Literature DB >> 22392668

Public reporting helped drive quality improvement in outpatient diabetes care among Wisconsin physician groups.

Maureen A Smith1, Alexandra Wright, Christopher Queram, Geoffrey C Lamb.   

Abstract

Public reporting on the quality of ambulatory health care is growing, but knowledge of how physician groups respond to such reporting has not kept pace. We examined responses to public reporting on the quality of diabetes care in 409 primary care clinics within seventeen large, multispecialty physician groups. We determined that a focus on publicly reported metrics, along with participation in large or externally sponsored projects, increased a clinic's implementation of diabetes improvement interventions. Clinics were also more likely to implement interventions in more recent years. Public reporting helped drive both early implementation of a single intervention and ongoing implementation of multiple simultaneous interventions. To fully engage physician groups, accountability metrics should be structured to capture incremental improvements in quality, thereby rewarding both early and ongoing improvement activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22392668      PMCID: PMC3329125          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  17 in total

Review 1.  Organisational culture and quality of health care.

Authors:  H T Davies; S M Nutley; R Mannion
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-06

2.  Improving quality through public disclosure of performance information.

Authors:  David Lansky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Martin N Marshall; Paul G Shekelle; Huw T O Davies; Peter C Smith
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care?

Authors:  Martin N Marshall; Patrick S Romano; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 5.  Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Sumant R Ranji; Kathryn M McDonald; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Vandana Sundaram; Robert J Rushakoff; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Recommendations for client- and provider-directed interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Benefits of information technology-enabled diabetes management.

Authors:  Davis Bu; Eric Pan; Janice Walker; Julia Adler-Milstein; David Kendrick; Julie M Hook; Caitlin M Cusack; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Information technology for the treatment of diabetes: improving outcomes and controlling costs.

Authors:  Kathleen Wyne
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2008-03

Review 9.  Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Erica S Breslau; Jane G Zapka; Robert H Fletcher; David F Ransohoff; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Yee-Wei Lim; Soeren Mattke; Cheryl Damberg; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  24 in total

1.  Across the divide: "Primary care departments working together to redesign care to achieve the Triple Aim".

Authors:  Steven Koslov; Elizabeth Trowbridge; Sandra Kamnetz; Sally Kraft; Jeffrey Grossman; Nancy Pandhi
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2016-02-28

2.  Impact of State Reporting Laws on Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in U.S. Adult Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Hangsheng Liu; Carolyn T A Herzig; Andrew W Dick; E Yoko Furuya; Elaine Larson; Julie Reagan; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Assessing long-term sustainment of clinic participation in NIATx200: Results and a new methodological approach.

Authors:  James H Ford; Scott P Stumbo; James M Robinson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-06-27

4.  A statewide controlled trial intervention to reduce use of unproven or ineffective breast cancer care.

Authors:  Liliana E Pezzin; Purushottam Laud; Joan Neuner; Tina W F Yen; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Publicly reported quality-of-care measures influenced Wisconsin physician groups to improve performance.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Lamb; Maureen A Smith; William B Weeks; Christopher Queram
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Sustainability of quality improvement following removal of pay-for-performance incentives.

Authors:  Justin K Benzer; Gary J Young; James F Burgess; Errol Baker; David C Mohr; Martin P Charns; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  What influences the awareness of physician quality information? Implications for Medicare.

Authors:  Jon Christianson; Daniel Maeng; Jean Abraham; Dennis P Scanlon; Jeffrey Alexander; Jessica Mittler; Michael Finch
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-06-09

8.  Governing healthcare through performance measurement in Massachusetts and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Philip J Van der Wees; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Ewout van Ginneken; John Z Ayanian; Eric C Schneider; Gert P Westert
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Measuring patient experience: concepts and methods.

Authors:  Faraz Ahmed; Jenni Burt; Martin Roland
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Physician-Specific Variability in Spine Fusion Patients.

Authors:  Anthony Zou; Joseph Bosco; Themistocles Protopsaltis; James Slover
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.