Literature DB >> 17572193

Objective and quality-of-life outcomes with bone-anchored male bulbourethral sling.

Brian L Gallagher1, Neil T Dwyer, Darlene M Gaynor-Krupnick, Jerilyn M Latini, Karl J Kreder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the success rates and quality-of-life outcomes with the male bulbourethral sling using the validated Male Urogenital Distress Inventory (MUDI) and Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ). These validated incontinence questionnaires for men have not been reported in the sling population.
METHODS: A total of 31 consecutive patients underwent placement of a male bulbourethral bone-anchoring sling from October 2002 through May 2005. The preoperative information included history and physical examination, pad history, urodynamic findings, and MUDI and MUSIQ results. Postoperatively, the patients were evaluated clinically and completed a MUDI and MUSIQ every 6 months.
RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 24 completed the questionnaires and follow-up protocol. Of the other 7 patients, 4 underwent sling removal and 3 were lost to follow-up. The average follow-up time was 15 months (range 9 to 21). After surgery, the pad use decreased from a median of 3.7 pads/day (range 1 to 12) to 1.3 pads/day (range 0 to 6). Of the 24 analyzed patients, 18 (75%) were dry or using 1 pad or less per day, and 9 (38%) no longer needed pads. Subjectively, 75% of the patients were satisfied. The mean MUDI and MUSIQ scores decreased from 56.8 and 29.9 preoperatively to 44.8 (P <0.0001) and 14.6 (P = 0.002) after sling placement, respectively. When all 31 patients were included, our clinical success rate of 1 pad/day or less decreased to 58%.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the 24 patients with follow-up data, 75% were satisfied and were clinically cured. A significant improvement was seen after surgery in the MUDI and MUSIQ scores, severity of incontinence, and average pad use. The MUDI and MUSIQ scores paralleled patient satisfaction and clinical success after male bulbourethral sling placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572193     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  Suburethral slings for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Kevin V Carlson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [Therapy of male urinary incontinence: artificial sphincter versus male slings].

Authors:  W Leicht; J Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-08

Review 4.  Surgical treatment for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Chen; Pin-Hsuan Lin; Yann-Yuh Jou; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.