Literature DB >> 25493034

PolysorbR (an absorbable lactomer) staples, a safe closure technique for distal pancreatic resection.

Gyula Farkas1, László Leindler1, János Márton1, György Lázár1, Gyula Farkas1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate twenty-year experience evaluated the use of the Polysorb(R) (an absorbable lactomer) staples for distal pancreatic resection.
METHODS: The data on 150 patients [92 men, 58 women, mean age 52 (24-72) years] who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) in the last 20 years were collected prospectively from an electronic database. The diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, sonography, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. The indications for DP were focal pancreatic necrosis, spontaneous pancreatic fistulas, abscesses, pseudocysts, segmental chronic obstructive pancreatitis in the tail, traumatic disruption, and benign (cystadenomas, insulinomas, or glucagonomas) or malignant tumours. The distal resections were performed without splenectomy in 29 of the 150 patients (19%). In the event of splenectomy, the splenic artery and vein were individually ligated, the TA-55 Auto Suture stapler, loaded with Premium Polysorb(R) 55 staples (5.5 mm), was placed across the gland, and the trigger was pulled, the action of which produced two staggered absorbable suture lines. The gland distal to the stapler was then amputated with a scalpel on the TA-55 stapler and the two rows of staples were left in the proximal pancreatic stump. After the distal resection, a drainage tube was inserted into the pancreatic bed.
RESULTS: The average duration of the operation was 150 min (range: 90-210 min) and no transfusion was indicated during the operation. After DP in one patient a type B fistula was diagnosed, which was treated successfully by conservative treatment comprising of 12-d octreotide medication (3 × 0.1 mg/d) and jejunal feeding. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was therefore 0.6%. Another 2 patients suffered postoperative pancreatitis, which was also conservatively treated. Reoperations were performed in 2 patients on the first or second postoperative day, necessitated by bleeding from the retroperitoneal region. The morbidity was 3.3% (5 patients), but no mortality occurred in the postoperative period. Overall, the postoperative period was uneventful without any complications (pancreatic fistula, abscess, bleeding or wound infection) in 145 patients. The length of the postoperative stay ranged between 8 and 16 d. For the 145 patients who had no any postoperative complications, the hospital stay was 8 or 9 d. No mortality occurred in the follow-up period (6 or 12 mo postoperatively); but 6 mo after surgery one patient suffered a pseudocyst following recurrent pancreatitis and was treated with cystojejunostomy.
CONCLUSION: Our clinical results demonstrated that the application of absorbable lactomer staples for distal pancreatic resection is a safe alternative to the standard closure technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closure technique; Distal pancreatic resection; Long-term experience; Pancreatic fistula; PolysorbR staples

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25493034      PMCID: PMC4258590          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  33 in total

1.  [Closing the resection surface in left pancreatic resection with the surgical stapler].

Authors:  M Fuchs; H Köhler; A Schafmayer; H J Peiper
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 0.942

2.  Simplified distal pancreatectomy with the Auto Suture stapler: preliminary clinical observations.

Authors:  H L Pachter; R Pennington; J Chassin; F C Spencer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Experimental evaluation of absorbable copolymer staples for hysterectomy.

Authors:  R R Steckel; H W Jann; D Kaplan; R M Jakowski; A Schwartz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  [Long-term animal experiment analysis of the use of resorbable staple sutures in partial gastrectomy].

Authors:  S Walgenbach; U Lang; T Junginger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

5.  Lactomer copolymer absorbable staples in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  T Hirashima; T Eto; L DenBesten
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Bridget N Fahy; Charles F Frey; Hung S Ho; Laurel Beckett; Richard J Bold
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Management of the stump of the pancreas after distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  S Shankar; B Theis; R C Russell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

9.  Fibrin glue sealing for the prevention of pancreatic fistulas following distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Y Suzuki; Y Kuroda; A Morita; Y Fujino; Y Tanioka; T Kawamura; Y Saitoh
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-09

10.  Meta-analysis of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement and risk of fistula following pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Eric H Jensen; Pamela R Portschy; Jessica Chowaniec; Ming Teng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy with or without Preservation of the Spleen for Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Toshihiko Masui; Toshimi Kaido; Kohei Ogawa; Kentaro Yasuchika; Shintaro Yagi; Satoru Seo; Kyoichi Takaori; Masaki Mizumoto; Taku Iida; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-10-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.