Literature DB >> 1404630

Successful outcome of artificial urinary sphincters in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence despite adverse implantation features.

L M Pérez1, G D Webster.   

Abstract

A total of 75 men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence underwent artificial urinary sphincter implantation with a mean followup of 3.7 years. Average patient age at implantation was 67 years, with 30 men being 70 years old or older. In only 15 men (20%) was there no adverse implantation feature, while the remainder had adverse features, such as detrusor hyperactivity (44), bladder neck or urethral stricture disease (27), previous radiation therapy (11) and metastatic prostate cancer (11). Although men with ideal implantation characteristics, men with normal detrusors and men who underwent prostatectomy for benign disease had slightly better outcome in terms of urinary continence, in general each group of men with and without adverse features had satisfactory urinary continence. Other than men with a benign prostate, who fared better, each group of men with and without adverse features had equal need for device revisions. In conclusion, men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence should not be excluded from consideration for artificial urinary sphincter implantation based on the failure to meet ideal implantation criteria provided such adverse features are recognized and appropriately addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1404630     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36850-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Gracilis muscle transposition with electrical stimulation for sphincteric incontinence: a new approach.

Authors:  M B Chancellor; J P Heesakkers; R A Janknegt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  [Therapy of male urinary incontinence: artificial sphincter versus male slings].

Authors:  W Leicht; J Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Evaluation and surgical management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

5.  [Artificial sphincter for the treatment of incontinence].

Authors:  N Djakovic; J Huber; J Nyarangi-Dix; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation and Management of the Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

Authors:  Amy D Dobberfuhl; Craig V Comiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  The treatment of stress incontinence in men: part 2 of a series of articles on incontinence.

Authors:  Christof Börgermann; Albert Kaufmann; Herbert Sperling; Manfred Stöhrer; Herbert Rübben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence: Etiology, evaluation, and management.

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-03

Review 9.  Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  S A MacDiarmid
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence.

Authors:  Rakesh Kapoor; Kamal Jeet Singh; Amit Suri; Pratipal Singh; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.