Daniel Reim1, Helmut Friess1. 1. Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing treatment for esophagogastric or esophageal cancer are exposed to a considerably high risk of malnutrition due to early obstruction of the gastrointestinal passage. Presently most of the patients undergo modern multimodal therapies which require chemoradiation or chemotherapy ahead of surgery. Therefore reconstruction of the obstructed gastrointestinal passage is considerably delayed. Surgery as the only curative option after neoadjuvant treatment is the mainstay of therapy in this setting. However, many patients are at risk for the development of postoperative complications associated with the complexity of the surgical procedure. Therefore enteral feeding as a prerequisite to avoid malnutrition represents a special therapeutic challenge. SUMMARY: This review describes the recent literature on the incidence and influence of perioperative malnutrition on oncologic outcome, measures to determine patients at risk, possible strategies to reduce or avoid malnutrition by supportive enteral/parenteral nutrition, implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery programs and feeding routes, but also surgical and adjuvant procedures in the curative and palliative setting for patients undergoing treatment for gastroesophageal cancers. KEY MESSAGES: Appropriate identification of patients at risk is crucial to avoid malnutrition. Early nutritional interventions during multimodal/neoadjuvant treatment may be beneficial for weight loss reduction although the evidence is not conclusive. Pouch reconstructions during surgery should be applied in order to increase quality of life and eating capacity. Reduction of postoperative complications could provide potential benefits. In palliative patients, insertion of self-expanding metal stents can reduce dysphagia and improve quality of life, but does not prolong overall survival. Further evidence is required to determine the value of the procedures and measures described in this review. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nutritional risk scoring should be performed for every gastroesophageal cancer patient. Sophisticated reconstruction methods and early recovery programs should be enforced to reduce perioperative starvation periods. Self-expanding metal stents should be used for palliative patients.
BACKGROUND:Patients undergoing treatment for esophagogastric or esophageal cancer are exposed to a considerably high risk of malnutrition due to early obstruction of the gastrointestinal passage. Presently most of the patients undergo modern multimodal therapies which require chemoradiation or chemotherapy ahead of surgery. Therefore reconstruction of the obstructed gastrointestinal passage is considerably delayed. Surgery as the only curative option after neoadjuvant treatment is the mainstay of therapy in this setting. However, many patients are at risk for the development of postoperative complications associated with the complexity of the surgical procedure. Therefore enteral feeding as a prerequisite to avoid malnutrition represents a special therapeutic challenge. SUMMARY: This review describes the recent literature on the incidence and influence of perioperative malnutrition on oncologic outcome, measures to determine patients at risk, possible strategies to reduce or avoid malnutrition by supportive enteral/parenteral nutrition, implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery programs and feeding routes, but also surgical and adjuvant procedures in the curative and palliative setting for patients undergoing treatment for gastroesophageal cancers. KEY MESSAGES: Appropriate identification of patients at risk is crucial to avoid malnutrition. Early nutritional interventions during multimodal/neoadjuvant treatment may be beneficial for weight loss reduction although the evidence is not conclusive. Pouch reconstructions during surgery should be applied in order to increase quality of life and eating capacity. Reduction of postoperative complications could provide potential benefits. In palliative patients, insertion of self-expanding metal stents can reduce dysphagia and improve quality of life, but does not prolong overall survival. Further evidence is required to determine the value of the procedures and measures described in this review. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nutritional risk scoring should be performed for every gastroesophageal cancerpatient. Sophisticated reconstruction methods and early recovery programs should be enforced to reduce perioperative starvation periods. Self-expanding metal stents should be used for palliative patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Esophageal cancer; Feeding challenges; Gastroesophageal cancer
Authors: Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: R Brägelmann; U Armbrecht; D Rosemeyer; B Schneider; W Zilly; R W Stockbrügger Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 2.566
Authors: Marian A E van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren; Patrícia Realino Guaitoli; Elise P Jansma; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Gordon S Doig; Fiona Simpson; Elizabeth A Sweetman; Simon R Finfer; D Jamie Cooper; Philippa T Heighes; Andrew R Davies; Michael O'Leary; Tom Solano; Sandra Peake Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David P Kelsen; Katryn A Winter; Leonard L Gunderson; Joanne Mortimer; Norman C Estes; Daniel G Haller; Jaffer A Ajani; Walter Kocha; Bruce D Minsky; Jack A Roth; Christopher G Willett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas Crosby; Christopher N Hurt; Stephen Falk; Simon Gollins; Somnath Mukherjee; John Staffurth; Ruby Ray; Nadim Bashir; John A Bridgewater; J Ian Geh; David Cunningham; Jane Blazeby; Rajarshi Roy; Tim Maughan; Gareth Griffiths Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Anna Gillman; Michelle Hayes; Greg Sheaf; Margaret Walshe; John V Reynolds; Julie Regan Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jeffrey B Velotta; Jennifer R Dusendang; Hyunjee Kwak; Michelle Huyser; Ashish Patel; Simon K Ashiku; Lisa J Herrinton Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Kate Furness; Catherine E Huggins; Lauren Hanna; Mary Anne Silvers; Paul Cashin; Liang Low; Daniel Croagh; Terry P Haines Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 4.430