Literature DB >> 22418568

Agreement in risk prediction between the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX®) and the PAM50 breast cancer intrinsic Classifier™ in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Catherine M Kelly1, Philip S Bernard, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Bailiang Wang, Mark T W Ebbert, Roy R L Bastien, Kenneth M Boucher, Elliana Young, Takayuki Iwamoto, Lajos Pusztai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare risk assignment by PAM50 Breast Cancer Intrinsic Classifier™ and Oncotype DX_Recurrence Score (RS) in the same population.
METHODS: RNA was extracted from 151 estrogen receptor (ER)+ stage I-II breast cancers and gene expression profiled using PAM50 "intrinsic" subtyping test.
RESULTS: One hundred eight cases had complete molecular information; 103 (95%) were classified as luminal A (n = 76) or luminal B (n = 27). Ninety-two percent (n = 98) had a low (n = 59) or intermediate (n = 39) RS. Among luminal A cancers, 70% had low (n = 53) and the remainder (n = 23) had an intermediate RS. Among luminal B cancers, nine were high (33%) and 13 were intermediate (48%) by the RS. Almost all cancers with a high RS were classified as luminal B (90%, n = 9). One high RS cancer was identified as basal-like and had low ER/ESR1 and low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in both assays. The majority of low RS cases were luminal A (83%, n = 53). Importantly, half of the intermediate RS cancers were re-categorized as low risk luminal A subtype by PAM50.
CONCLUSION: There is good agreement between the two assays for high (i.e., luminal B or RS > 31) and low (i.e., luminal B or RS < 18) prognostic risk assignment but PAM50 assigns more patients to the low risk category. About half of the intermediate RS group was reclassified as luminal A by PAM50.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22418568      PMCID: PMC3336833          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  22 in total

1.  Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-06

2.  St. Gallen 2011: Summary of the Consensus Discussion.

Authors:  Michael Gnant; Nadia Harbeck; Christoph Thomssen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting.

Authors:  James L Khatcheressian; Antonio C Wolff; Thomas J Smith; Eva Grunfeld; Hyman B Muss; Victor G Vogel; Francine Halberg; Mark R Somerfield; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  [Validation and clinical application of MammaPrint® in patients with breast cancer].

Authors:  Marta Cuadros; Aurora Llanos
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.725

Review 5.  Genomic Grade Index: An important tool for assessing breast cancer tumor grade and prognosis.

Authors:  Otto Metzger Filho; Michail Ignatiadis; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Utility of oncotype DX risk estimates in clinically intermediate risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-normal, grade II, lymph node-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Catherine M Kelly; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Giampaolo Bianchini; Jennifer K Litton; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Analysis of the MammaPrint breast cancer assay in a predominantly postmenopausal cohort.

Authors:  Ben S Wittner; Dennis C Sgroi; Paula D Ryan; Tako J Bruinsma; Annuska M Glas; Anitha Male; Sonika Dahiya; Karleen Habin; Rene Bernards; Daniel A Haber; Laura J Van't Veer; Sridhar Ramaswamy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Mammostrat as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy.

Authors:  John M S Bartlett; Jeremy Thomas; Douglas T Ross; Robert S Seitz; Brian Z Ring; Rodney A Beck; Hans Christian Pedersen; Alison Munro; Ian H Kunkler; Fiona M Campbell; Wilma Jack; Gillian R Kerr; Laura Johnstone; David A Cameron; Udi Chetty
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Systematic bias in genomic classification due to contaminating non-neoplastic tissue in breast tumor samples.

Authors:  Fathi Elloumi; Zhiyuan Hu; Yan Li; Joel S Parker; Margaret L Gulley; Keith D Amos; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.063

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  High-risk estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: identification and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Rosemary L Balleine; Nicholas R Wilcken
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 2.  Signatures of breast cancer metastasis at a glance.

Authors:  George S Karagiannis; Sumanta Goswami; Joan G Jones; Maja H Oktay; John S Condeelis
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Breast Cancer Biomarkers: Utility in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Fanny Le Du; Naoto T Ueno; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2013-12

4.  13th st. Gallen international breast cancer conference 2013: primary therapy of early breast cancer evidence, controversies, consensus - opinion of a german team of experts (zurich 2013).

Authors:  Michael Untch; Bernd Gerber; Nadia Harbeck; Christian Jackisch; Norbert Marschner; Volker Möbus; Gunter von Minckwitz; Sibylle Loibl; Matthias W Beckmann; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Serban-Dan Costa; Thomas Decker; Ingo Diel; Thomas Dimpfl; Wolfgang Eiermann; Tanja Fehm; Klaus Friese; Fritz Jänicke; Wolfgang Janni; Walter Jonat; Marion Kiechle; Uwe Köhler; Hans-Joachim Lück; Nicolai Maass; Kurt Possinger; Achim Rody; Anton Scharl; Andreas Schneeweiss; Christoph Thomssen; Diethelm Wallwiener; Anja Welt
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Expression of the MHC Class II Pathway in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumor Cells Is Associated with a Good Prognosis and Infiltrating Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Andres Forero; Yufeng Li; Dongquan Chen; William E Grizzle; Katherine L Updike; Natalie D Merz; Erinn Downs-Kelly; Todd C Burwell; Christos Vaklavas; Donald J Buchsbaum; Richard M Myers; Albert F LoBuglio; Katherine E Varley
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.151

6.  Molecular subtyping predicts pathologic tumor response in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus capecitabine with or without trastuzumab chemotherapy.

Authors:  Soley Bayraktar; Melanie Royce; Lisette Stork-Sloots; Femke de Snoo; Stefan Glück
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  P Sinn; S Aulmann; R Wirtz; S Schott; F Marmé; Z Varga; A Lebeau; H Kreipe; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Intrinsic subtypes from PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer cohort: differences by age, race, and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Philip S Bernard; Rachel E Factor; Marilyn L Kwan; Laurel A Habel; Charles P Quesenberry; Kaylynn Shakespear; Erin K Weltzien; Inge J Stijleman; Carole A Davis; Mark T W Ebbert; Adrienne Castillo; Lawrence H Kushi; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Clinical integration of next-generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  R R Gullapalli; M Lyons-Weiler; P Petrosko; R Dhir; M J Becich; W A LaFramboise
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.