Literature DB >> 11376256

CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study.

M R Callstrom1, C D Johnson, J G Fletcher, J E Reed, D A Ahlquist, W S Harmsen, K Tait, L A Wilson, K E Corcoran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate methods for contrast material labeling of stool in the unprepared colon for computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine their sensitivity for polyp detection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with suspected or known polyps were assigned to five groups. Two to seven doses of 225 mL of dilute contrast material were orally administered during 24 or 48 hours. Transverse CT images were assessed for effectiveness of stool labeling. Colonoscopy was performed in all patients and was the standard. Two radiologists blinded to prior imaging and colonoscopic results assessed polyp detection.
RESULTS: For each group, average stool labeling scores and ranges were as follows: 24 hour two dose, 16% and 8%-21%; 24 hour five dose, 53% and 27%-66%; 48 hour four dose, 38% and 22%-48%; 48 hour six dose, 68% and 54%-77%; and 48 hour seven dose, 88% and 75%-98%. Sensitivity for the two radiologists for the identification of patients with polyps 1 cm or larger for each group was as follows: 24 hour two dose, 50% and 67%; 24 hour five dose, 100% and 100%; 48 hour four dose, 58% and 75%; 48 hour six dose, 56% and 67%; and 48 hour seven dose, 100% and 80%.
CONCLUSION: Ingestion of contrast material adequately labels stool for lesion identification; a 48-hour lead time and multiple doses of contrast material are required. Sensitivity for polyp detection in patients with adequate stool labeling approaches the sensitivity for polyp detection in prepared colons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376256     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn22693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  45 in total

1.  Automated image-based colon cleansing for laxative-free CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection.

Authors:  Marius George Linguraru; Neil Panjwani; Joel G Fletcher; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Use of computed tomography in the management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cher Heng Tan; Revathy Iyer
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

3.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of translucency rendering to differentiate polyps from pseudopolyps at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  A Guerrisi; D Marin; A Laghi; M Di Martino; F Iafrate; R Iannaccone; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Colonoscopy vs CT colonography to screen for colorectal neoplasia in average-risk patients.

Authors:  J M Hardacre; J L Ponsky; M E Baker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  An EM approach to MAP solution of segmenting tissue mixture percentages with application to CT-based virtual colonoscopy.

Authors:  Su Wang; Lihong Li; Harris Cohen; Seth Mankes; John J Chen; Zhengrong Liang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Shungo Endo; Tamaki Ichikawa; Keisuke Dasai; Katsuyuki Moriya; Tamio Kushihashi; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography.

Authors:  Aytekin Oto; Veli Gelebek; Berna Sayan Oguz; Bülent Sivri; Ahmet Deger; Okan Akhan; Aytekin Besim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.

Authors:  Jacob Thomas; Jeffrey Carenza; Elizabeth McFarland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.