Literature DB >> 22389369

Functional analysis of the degradation of cellulosic substrates by a Chaetomium globosum endophytic isolate.

Paolo Longoni1, Marinella Rodolfi, Laura Pantaleoni, Enrico Doria, Lorenzo Concia, Anna Maria Picco, Rino Cella.   

Abstract

Most photosynthetically fixed carbon is contained in cell wall polymers present in plant biomasses, the largest organic carbon source in the biosphere. The degradation of these polymers for biotechnological purposes requires the combined action of several enzymes. To identify new activities, we examined which enzymes are activated by an endophytic strain of Chaetomium globosum to degrade cellulose-containing substrates. After biochemical analyses of the secretome of the fungus grown on cellulose or woody substrates, we took advantage of the available genomic data to identify potentially involved genes. After in silico identification of putative genes encoding either proteins able to bind to cellulose or glycohydrolases (GHs) of family 7, we investigated their transcript levels by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Our data suggest that eight genes compose the core of the cellulose-degrading system of C. globosum. Notably, the related enzymes belong structurally to the well-described GH families 5, 6, 7, 16, and 45, which are known to be the core of the cellulose degradation systems of several ascomycetes. The high expression levels of cellobiose dehydrogenase and two GH 61 enzymes suggest the involvement of this oxidoreductive synergic system in C. globosum. Transcript analysis along with relevant coding sequence (CDS) isolation and expression of recombinant proteins proved to be a key strategy for the determination of the features of two endoglucanases used by C. globosum for the first attack of crystalline cellulose. Finally, the possible involvement of transcriptional regulators described for other ascomycetes is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22389369      PMCID: PMC3346360          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00124-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  52 in total

1.  Cellulase complex from Chaetomium cellulolyticum: isolation and properties of major components.

Authors:  N V Ankudimova; V A Baraznenok; E G Becker; O N Okunev
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Two cellobiohydrolase-encoding genes from Aspergillus niger require D-xylose and the xylanolytic transcriptional activator XlnR for their expression.

Authors:  M M Gielkens; E Dekkers; J Visser; L H de Graaff
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The three-dimensional structure of a Trichoderma reesei beta-mannanase from glycoside hydrolase family 5.

Authors:  E Sabini; H Schubert; G Murshudov; K S Wilson; M Siika-Aho; M Penttilä
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-01

4.  Properties of neutral cellobiose dehydrogenase from the ascomycete Chaetomium sp. INBI 2-26(-) and comparison with basidiomycetous cellobiose dehydrogenases.

Authors:  K N Karapetyan; T V Fedorova; L G Vasil'chenko; R Ludwig; D Haltrich; M L Rabinovich
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  A transition from cellulose swelling to cellulose dissolution by o-phosphoric acid: evidence from enzymatic hydrolysis and supramolecular structure.

Authors:  Y-H Percival Zhang; Jingbiao Cui; Lee R Lynd; Lana R Kuang
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Role of Ace2 (Activator of Cellulases 2) within the xyn2 transcriptosome of Hypocrea jecorina.

Authors:  Astrid R Stricker; Peter Trefflinger; Nina Aro; Merja Penttilä; Robert L Mach
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Cellulolytic activities ofChaetomium globosum on different cellulosic substrates.

Authors:  S N Mathur
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  New families in the classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities.

Authors:  B Henrissat; A Bairoch
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database.

Authors:  Aron Marchler-Bauer; John B Anderson; Farideh Chitsaz; Myra K Derbyshire; Carol DeWeese-Scott; Jessica H Fong; Lewis Y Geer; Renata C Geer; Noreen R Gonzales; Marc Gwadz; Siqian He; David I Hurwitz; John D Jackson; Zhaoxi Ke; Christopher J Lanczycki; Cynthia A Liebert; Chunlei Liu; Fu Lu; Shennan Lu; Gabriele H Marchler; Mikhail Mullokandov; James S Song; Asba Tasneem; Narmada Thanki; Roxanne A Yamashita; Dachuan Zhang; Naigong Zhang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  15 in total

1.  Emergence shapes the structure of the seed microbiota.

Authors:  Matthieu Barret; Martial Briand; Sophie Bonneau; Anne Préveaux; Sophie Valière; Olivier Bouchez; Gilles Hunault; Philippe Simoneau; Marie-Agnès Jacquesa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Phylogenetic reassessment of the Chaetomium globosum species complex.

Authors:  X W Wang; L Lombard; J Z Groenewald; J Li; S I R Videira; R A Samson; X Z Liu; P W Crous
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 11.051

3.  Substrate-specific transcription of the enigmatic GH61 family of the pathogenic white-rot fungus Heterobasidion irregulare during growth on lignocellulose.

Authors:  Igor Yakovlev; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Ari M Hietala; Emil Stefańczyk; Halvor Solheim; Carl Gunnar Fossdal
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Production by Tobacco Transplastomic Plants of Recombinant Fungal and Bacterial Cell-Wall Degrading Enzymes to Be Used for Cellulosic Biomass Saccharification.

Authors:  Paolo Longoni; Sadhu Leelavathi; Enrico Doria; Vanga Siva Reddy; Rino Cella
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Biological Control of Phytophthora palmivora Causing Root Rot of Pomelo Using Chaetomium spp.

Authors:  Phung Manh Hung; Pongnak Wattanachai; Soytong Kasem; Supatta Poaim
Journal:  Mycobiology       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Optimization of synergism of a recombinant auxiliary activity 9 from Chaetomium globosum with cellulase in cellulose hydrolysis.

Authors:  In Jung Kim; Ki Hyun Nam; Eun Ju Yun; Sooah Kim; Hak Jin Youn; Hee Jin Lee; In-Geol Choi; Kyoung Heon Kim
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Trichoderma-Inoculated Miscanthus Straw Can Replace Peat in Strawberry Cultivation, with Beneficial Effects on Disease Control.

Authors:  Jane Debode; Caroline De Tender; Pieter Cremelie; Ana S Lee; Tina Kyndt; Hilde Muylle; Tom De Swaef; Bart Vandecasteele
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Conversion from long-term cultivated wheat field to Jerusalem artichoke plantation changed soil fungal communities.

Authors:  Xingang Zhou; Jianhui Zhang; Danmei Gao; Huan Gao; Meiyu Guo; Li Li; Mengliang Zhao; Fengzhi Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Whole-Genome Sequence Data Analysis of Anoxybacillus kamchatkensis NASTPD13 Isolated from Hot Spring of Myagdi, Nepal.

Authors:  Punam Yadav; Shikha Sharma; Tribikram Bhattarai; Lakshmaiah Sreerama; Gandham S Prasad; Girish Sahni; Jyoti Maharjan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Fungal cellulose degradation by oxidative enzymes: from dysfunctional GH61 family to powerful lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase family.

Authors:  Ingo Morgenstern; Justin Powlowski; Adrian Tsang
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.