Literature DB >> 22391380

Lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) on core biopsy in the NHS Breast Screening Programme: is the screening round relevant?

R J Hunt1, J R Steel, G J R Porter, C S Holgate, R M Watkins.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Most women who have screening mammography and undergo subsequent open biopsy following an indeterminate core biopsy result are eventually found to have benign disease. However, a significant number have malignant disease and the rate of malignancy in such cases may be influenced by various factors. This study examined the effect of the type of screening round (prevalent or incident) on the likelihood of breast cancer being present.
METHODS: A total of 199 women who had NHS breast screening mammograms and subsequent indeterminate (B3) core biopsy results followed by excision biopsy over an 11-year period in a single breast screening unit were reviewed.
RESULTS: The rate of malignancy following excision of a lesion graded as B3 on core biopsy was 21% for women in the prevalent screening round compared to 33% in subsequent rounds (Fisher's exact test, p=0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of malignancy associated with a B3 core biopsy result appears to be related to the screening round in which the lesion is detected, being approximately 50% higher in the subsequent incident rounds compared to the initial prevalent round. This finding may be useful in formulating management plans for women who have an indeterminate biopsy result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391380      PMCID: PMC3954131          DOI: 10.1308/003588412X13171221498460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

1.  Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions.

Authors:  Julie A Margenthaler; Deirdre Duke; Barbara S Monsees; Premsri T Barton; Chrystia Clark; Jill R Dietz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  Mijung Jang; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Jeong Seon Park; Min Hyun Seong; In Ae Park
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Effect of abnormal screening mammogram on quality of life.

Authors:  A F W van der Steeg; C M G Keyzer-Dekker; J De Vries; J A Roukema
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Accuracy and upgrade rates of percutaneous breast biopsy: the surgeon's role.

Authors:  Windy Olaya; Won Bae; Jan Wong; Jasmine Wong; Sharmila Roy-Chowdhury; Kevork Kazanjian; Sharon Lum
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Predictive value of breast lesions of "uncertain malignant potential" and "suspicious for malignancy" determined by needle core biopsy.

Authors:  Mary F Dillon; Enda W McDermott; Arnold D Hill; Ann O'Doherty; Niall O'Higgins; Cecily M Quinn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Management of lobular carcinoma in-situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia of the breast--a review.

Authors:  M Hussain; G H Cunnick
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Predictive value of needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening.

Authors:  M E El-Sayed; E A Rakha; J Reed; A H S Lee; A J Evans; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Papillomas and atypical papillomas in breast core needle biopsy specimens: risk of carcinoma in subsequent excision.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Robert P Derhagopian; Dolores M Tizol-Blanco; Edwin W Gould
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Screen-detected breast lesions with an indeterminate (B3) core needle biopsy should be excised.

Authors:  B Lieske; D Ravichandran; A Alvi; D A S Lawrence; D J Wright
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 4.424

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Is mode of presentation of B3 breast core biopsies (screen-detected or symptomatic) a distinguishing factor in the final histopathologic result or risk of diagnosis of malignancy?

Authors:  Gael M Maclean; Stephen P Courtney; Hilary Umeh; Siriathan Sanjeev; Colin McCormick; Brendan M Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications.

Authors:  Gisela Lg Menezes; Gonneke Ao Winter-Warnars; Eva L Koekenbier; Emma J Groen; Helena M Verkooijen; Ruud M Pijnappel
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy System: No Innovation Without Evaluation.

Authors:  Sherif Monib; Soumitra Mukerji; Sonia Narula
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.