Literature DB >> 23459733

Publicly reported quality-of-care measures influenced Wisconsin physician groups to improve performance.

Geoffrey C Lamb1, Maureen A Smith, William B Weeks, Christopher Queram.   

Abstract

Public reporting of how physicians and hospitals perform on certain quality of care measures is increasingly common, but little is known about whether such disclosures have an impact on the quality of care delivered to patients. We analyzed fourteen publicly reported quality of ambulatory care measures from 2004 to 2009 for the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality, a voluntary consortium of physician groups. We also fielded a survey of the collaborative's members and analyzed Medicare billing data to independently compare members' performance to that of providers in the rest of Wisconsin, neighboring states, and the rest of the United States. We found that physician groups in the collaborative improved their performance during the study period on many measures, such as cholesterol control and breast cancer screening. Physician groups reported on the survey that publicly reported performance data motivated them to act on some, but not all, of the quality measures. Our study suggests that large group practices will engage in quality improvement efforts in response to public reporting, especially when comparative performance is displayed, as it was in this case on the collaborative's website.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23459733      PMCID: PMC4137398          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  11 in total

1.  A survey of 92 quality improvement projects.

Authors:  F Alemi; F K Safaie; D Neuhauser
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2001-11

2.  Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.

Authors:  E H Wagner; B T Austin; C Davis; M Hindmarsh; J Schaefer; A Bonomi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?

Authors:  E H Wagner
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1998 Aug-Sep

4.  Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Improving the quality of hospital care in America.

Authors:  Patrick S Romano
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Public reporting helped drive quality improvement in outpatient diabetes care among Wisconsin physician groups.

Authors:  Maureen A Smith; Alexandra Wright; Christopher Queram; Geoffrey C Lamb
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases.

Authors:  Lawrence Casalino; Robin R Gillies; Stephen M Shortell; Julie A Schmittdiel; Thomas Bodenheimer; James C Robinson; Thomas Rundall; Nancy Oswald; Helen Schauffler; Margaret C Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement.

Authors:  Amy E Bonomi; Edward H Wagner; Russell E Glasgow; Michael VonKorff
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Yee-Wei Lim; Soeren Mattke; Cheryl Damberg; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  16 in total

1.  Association Of A Regional Health Improvement Collaborative With Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Hospitalizations.

Authors:  Joseph Tanenbaum; Randall D Cebul; Mark Votruba; Douglas Einstadter
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Monitoring and reporting hospital-acquired conditions: a federalist approach.

Authors:  Nathan West; Terry Eng
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2015-01-06

3.  A framework for guiding efforts to reward value instead of volume.

Authors:  Taylor J Christensen
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-11-07

4.  The use of decision support to measure documented adherence to a national imaging quality measure.

Authors:  Ali S Raja; Anurag Gupta; Ivan K Ip; Angela M Mills; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  State mandated public reporting and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew A Cavender; Karen E Joynt; Craig S Parzynski; Frederick S Resnic; John S Rumsfeld; Mauro Moscucci; Frederick A Masoudi; Jeptha P Curtis; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Texas Hospital's Perspectives About NICU Performance Measures: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Julie R Doherty; Andrew Schaefer; David C Goodman
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.147

7.  A statewide controlled trial intervention to reduce use of unproven or ineffective breast cancer care.

Authors:  Liliana E Pezzin; Purushottam Laud; Joan Neuner; Tina W F Yen; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: The Critical Role of Quality Measurement.

Authors:  Tracy Spinks; Patricia A Ganz; George W Sledge; Laura Levit; James A Hayman; Timothy J Eberlein; Thomas W Feeley
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-01

9.  Patients' perspectives of care and surgical outcomes in Michigan: an analysis using the CAHPS hospital survey.

Authors:  Kyle H Sheetz; Seth A Waits; Micah E Girotti; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma care: is it getting better?

Authors:  J J C Stienen; P B Ottevanger; L Wennekes; S A M van de Schans; H M Dekker; R W M van der Maazen; J H J M van Krieken; N M A Blijlevens; R P M G Hermens
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.