Literature DB >> 22399110

[Therapy of male urinary incontinence: artificial sphincter versus male slings].

W Leicht1, J Thüroff.   

Abstract

Different kinds of sling systems for the therapy of male urinary incontinence have been developed during the last decade. All systems work by compressing the male urethra. There are adjustable and non-adjustable systems. Implantation is mostly a minimally invasive procedure. On the other hand the well-established AMS 800 hydraulic artificial sphincter has been available since 1972. Recently, another hydraulic artificial sphincter (FlowSecure) has become available providing a boost of occlusive pressure during stress. The aim of this review is to compare effectiveness and indications of the different techniques compared to the artificial sphincter.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22399110     DOI： 10.1007/s00120-012-2820-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN： 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  37 in total

1.  Management of stress urinary incontinence following prostate surgery with minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon implants: functional results from a single center prospective study.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Vincent Misraï; Pierre-Nicolas Gosseine; Stéphane Bart; Florence Cour; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Maude Carmel; Bechir Hage; Samer Hanna; Gerard Schmutz; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Mid-term results for the retroluminar transobturator sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ricarda M Bauer; Irina Soljanik; Claudius Füllhase; Alexander Karl; Armin Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  An adjustable sling for the treatment of all degrees of male stress urinary incontinence: retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications after a minimal followup of 14 months.

Authors:  Deirdre M Bochove-Overgaauw; Bart Ph Schrier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Objective and quality-of-life outcomes with bone-anchored male bulbourethral sling.

Authors:  Brian L Gallagher; Neil T Dwyer; Darlene M Gaynor-Krupnick; Jerilyn M Latini; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling men: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Christopher S Saigal; Lynn Stothers; David H Thom; Larissa V Rodríguez; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  New perineal bone-anchored male sling: lessons learned.

Authors:  Rahmi Onur; Atul Rajpurkar; Ajay Singla
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  [Long-term results of a phase III multicentre trial of the adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: minimum 3 years].

Authors:  Salomon V Romano; Sergio E Metrebian; Fernando Vaz; Valter Muller; Carlos A Levi D'Ancona; Eugenio A Costa de Souza; Fabio Nakamura
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.994

9.  Successful outcome of artificial urinary sphincters in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence despite adverse implantation features.

Authors:  L M Pérez; G D Webster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence--what do patients choose?

Authors:  Angelish Kumar; Elana Rosenberg Litt; Katie N Ballert; Victor W Nitti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.