Literature DB >> 16978969

Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions.

Julie A Margenthaler1, Deirdre Duke, Barbara S Monsees, Premsri T Barton, Chrystia Clark, Jill R Dietz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to compare the prevalence of invasive or in situ cancer at excisional biopsy in patients with image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB)-proven atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), or lobular carcinoma-in-situ (LCIS). Factors affecting the upgrade rate to malignancy were also identified.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ADH, ALH, or LCIS on image-guided CNB (stereotactic or ultrasound) from 1995 to 2005 were identified through radiologic and surgical databases. Patients who subsequently underwent excisional biopsy of their lesion were included in the study. The imaging, medical records, and pathology of these patients were reviewed.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with either ADH (61/96, 63%), ALH (19/96, 20%), or LCIS (16/96, 17%) on image-guided CNB proceeded to excisional biopsy. Malignancy was detected on excisional biopsy in 31% of patients with ADH, 16% of patients with ALH, and 25% of patients with LCIS. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, parity, hormonal status, or previous benign breast biopsies. The presence of a mass on mammography was associated with an increased upgrade rate to malignancy, while biopsies performed using vacuum-assisted devices, larger gauge biopsy needles, and greater number of cores were associated with a lower upgrade rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that excisional biopsy is warranted in all patients with CNB diagnoses of ADH, ALH, or LCIS to exclude the presence of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978969     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

1.  B3 Lesions: Radiological Assessment and Multi-Disciplinary Aspects.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Jörg Nährig; Astrid Hacker; Stefan Sedlacek; Heinz Höfler
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Impact of atypical hyperplasia at margins of breast-conserving surgery on the recurrence of breast cancer.

Authors:  Shunrong Li; Jieqiong Liu; Yaping Yang; Yunjie Zeng; Heran Deng; Haixia Jia; Qian Li; Huiyi Feng; Yangyang Li; Erwei Song; Qiang Liu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) on core biopsy in the NHS Breast Screening Programme: is the screening round relevant?

Authors:  R J Hunt; J R Steel; G J R Porter; C S Holgate; R M Watkins
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Pharmacokinetic mapping for lesion classification in dynamic breast MRI.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Glen R Morrell; Karen Y Oh; Cheryl A Walczak; R Brad Barlow; Leigh A Neumayer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Long-Term Safety of Observation in Selected Women Following Core Biopsy Diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Rhiana S Menen; Nivetha Ganesan; Therese Bevers; Jun Ying; Robin Coyne; Deanna Lane; Constance Albarracin; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Surgical outcomes of borderline breast lesions detected by needle biopsy in a breast screening program.

Authors:  Karen M Flegg; Jeffrey J Flaherty; Anne M Bicknell; Sanjiv Jain
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Diagnostic value of radiomics and machine learning with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia in predicting malignant upgrade.

Authors:  Roberto Lo Gullo; Kerri Vincenti; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Peter Gibbs; Michael J Fox; Isaac Daimiel; Danny F Martinez; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth A Morris; Jeffrey S Reiner; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  High-risk lesions of the breast: concurrent diagnostic tools and management recommendations.

Authors:  Francesca Catanzariti; Daly Avendano; Giuseppe Cicero; Margarita Garza-Montemayor; Carmelo Sofia; Emmanuele Venanzi Rullo; Giorgio Ascenti; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Maria Adele Marino
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-05-26

9.  Mapping breast tissue types by miniature radio-frequency near-field spectroscopy sensor in ex-vivo freshly excised specimens.

Authors:  Zvi Kaufman; Haim Paran; Ilana Haas; Patricia Malinger; Tania Zehavi; Tamar Karni; Izhak Pappo; Judith Sandbank; Judith Diment; Tanir Allweis
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  The significance of lobular neoplasia on needle core biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  S Menon; G J R Porter; A J Evans; I O Ellis; C W Elston; Z Hodi; A H S Lee
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.