3CA/PTEN genomic aberrations and high p-Akt levels are associated with rapamycin sensitivity in vitro. Rapamycin-mediated Akt activation is greater in RS cells, with a similar observation in patients with clinical responses on exploratory biomarker analysis; thus feedback loop activation of Akt is not a marker of resistance but rather may function as an indicator of rapamycin activity.
PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway mutation or activation state and rapamycin-induced feedback loop activation of Akt is associated with rapamycin sensitivity or resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Cancer cell lines were tested for rapamycin sensitivity, Akt phosphorylation, and mTOR target inhibition. Mice injected with breast or neuroendocrine cancer cells and patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) were treated with rapalogs and Akt phosphorylation was assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one cell lines were rapamycin sensitive (RS) and 12 were relatively rapamycin resistant (RR; IC(50) > 100 nmol/L). Cells with PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations were more likely to be RS (P = 0.0123). Akt phosphorylation (S473 and T308) was significantly higher in RS cells (P < 0.0001). Rapamycin led to a significantly greater pathway inhibition and greater increase in p-AktT308 (P < 0.0001) and p-Akt S473 (P = 0.0009) in RS cells. Rapamycin and everolimus significantly increased Akt phosphorylation but inhibited growth in an in vivo NET model (BON). In patients with NETs treated with everolimus and octreotide, progression-free survival correlated with p-AktT308 in pretreatment (R = 0.4762, P = 0.0533) and on-treatment tumor biopsies (R = 0.6041, P = 0.0102). Patients who had a documented partial response were more likely to have an increase in p-AktT308 with treatment compared with nonresponders (P = 0.0146). CONCLUSION:PIK3CA/PTEN genomic aberrations and high p-Akt levels are associated with rapamycin sensitivity in vitro. Rapamycin-mediated Akt activation is greater in RS cells, with a similar observation in patients with clinical responses on exploratory biomarker analysis; thus feedback loop activation of Akt is not a marker of resistance but rather may function as an indicator of rapamycin activity.
Authors: David Luyimbazi; Argun Akcakanat; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Li Zhang; Gopal Singh; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Huiqin Chen; Kim-Anh Do; Yuhuan Zheng; Mien-Chie Hung; Gordon B Mills; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Raoul Tibes; Yihua Qiu; Yiling Lu; Bryan Hennessy; Michael Andreeff; Gordon B Mills; Steven M Kornblau Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Dos D Sarbassov; Siraj M Ali; Shomit Sengupta; Joon-Ho Sheen; Peggy P Hsu; Alex F Bagley; Andrew L Markhard; David M Sabatini Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2006-04-06 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: George V Thomas; Steve Horvath; Bradley L Smith; Katherine Crosby; Lori A Lebel; Matthew Schrage; Jonathan Said; Jean De Kernion; Robert E Reiter; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: James C Yao; Alexandria T Phan; David Z Chang; Robert A Wolff; Kenneth Hess; Sanjay Gupta; Carmen Jacobs; Jeannette E Mares; Andrea N Landgraf; Asif Rashid; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Bryan T Hennessy; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Aysegul Sahin; Wenbin Liu; Zhenlin Ju; Mark S Carey; Simen Myhre; Corey Speers; Lei Deng; Russell Broaddus; Ana Lluch; Sam Aparicio; Powel Brown; Lajos Pusztai; W Fraser Symmans; Jan Alsner; Jens Overgaard; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kevin R Coombes; Gordon B Mills Journal: Clin Proteomics Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 3.988