Literature DB >> 22419007

Risk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after oesophageal resection.

Fergus Noble1, Nathan Curtis, Scott Harris, Jamie J Kelly, Ian S Bailey, James P Byrne, Timothy J Underwood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A simple score to define a patient's risk of developing major complications would be beneficial.
METHODS: Patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal resections with an oesophageal anastomosis between 2005 and 2010 were reviewed and formed the development dataset with resections performed in 2011 forming a prospective validation dataset. The association between post-operative C-reactive protein (CRP), white cell count (WCC) and albumin levels with anastomotic leak (AL) or major complication including death using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification were analysed by receiver operating characteristic curves. After multivariate analysis, from the development dataset, these factors were combined to create a novel score which was subsequently tested on the validation dataset.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients were assessed to develop the score. Sixty-three patients (25%) developed a major complication, and there were seven (2.7%) in-patient deaths. Twenty-six (10%) patients were diagnosed with AL at median post-operative day 7 (range: 5-15). CRP (p = 0.002), WCC (p < 0.0001) and albumin (p = 0.001) were predictors of AL. Combining these markers improved prediction of AL (NUn score > 10: sensitivity 95%, specificity 49%, diagnostic accuracy 0.801 (95% confidence interval: 0.692-0.909, p < 0.0001)). The validation dataset confirmed these findings (NUn score > 10: sensitivity 100%, specificity 57%, diagnostic accuracy 0.879 (95% CI 0.763-0.994, p = 0.014)) and a major complication or death (NUn > 10: sensitivity 89%, specificity 63%, diagnostic accuracy 0.856 (95% CI 0.709-1, p = 0.001)).
CONCLUSIONS: Blood-borne markers of the systemic inflammatory response are predictors of AL and major complications after oesophageal resection. When combined they may categorise a patient's risk of developing a serious complication with higher sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22419007     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1867-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  37 in total

Review 1.  Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infective complications following elective colorectal resection.

Authors:  G J MacKay; R G Molloy; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach.

Authors:  M Sierzega; P Kolodziejczyk; J Kulig
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Effects of immediate postoperative enteral nutrition on body composition, muscle function, and wound healing.

Authors:  D Schroeder; L Gillanders; K Mahr; G L Hill
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracies in outpatients and hospitalized patients of D-dimer testing for the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  John E Schrecengost; Robin D LeGallo; James C Boyd; Karel G M Moons; Steven L Gonias; C Edward Rose; David E Bruns
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious postoperative complications in rectal surgery.

Authors:  T Welsch; S A Müller; A Ulrich; A Kischlat; U Hinz; P Kienle; M W Büchler; J Schmidt; B M Schmied
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  H Bartels; H J Stein; J R Siewert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Outcomes following oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database.

Authors:  Daniel P Park; Catherine A Welch; David A Harrison; Thomas R Palser; David A Cromwell; Fang Gao; Derek Alderson; Katherine M Rowan; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Ewen A Griffiths; Maurizio Nestori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 2.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Individual risk modelling for esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  John M Findlay; Richard S Gillies; Bruno Sgromo; Robert E K Marshall; Mark R Middleton; Nicholas D Maynard
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Feeding Challenges in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancers.

Authors:  Daniel Reim; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-01-08

5.  Residual Recurrent Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy is Associated with Preoperative Lower Serum Albumin.

Authors:  Makoto Miyamoto; Yoshiki Kobayashi; Eri Miyata; Tomofumi Sakagami; Masao Yagi; Akira Kanda; Taku Michiura; Koichi Tomoda
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Masayuki Watanabe; Satoshi Ida; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Ryuichi Karashima; Shiro Iwagami; Yu Imamura; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  The successful use of simple tube duodenostomy in large duodenal perforations from varied etiologies.

Authors:  Onur C Kutlu; Steven Garcia; Sharmila Dissanaike
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-12-28

8.  Preoperative Nutritional Assessment by Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) is Useful to estimate Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Hironobu Shigaki; Kazuto Harada; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Junji Kurashige; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Keisuke Kosumi; Ryuma Tokunaga; Yu Imamura; Satoshi Ida; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Chien-Sheng Huang; Yu-Chung Wu; Teh-Ying Chou; Wen-Hu Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in both neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy case: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Jae Kil Park; Jae Jun Kim; Seok Whan Moon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.