Literature DB >> 22411825

Soluble oligomerization provides a beneficial fitness effect on destabilizing mutations.

Shimon Bershtein1, Wanmeng Mu, Wanmeng Wu, Eugene I Shakhnovich.   

Abstract

Mutations create the genetic diversity on which selective pressures can act, yet also create structural instability in proteins. How, then, is it possible for organisms to ameliorate mutation-induced perturbations of protein stability while maintaining biological fitness and gaining a selective advantage? Here we used site-specific chromosomal mutagenesis to introduce a selected set of mostly destabilizing mutations into folA--an essential chromosomal gene of Escherichia coli encoding dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)--to determine how changes in protein stability, activity, and abundance affect fitness. In total, 27 E. coli strains carrying mutant DHFR were created. We found no significant correlation between protein stability and its catalytic activity nor between catalytic activity and fitness in a limited range of variation of catalytic activity observed in mutants. The stability of these mutants is strongly correlated with their intracellular abundance, suggesting that protein homeostatic machinery plays an active role in maintaining intracellular concentrations of proteins. Fitness also shows a significant correlation with intracellular abundance of soluble DHFR in cells growing at 30 °C. At 42 °C, the picture was mixed, yet remarkable: A few strains carrying mutant DHFR proteins aggregated, rendering them nonviable, but, intriguingly, the majority exhibited fitness higher than wild type. We found that mutational destabilization of DHFR proteins in E. coli is counterbalanced at 42 °C by their soluble oligomerization, thereby restoring structural stability and protecting against aggregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22411825      PMCID: PMC3323985          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118157109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  39 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the SH3 domain aggregation suggests a generic amyloidogenesis mechanism.

Authors:  Feng Ding; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Sergey V Buldyrev; H Eugene Stanley; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions.

Authors:  Misha Soskine; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The structural stability of a protein is an important determinant of its proteolytic susceptibility in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D A Parsell; R T Sauer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structural similarity enhances interaction propensity of proteins.

Authors:  D B Lukatsky; B E Shakhnovich; J Mintseris; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 6.  Insights into enzyme function from studies on mutants of dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  S J Benkovic; C A Fierke; A M Naylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution.

Authors:  D Allan Drummond; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Protein acrobatics in pairs--dimerization via domain swapping.

Authors:  Angela M Gronenborn
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity.

Authors:  Ariel Fernández; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Evolution of protein complexes by duplication of homomeric interactions.

Authors:  Jose B Pereira-Leal; Emmanuel D Levy; Christel Kamp; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  The interface of protein structure, protein biophysics, and molecular evolution.

Authors:  David A Liberles; Sarah A Teichmann; Ivet Bahar; Ugo Bastolla; Jesse Bloom; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Lucy J Colwell; A P Jason de Koning; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Julian Echave; Arne Elofsson; Dietlind L Gerloff; Richard A Goldstein; Johan A Grahnen; Mark T Holder; Clemens Lakner; Nicholas Lartillot; Simon C Lovell; Gavin Naylor; Tina Perica; David D Pollock; Tal Pupko; Lynne Regan; Andrew Roger; Nimrod Rubinstein; Eugene Shakhnovich; Kimmen Sjölander; Shamil Sunyaev; Ashley I Teufel; Jeffrey L Thorne; Joseph W Thornton; Daniel M Weinreich; Simon Whelan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Reconstructed Ancestral Enzymes Impose a Fitness Cost upon Modern Bacteria Despite Exhibiting Favourable Biochemical Properties.

Authors:  Joanne K Hobbs; Erica J Prentice; Mathieu Groussin; Vickery L Arcus
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Systematic detection of internal symmetry in proteins using CE-Symm.

Authors:  Douglas Myers-Turnbull; Spencer E Bliven; Peter W Rose; Zaid K Aziz; Philippe Youkharibache; Philip E Bourne; Andreas Prlić
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Evolutionary diversification of the multimeric states of proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Merging molecular mechanism and evolution: theory and computation at the interface of biophysics and evolutionary population genetics.

Authors:  Adrian W R Serohijos; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Biophysical principles predict fitness landscapes of drug resistance.

Authors:  João V Rodrigues; Shimon Bershtein; Anna Li; Elena R Lozovsky; Daniel L Hartl; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An in silico study of the effect of SOD1 electrostatic loop dynamics on amyloid‑like filament formation.

Authors:  Eamonn F Healy; Luis Cervantes
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 8.  Quantifying and understanding the fitness effects of protein mutations: Laboratory versus nature.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Boucher; Daniel N A Bolon; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A Simple Model of Protein Domain Swapping in Crowded Cellular Environments.

Authors:  Jaie C Woodard; Sachith Dunatunga; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Weakly stable regions and protein-protein interactions in beta-barrel membrane proteins.

Authors:  Hammad Naveed; Jie Liang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.