Literature DB >> 24570936

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in assessing living liver donors biliary anatomy: opportunities and challenges.

Rossano Girometti1, Umberto Baccarani2.   

Abstract

Year:  2013        PMID： 24570936      PMCID： PMC3924672          DOI： 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2012.12.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN： 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

Review 1.  CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree.

Authors:  T Hyodo; S Kumano; F Kushihata; M Okada; M Hirata; T Tsuda; Y Takada; T Mochizuki; T Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative assessment of living liver donors.

Authors:  Mustafa Sirvanci; Cihan Duran; Ersin Ozturk; Deniz Balci; Murat Dayangaç; Levent Onat; Yildiray Yüzer; Yaman Tokat; Refik Killi
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.605

3.  MR cholangiography for evaluation of hilar branching anatomy in transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor.

Authors:  Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Sungmin Myoung; Mi-Suk Park; Jin-Young Choi; Jin-Sub Choi; Soon Il Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: intraindividual comparison of MR cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; Jae Ho Byun; Seung Soo Lee; Seong Ho Park; Yun-Jin Jang; Moon-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Inaccurate preoperative imaging assessment on biliary anatomy not increases biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Xuyong Wei; Qi Ling; Kai Wang; Haiwei Bao; Haiyang Xie; Lin Zhou; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  Biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Shao Fa Wang; Zhi Yong Huang; Xiao Ping Chen
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography in living donor liver transplantation: comparison of preenhanced and post-gadolinium-enhanced methods.

Authors:  H-J Chiang; H-W Hsu; P-C Chen; H-W Chiang; T-L Huang; T-Y Chen; C-L Chen; Y-F Cheng
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation: comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with standard T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of donor biliary anatomy.

Authors:  Perdita Wietzke-Braun; Felix Braun; Dieter Muller; Thomas Lorf; Burckhardt Ringe; Giuliano Ramadori
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  MRI for evaluation of potential living liver donors: a new approach including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography.

Authors:  S Mangold; C Bretschneider; M Fenchel; A Seeger; U Kramer; B Klumpp; S Nadalin; A Königsrainer; C D Claussen; S Miller
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2012-04

10.  Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography.

Authors:  Vivian S Lee; Glenn A Krinsky; Carol A Nazzaro; Jerry S Chang; James S Babb; Jennifer C Lin; Glyn R Morgan; Lewis W Teperman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 11.105
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.