Literature DB >> 22410729

Recovery from forward masking in elderly cochlear implant users.

Edward R Lee1, David R Friedland, Christina L Runge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare temporal aspects of peripheral neural responses and central auditory perception between groups of younger adult and elderly cochlear implant users. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Academic hospital and cochlear implant center. PATIENTS: Adult cochlear implant users aged 28 to 57 years in the younger group (n = 5) and 61 to 89 years (n = 9) in the elderly group. All subjects used Advanced Bionics devices. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time constants of neural (i.e., electrically evoked compound action potentials [ECAPs]) and perceptual recovery from forward masking. Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were varied in both experiments.
RESULTS: ECAP recovery rates were equivalent between groups, and no correlation was found between ECAP recovery and age. No correlations were found between ECAP recovery and speech perception. Psychophysical recovery was significantly slower in the elderly compared with the younger subjects (p < 0.0005), with a significant effect of age (R2 = 0.70, p < 0.0005). At the longest ISI (240 ms), elderly subjects experienced a mean maximum threshold shift of 35.2% (relative to 1 ms ISI) versus 14.8% for younger subjects. There was a significant positive relationship between psychophysical recovery and consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores (R2 = 0.62, p < 0.001), although no relationship was found with Hearing in Noise Test sentences.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that difficulties observed in speech perception by elderly CI users may be due to age-related changes in the central rather than peripheral auditory system. With further study, these results may provide information to allow clinicians to assess patients' temporal processing abilities and facilitate setting program parameters that will maximize their auditory perceptual experience with a cochlear implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22410729     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318248ede5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

2.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

3.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Postnatal development, maturation and aging in the mouse cochlea and their effects on hair cell regeneration.

Authors:  Bradley J Walters; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Identification of acoustically similar and dissimilar vowels in profoundly deaf adults who use hearing aids and/or cochlear implants: some preliminary findings.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; Christian A Rosado; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Masking Period Patterns and Forward Masking for Speech-Shaped Noise: Age-Related Effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Denise C Menezes; Heather L Porter; Silvana Griz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Bahar S Shahsavarani; Tyler C McFayden; Haibo Wang; Katherine E Gill; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; Jianfen Luo; Ruijie Wang; Nancy He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  A novel otoferlin splice-site mutation in siblings with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Christina L Runge; Christy B Erbe; Mark T McNally; Courtney Van Dusen; David R Friedland; Anne E Kwitek; Joseph E Kerschner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Prediction of the Functional Status of the Cochlear Nerve in Individual Cochlear Implant Users Using Machine Learning and Electrophysiological Measures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Angela Pellittieri; Chloe Vaughan; Xia Ning; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.