| Literature DB >> 22408398 |
Jin-Quan Yang1, Wen-Qiao Tang1, Te-Yu Liao2, Yang Sun1, Zhuo-Cheng Zhou3, Chiao-Chuan Han4, Dong Liu1, Hung-Du Lin5.
Abstract
Phylogeographical analyses on Squalidus argentatus samples from thirteen localities within mainland China and Taiwan were conducted for biogeographic studies, as their dispersal strictly depends on geological evolution of the landmasses. A total of 95 haplotypes were genotyped for mtDNA cyt b gene in 160 specimens from nine river systems. Relatively high levels of haplotype diversity (h = 0.984) and low levels of nucleotide diversity (π = 0.020) were detected in S. argentatus. Two major phylogenetic haplotype groups, A and B, were revealed via phylogenetic analysis. The degree of intergroup divergence (3.96%) indicates that these groups diverged about 4.55 myr (million years) ago. Haplotype network and population analyses indicated significant genetic structure (F(ST) = 0.775), largely concordant with the geographical location of the populations. According to SAMOVA analysis, we divided these populations into four units: Yangtze-Pearl, Qiantang-Minjiang, Jiulong-Beijiang and Taiwan groups. Mismatch distribution analysis, neutrality tests and Bayesian skyline plots indicated a significant population expansion for lineage A and B, approximately dated 0.35 and 0.04 myr ago, respectively. We found strong geographical organization of the haplotype clades across different geographic scales that can be explained by episodes of dispersal and population expansion followed by population fragmentation and restricted gene flow.Entities:
Keywords: Mainland China; MtDNA; Squalidus argentatu; Taiwan; phylogeography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22408398 PMCID: PMC3291967 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13021405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Maps showing (a) four sub-districts proposed by Li [3]. The Pearl River Subdistrict in green, ZheMin Sub-district in purple, Taiwan Sub-district in red, Kiang-Husi Sub-district in blue, and the Lingqu Canal connecting the Yangtze and Pearl Rivers in brown; 1 = Yangtze River, 2 = Qiantang River, 3 = Oujiang, 4 = Minjiang River, 5 = Mulan River, 6 = Jiulong River, 7 = Hanjiang, 8 = Pearl River, 9 = Tamsui River; (b) thirteen sampling sites of Squalidus argentatus and four units of samples based on SAMOVA analysis: Yangtze-Pearl group (in blue), Qiantang-Minjiang group (in purple), Jiulong-Beijiang group (in yellow), and Taiwan group (in red). See Table 1 for details of sampling sites. The bold lines indicate roughly the Wuyi (WY) and Nanling Mountains (NL).
Summary of sample size, number of haplotypes, haplotype diversities (h), nucleotide diversity (π, θ), Tajima’s D and Fu’s (Fs) test, Ramos-Onsins and Rozas’ R2 and exponential growth rate (g) for mt DNA Cyt b region sequences in each population.
| Region subregion | Populations (Abbreviation) | Sample size | Haplotype numbers | Haplotype Diversity ( | Nucleotide diversity (π) | Nucleotide diversity (θ) | Tajima’s | Fu’s FS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 155 | 92 | 0.983 | 0.02073 | 0.03295 | −1.19838 | −33.072 | 0.0584 | |||
| 33 | 20 | 0.939 | 0.00659 | 0.00908 | −0.99662 | −5.021 | 0.0584 | |||
| AnHua (AH) | 8 | 8 | 1.000 | 0.00583 | 0.00677 | −0.72263 | −3.129 | 0.1136 | 1259.96 | |
| Tongren (TR) | 19 | 10 | 0.854 | 0.00214 | 0.00301 | −1.04808 | −3.859 | 0.0913 | 2180.86 | |
| ShangRao (SR) | 6 | 3 | 0.733 | 0.00140 | 0.00154 | −0.46983 | 0.615 | 0.2894 | 569.91 | |
| 31 | 25 | 0.981 | 0.00834 | 0.01998 | −2.20960 | −10.765 | 0.0584 | |||
| Kaihua (KH) | 15 | 11 | 0.933 | 0.00836 | 0.01565 | −2.01412 | −1.083 | 0.0766 | 273.56 | |
| PingYao (PY) | 16 | 14 | 0.983 | 0.00787 | 0.01005 | −0.90881 | −4.471 | 0.0998 | 666.16 | |
| Jinyun (JY) | 10 | 7 | 0.911 | 0.00823 | 0.00806 | 0.09713 | 0.724 | 0.1648 | 217.45 | |
| Shunchang (SC) | 15 | 14 | 0.990 | 0.00855 | 0.01052 | −0.79692 | −5.112 | 0.1015 | 580.04 | |
| Xianyou (XY) | 17 | 9 | 0.860 | 0.00337 | 0.00493 | −1.24407 | −1.450 | 0.0959 | 31.26 | |
| Longyan (LY) | 13 | 5 | 0.628 | 0.00490 | 0.00820 | −1.75948 | 2.843 | 0.1268 | 90.72 | |
| Jiaoling (SK) | 15 | 7 | 0.819 | 0.00459 | 0.00459 | 0.00760 | 0.878 | 0.1424 | 98.89 | |
| Xijiang River | Shaoguan (SG) | 14 | 10 | 0.890 | 0.00222 | 0.00441 | −2.04167 | −5.409 | 0.0959 | 7760.08 |
| Beijiang River | Liuzhou (LZ) | 7 | 4 | 0.714 | 0.00209 | 0.00179 | 0.82563 | 0.205 | 0.2209 | 504.63 |
| Tamsui (SD) | 5 | 3 | 0.700 | 0.00105 | 0.00126 | −1.04849 | −0.186 | 0.2667 | 9936.337 | |
| 160 | 95 | 0.984 | 0.02063 | 0.03323 | −1.22243 | −36.677 | 0.0584 | 193.36 |
Yangtze-Pearl group;
Qiantang-Minjiang group;
Jiulong-Beijiang group;
Taiwan group (SAMOVA);
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001;
g estimated with LAMARC.
Figure 2Neighbor-Joining tree of individual sequences of mtDNA cyt b gene in Squalidus argentatus. Numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap values (expressed as percentage) with 1000 replicates. Thirteen sampling sites of S. argentatus and four units of samples based on SAMOVA analysis: Yangtze-Pearl group (triangle in blue), Qiantang-Minjiang group (inverted triangle in purple), Jiulong-Beijiang group (circle in yellow), and Taiwan group (square in red). Refer to Table 1 for the abbreviations of localities.
Matrix of pairwise F (below diagonal) and P values (above diagonal) between 13 populations based on mtDNA in Squalidus argentatus. Referred to Table 1 for the abbreviations of localities.
| AH | TR | SR | KH | PY | JY | SC | XY | LY | SK | SG | LZ | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.300 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.671 | 0.858 | 0.459 | 0.126 | 0.009 | 0.036 | 0.036 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.486 | 0.693 | −0.007 | 0.027 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.427 | 0.660 | 0.053 | 0.052 | 0.162 | 0.333 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.279 | 0.600 | 0.236 | 0.150 | 0.028 | 0.162 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.410 | 0.648 | 0.098 | 0.085 | −0.001 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.661 | 0.811 | 0.251 | 0.213 | 0.194 | 0.319 | 0.246 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.845 | 0.904 | 0.904 | 0.839 | 0.835 | 0.833 | 0.829 | 0.897 | 0.243 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.848 | 0.903 | 0.905 | 0.841 | 0.837 | 0.836 | 0.831 | 0.897 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.901 | 0.939 | 0.953 | 0.877 | 0.873 | 0.880 | 0.866 | 0.931 | 0.490 | 0.463 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.364 | 0.757 | 0.814 | 0.500 | 0.457 | 0.399 | 0.442 | 0.717 | 0.882 | 0.884 | 0.939 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.441 | 0.603 | 0.919 | 0.651 | 0.629 | 0.558 | 0.611 | 0.826 | 0.893 | 0.893 | 0.949 | 0.841 |
AMOVA results for testing genetic subdivision between populations using mtDNA among four sub-districts. (1) Pearl River sub-district (populations SG and LZ); (2) ZheMin sub-district (populations KH, PY, JY, SC, XY, LY and SK); (3) Taiwan sub-district (population SD); and (4) Kiang-Husi Sub-district (populations AH, TR and SR).
| Source of variation | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|
| Among geographic district | 1.03198 | 7.96 |
| Among populations within geographic district | 9.06970 | 69.97 |
| Within populations | 2.86151 | 22.07 |
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001.
SAMOVA results for testing genetic subdivision between populations of using of mtDNA among four units. (i) Yangtze-Pearl group (populations AH, TR, SR and LZ); (ii) Qiantang-Min group (populations KH, PY, JY, SC and XY); (iii) Jiulong-Beijiang group (populations LY, SK and SG); and (iv) Taiwan group (population SD).
| Source of variation | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 9.83421 | 77.40 |
| Among populations within zoogeographic zone | 0.01060 | 0.08 |
| Within populations | 2.86151 | 22.52 |
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001.
Figure 3Mismatch-distribution analysis of Squalidus argentatus mtDNA haplotype sequences. A simulated Poisson distribution is indicated by a dotted line.
Figure 4Bayesian skyline plot of the effective population sizes through time for Squalidus argentatus.