Literature DB >> 22390502

Health behavior change: can genomics improve behavioral adherence?

Colleen M McBride1, Angela D Bryan, Molly S Bray, Gary E Swan, Eric D Green.   

Abstract

The National Human Genome Research Institute recommends pursuing "genomic information to improve behavior change interventions" as part of its strategic vision for genomics. The limited effectiveness of current behavior change strategies may be explained, in part, by their insensitivity to individual variation in adherence responses. The first step in evaluating whether genomics can inform customization of behavioral recommendations is evidence reviews to identify adherence macrophenotypes common across behaviors and individuals that have genetic underpinnings. Conceptual models of how biological, psychological, and environmental factors influence adherence also are needed. Researchers could routinely collect biospecimens and standardized adherence measurements of intervention participants to enable understanding of genetic and environmental influences on adherence, to guide intervention customization and prospective comparative effectiveness studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390502      PMCID: PMC3487676          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  43 in total

Review 1.  Substance use disorders: realizing the promise of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Kent E Hutchison
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

2.  A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; James O Prochaska; Joseph S Rossi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Alcohol and tobacco advertising in black and general audience newspapers: targeting with message cues?

Authors:  Elisia L Cohen; Charlene A Caburnay; Shelly Rodgers
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-05-24

4.  CHRNA4 and tobacco dependence: from gene regulation to treatment outcome.

Authors:  Kent E Hutchison; David L Allen; Francesca M Filbey; Christopher Jepson; Caryn Lerman; Neal L Benowitz; Jerry Stitzel; Angela Bryan; John McGeary; Heather M Haughey
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2007-09

5.  Difficulty in losing weight by behavioral intervention for women with Trp64Arg polymorphism of the beta3-adrenergic receptor gene.

Authors:  K Shiwaku; A Nogi; E Anuurad; K Kitajima; B Enkhmaa; K Shimono; Y Yamane
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2003-09

6.  Adherence to healthy lifestyle habits in US adults, 1988-2006.

Authors:  Dana E King; Arch G Mainous; Mark Carnemolla; Charles J Everett
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 7.  Interdisciplinary, translational, and community-based participatory research: finding a common language to improve cancer research.

Authors:  James R Hebert; Heather M Brandt; Cheryl A Armstead; Swann A Adams; Susan E Steck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Exploring the ELSI universe: critical issues in the evolution of human genomic research.

Authors:  Jill M Oliver; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Improved weight management using genetic information to personalize a calorie controlled diet.

Authors:  Ioannis Arkadianos; Ana M Valdes; Efstathios Marinos; Anna Florou; Rosalynn D Gill; Keith A Grimaldi
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  25 in total

1.  Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Christine W Duarte; Susannah Daggett; Andrea Siewers; Bill Killam; Kahsi A Smith; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-19

2.  Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.

Authors:  T Hurlimann; V Menuz; J Graham; J Robitaille; M-C Vohl; B Godard
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.523

3.  Beliefs about genetic influences on eating behaviors: Characteristics and associations with weight management confidence.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Sofia Bouhlal; Megan R Goldring; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2017-02-09

4.  Identifying eating behavior phenotypes and their correlates: A novel direction toward improving weight management interventions.

Authors:  Sofia Bouhlal; Colleen M McBride; Niraj S Trivedi; Tanya Agurs-Collins; Susan Persky
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 5.  Identifying and Addressing Individuals Resistant to Behavioral Lifestyle Treatment.

Authors:  Katherine R Arlinghaus; Craig A Johnston
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2019-04-21

6.  Implications of Personal Genomic Testing for Health Behaviors: The Case of Smoking.

Authors:  Emily Olfson; Sarah Hartz; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Karen Ruth; Sharon L Manne; James Cocroft; Randa Sifri; Barry Ziring; Desiree Burgh; Eric Ross; David S Weinberg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-18

8.  Baseline motives for eating palatable food: racial differences and preliminary utility in predicting weight loss.

Authors:  Maria D Sylvester; Emilee E Burgess; Taraneh Soleymani; Sunil Daniel; Bulent Turan; Mary Katherine Ray; Courtney T Howard; Mary M Boggiano
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  What keeps a body moving? The brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism and intrinsic motivation to exercise in humans.

Authors:  Ann E Caldwell Hooper; Angela D Bryan; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-05-08

10.  Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.