Literature DB >> 27403411

Feeding Challenges in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancers.

Daniel Reim1, Helmut Friess1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing treatment for esophagogastric or esophageal cancer are exposed to a considerably high risk of malnutrition due to early obstruction of the gastrointestinal passage. Presently most of the patients undergo modern multimodal therapies which require chemoradiation or chemotherapy ahead of surgery. Therefore reconstruction of the obstructed gastrointestinal passage is considerably delayed. Surgery as the only curative option after neoadjuvant treatment is the mainstay of therapy in this setting. However, many patients are at risk for the development of postoperative complications associated with the complexity of the surgical procedure. Therefore enteral feeding as a prerequisite to avoid malnutrition represents a special therapeutic challenge.
SUMMARY: This review describes the recent literature on the incidence and influence of perioperative malnutrition on oncologic outcome, measures to determine patients at risk, possible strategies to reduce or avoid malnutrition by supportive enteral/parenteral nutrition, implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery programs and feeding routes, but also surgical and adjuvant procedures in the curative and palliative setting for patients undergoing treatment for gastroesophageal cancers. KEY MESSAGES: Appropriate identification of patients at risk is crucial to avoid malnutrition. Early nutritional interventions during multimodal/neoadjuvant treatment may be beneficial for weight loss reduction although the evidence is not conclusive. Pouch reconstructions during surgery should be applied in order to increase quality of life and eating capacity. Reduction of postoperative complications could provide potential benefits. In palliative patients, insertion of self-expanding metal stents can reduce dysphagia and improve quality of life, but does not prolong overall survival. Further evidence is required to determine the value of the procedures and measures described in this review. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nutritional risk scoring should be performed for every gastroesophageal cancer patient. Sophisticated reconstruction methods and early recovery programs should be enforced to reduce perioperative starvation periods. Self-expanding metal stents should be used for palliative patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Feeding challenges; Gastroesophageal cancer

Year:  2016        PMID: 27403411      PMCID: PMC4924457          DOI: 10.1159/000442907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors        ISSN: 2296-3774


  61 in total

1.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Screening of the nutritional risk of patients with gastric carcinoma before operation by NRS 2002 and its relationship with postoperative results.

Authors:  Weiping Guo; Guangsheng Ou; Xi Li; Jianglong Huang; Jiangpei Liu; Hongbo Wei
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 3.  Should oesophageal stents be used before neo-adjuvant therapy to treat dysphagia in patients awaiting oesophagectomy? Best evidence topic (BET).

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  The effect of pancreatic enzyme supplementation in patients with steatorrhoea after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  R Brägelmann; U Armbrecht; D Rosemeyer; B Schneider; W Zilly; R W Stockbrügger
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 5.  Nutrition screening tools: does one size fit all? A systematic review of screening tools for the hospital setting.

Authors:  Marian A E van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren; Patrícia Realino Guaitoli; Elise P Jansma; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gordon S Doig; Fiona Simpson; Elizabeth A Sweetman; Simon R Finfer; D Jamie Cooper; Philippa T Heighes; Andrew R Davies; Michael O'Leary; Tom Solano; Sandra Peake
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Significant host- and tumor-related factors for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Masanori Ikeda; Shoji Natsugoe; Shinichi Ueno; Masamichi Baba; Takashi Aikou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  David P Kelsen; Katryn A Winter; Leonard L Gunderson; Joanne Mortimer; Norman C Estes; Daniel G Haller; Jaffer A Ajani; Walter Kocha; Bruce D Minsky; Jack A Roth; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yingxue Dai; Chaoying Li; Yao Xie; Xudong Liu; Jianxin Zhang; Jing Zhou; Xiongfei Pan; Shujuan Yang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-30

10.  Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): a multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial.

Authors:  Thomas Crosby; Christopher N Hurt; Stephen Falk; Simon Gollins; Somnath Mukherjee; John Staffurth; Ruby Ray; Nadim Bashir; John A Bridgewater; J Ian Geh; David Cunningham; Jane Blazeby; Rajarshi Roy; Tim Maughan; Gareth Griffiths
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted Esophageal Bypass for T4b Esophageal Tumor as a Bridge to Definitive Therapy.

Authors:  Spyridon Davakis; Athanasios Syllaios; Efstratia Mpaili; Theodoros Liakakos; Alexandros Charalabopoulos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Pancreatic Cancer-Induced Cachexia and Relevant Mouse Models.

Authors:  Sally E Henderson; Neil Makhijani; Thomas A Mace
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 3.  The Role of Prehabilitation in Modern Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Augustinas Bausys; Morta Mazeikaite; Klaudija Bickaite; Bernardas Bausys; Rimantas Bausys; Kestutis Strupas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Disentangling the obesity paradox in upper gastrointestinal cancers: Weight loss matters more than body mass index.

Authors:  Shria Kumar; Nadim Mahmud; David S Goldberg; Jashodeep Datta; David E Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Vorinostat-eluting poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) nanofiber-coated stent for inhibition of cholangiocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Tae Won Kwak; Hye Lim Lee; Yeon Hui Song; Chan Kim; Jungsoo Kim; Sol-Ji Seo; Young-Il Jeong; Dae Hwan Kang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-10-17

6.  Attitudes of Australian Patients Undergoing Treatment for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers to Different Models of Nutrition Care Delivery: Qualitative Investigation.

Authors:  Kate Furness; Catherine Elizabeth Huggins; Helen Truby; Daniel Croagh; Terry Peter Haines
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-03-12

7.  Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Gillman; Michelle Hayes; Greg Sheaf; Margaret Walshe; John V Reynolds; Julie Regan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Velotta; Jennifer R Dusendang; Hyunjee Kwak; Michelle Huyser; Ashish Patel; Simon K Ashiku; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  A process and mechanism of action evaluation of the effect of early and intensive nutrition care, delivered via telephone or mobile application, on quality of life in people with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a study protocol.

Authors:  Kate Furness; Catherine E Huggins; Lauren Hanna; Mary Anne Silvers; Paul Cashin; Liang Low; Daniel Croagh; Terry P Haines
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Selection and optimization of nutritional risk screening tools for esophageal cancer patients in China.

Authors:  Wen Dong; Xiguang Liu; Shunfang Zhu; Di Lu; Kaican Cai; Ruijun Cai; Qing Li; Jingjing Zeng; Mei Li
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.926

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.