Literature DB >> 24521995

Intrinsic subtypes from PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer cohort: differences by age, race, and tumor characteristics.

Carol Sweeney1, Philip S Bernard, Rachel E Factor, Marilyn L Kwan, Laurel A Habel, Charles P Quesenberry, Kaylynn Shakespear, Erin K Weltzien, Inge J Stijleman, Carole A Davis, Mark T W Ebbert, Adrienne Castillo, Lawrence H Kushi, Bette J Caan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking to describe gene expression-based breast cancer intrinsic subtype patterns for population-based patient groups.
METHODS: We studied a diverse cohort of women with breast cancer from the Life After Cancer Epidemiology and Pathways studies. RNA was extracted from 1 mm punches from fixed tumor tissue. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR was conducted for the 50 genes that comprise the PAM50 intrinsic subtype classifier.
RESULTS: In a subcohort of 1,319 women, the overall subtype distribution based on PAM50 was 53.1% luminal A, 20.5% luminal B, 13.0% HER2-enriched, 9.8% basal-like, and 3.6% normal-like. Among low-risk endocrine-positive tumors (i.e., estrogen and progesterone receptor positive by immunohistochemistry, HER2 negative, and low histologic grade), only 76.5% were categorized as luminal A by PAM50. Continuous-scale luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and normal-like scores from PAM50 were mutually positively correlated. Basal-like score was inversely correlated with other subtypes. The proportion with non-luminal A subtype decreased with older age at diagnosis, P Trend < 0.0001. Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, African American women were more likely to have basal-like tumors, age-adjusted OR = 4.4 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.3-8.4], whereas Asian and Pacific Islander women had reduced odds of basal-like subtype, OR = 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3-0.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that over 50% of breast cancers treated in the community have luminal A subtype. Gene expression-based classification shifted some tumors categorized as low risk by surrogate clinicopathologic criteria to higher-risk subtypes. IMPACT: Subtyping in a population-based cohort revealed distinct profiles by age and race. ©2014 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24521995      PMCID: PMC4011983          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  50 in total

1.  Under-representation of older adults in cancer registration trials: known problem, little progress.

Authors:  Kevin S Scher; Arti Hurria
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Utility of prognostic genomic tests in breast cancer practice: The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Consensus Statement.

Authors:  H A Azim; S Michiels; F Zagouri; S Delaloge; M Filipits; M Namer; P Neven; W F Symmans; A Thompson; F André; S Loi; C Swanton
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Maggie Chon U Cheang; Miguel Martín; Joel S Parker; Eva Carrasco; Rosalía Caballero; Scott Tyldesley; Karen Gelmon; Philip S Bernard; Torsten O Nielsen; Charles M Perou
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Body size and risk of luminal, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Kathleen E Malone; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies.

Authors:  Fiona M Blows; Kristy E Driver; Marjanka K Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling; Maggie C Cheang; Karen Gelmon; Torsten O Nielsen; Carl Blomqvist; Päivi Heikkilä; Tuomas Heikkinen; Heli Nevanlinna; Lars A Akslen; Louis R Bégin; William D Foulkes; Fergus J Couch; Xianshu Wang; Vicky Cafourek; Janet E Olson; Laura Baglietto; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Catriona A McLean; Melissa C Southey; Emad Rakha; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Mark E Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska; William F Anderson; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Malcolm W R Reed; Elena Provenzano; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Alison M Dunning; Manjeet Humphreys; Douglas F Easton; Montserrat García-Closas; Carlos Caldas; Paul D Pharoah; David Huntsman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Reproductive and hormonal risk factors for postmenopausal luminal, HER-2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Kathleen E Malone; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Molecular profiling currently offers no more than tumour morphology and basic immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Characterization of uncertainty in the classification of multivariate assays: application to PAM50 centroid-based genomic predictors for breast cancer treatment plans.

Authors:  Mark Tw Ebbert; Roy Rl Bastien; Kenneth M Boucher; Miguel Martín; Eva Carrasco; Rosalía Caballero; Inge J Stijleman; Philip S Bernard; Julio C Facelli
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2011-12-23

Review 9.  Microarrays in the 2010s: the contribution of microarray-based gene expression profiling to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo; Fernanda Milanezi; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  PAM50 breast cancer subtyping by RT-qPCR and concordance with standard clinical molecular markers.

Authors:  Roy R L Bastien; Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure; Mark T W Ebbert; Aleix Prat; Blanca Munárriz; Leslie Rowe; Patricia Miller; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Daniel Anderson; Bradley Lyons; Isabel Álvarez; Tracy Dowell; David Wall; Miguel Ángel Seguí; Lee Barley; Kenneth M Boucher; Emilio Alba; Lisa Pappas; Carole A Davis; Ignacio Aranda; Christiane Fauron; Inge J Stijleman; José Palacios; Antonio Antón; Eva Carrasco; Rosalía Caballero; Matthew J Ellis; Torsten O Nielsen; Charles M Perou; Mark Astill; Philip S Bernard; Miguel Martín
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.063

View more
  56 in total

1.  Anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations in premenopausal women and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Donna D Baird; Frank Z Stanczyk; Anne Z Steiner; Melissa A Troester; Kristina W Whitworth; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-04-14

Review 2.  The Importance of Body Composition in Explaining the Overweight Paradox in Cancer-Counterpoint.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Candyce H Kroenke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Reparameterization of PAM50 Expression Identifies Novel Breast Tumor Dimensions and Leads to Discovery of a Genome-Wide Significant Breast Cancer Locus at 12q15.

Authors:  Michael J Madsen; Stacey Knight; Carol Sweeney; Rachel Factor; Mohamed Salama; Inge J Stijleman; Venkatesh Rajamanickam; Bryan E Welm; Sasi Arunachalam; Brandt Jones; Rakesh Rachamadugu; Kerry Rowe; Melissa H Cessna; Alun Thomas; Lawrence H Kushi; Bette J Caan; Philip S Bernard; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Racial disparity in breast cancer: can it be mattered for prognosis and therapy.

Authors:  Vijayalaxmi Gupta; Inamul Haque; Jinia Chakraborty; Stephanie Graff; Snigdha Banerjee; Sushanta K Banerjee
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.782

5.  Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality by Molecular Subtype: Statewide Age and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in New Jersey.

Authors:  Aishwarya Kulkarni; Antoinette M Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Stephanie M Hill; Jesse J Plascak; Adana A M Llanos
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2019-08-19

6.  Exercise and Prognosis on the Basis of Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The LACE and Pathways Studies.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Marilyn L Kwan; Erin Weltzien; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Barbara Sternfeld; Carol Sweeney; Philip S Bernard; Adrienne Castillo; Laurel A Habel; Candyce H Kroenke; Bryan M Langholz; Charles P Queensberry; Chau Dang; Britta Weigelt; Lawrence H Kushi; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Intrinsic subtypes from the PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer survivor cohort: prognostication of short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Carol Sweeney; Laurel A Habel; Marilyn L Kwan; Candyce H Kroenke; Erin K Weltzien; Charles P Quesenberry; Adrienne Castillo; Rachel E Factor; Lawrence H Kushi; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Family Study Designs Informed by Tumor Heterogeneity and Multi-Cancer Pleiotropies: The Power of the Utah Population Database.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Claire L Leiser; Michael J Madsen; John Gardner; Stacey Knight; Melissa Cessna; Carol Sweeney; Jennifer A Doherty; Ken R Smith; Philip S Bernard; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Impact of race, ethnicity, and BMI on achievement of pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a pooled analysis of four prospective Alliance clinical trials (A151426).

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Karla V Ballman; Carrie Strand; Judy C Boughey; Aman U Buzdar; Lisa A Carey; William M Sikov; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Racial Differences in PAM50 Subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Melissa A Troester; Xuezheng Sun; Emma H Allott; Joseph Geradts; Stephanie M Cohen; Chiu-Kit Tse; Erin L Kirk; Leigh B Thorne; Michelle Mathews; Yan Li; Zhiyuan Hu; Whitney R Robinson; Katherine A Hoadley; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; H Shelton Earp; Andrew F Olshan; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.