| Literature DB >> 29515613 |
Jane Debode1, Caroline De Tender1,2, Pieter Cremelie1, Ana S Lee1,3, Tina Kyndt3, Hilde Muylle1, Tom De Swaef1, Bart Vandecasteele1.
Abstract
Peat based growing media are not ecologically sustainable and often fail to support biological control. MiscanthusEntities:
Keywords: disease; nutrients; peat replacement; plant-microbe interactions; strawberry
Year: 2018 PMID: 29515613 PMCID: PMC5826379 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Physical appearance of the different substrate mixtures and their efficiency for Trichoderma colonization of the roots. From left to right: peat, control treatment; MS, miscanthus straw; MSEX, miscanthus with extrusion; MSEXTRI, miscanthus straw with extrusion and pre-colonized with Trichoderma harzianum T22. (A) Peat, amended and not amended with miscanthus treatments (before strawberry planting). (B) Strawberry roots of experiment I plated on a semi-selective medium for Trichoderma and incubated for 4 days (top) and 7 days (bottom). There were five replicates per treatment.
Experimental design.
| Peat | 100 | I & II | ||||
| MS | 80 | 20 | I & II | |||
| MSEX | 80 | 20 | I & II | |||
| MSEXTRI | 80 | 20 | ✓ | I & II | ||
| Peat + TRIspores | 100 | ✓ | II | |||
| MS + TRIspores | 80 | 20 | ✓ | II | ||
| MSEX + TRIspores | 80 | 20 | ✓ | II | ||
| MSEXTRI + TRIspores | 80 | 20 | ✓ | ✓ | II |
Peat replacement is expressed as % (v/v).
Nutrient concentrations in the strawberry leaves (dry matter (DM) basis) for several substrates at the end of experiment I and II.
| Peat | 1.9 a | 1.9 a | 7.4 a | 10.6 a | 5.6 b |
| MS | 1.8 a | 2.1 a | 13.2 b | 9.9 a | 4.6 a |
| MSEX | 1.9 a | 2.1 a | 11.3 ab | 10.4 a | 4.7 a |
| MSEXTRI | 1.9 a | 2.3 a | 11.8 ab | 10.3 a | 5.0 ab |
| Deficiency | <1.9 | <2 | <13 | <5 | <3 |
| Optimal range | 2.0-2.8 | 2.5-4.0 | 15-25 | 7.0-17 | 3.0-5.0 |
| Mixture | ns | ns | * | ns | * |
| Without | 1.7 a | 2.2 a | 10.0 a | 11.7 a | 4.8 a |
| With | 1.7 a | 2.3 a | 10.2 a | 11.8 a | 4.9 a |
| Peat | 1.8 a | 2.0 a | 6.9 a | 13.0 b | 5.9 b |
| MS | 1.7 a | 2.2 a | 12.4 c | 11.1 a | 4.3 a |
| MSEX | 1.7 a | 2.3 a | 10.7 b | 11.2 a | 4.5 a |
| MSEXTRI | 1.7 a | 2.4 a | 10.5 b | 11.7 a | 4.7 a |
| Deficiency | <1.9 | <2 | <13 | <5 | <3 |
| Optimal range | 2.0-2.8 | 2.5-4.0 | 15-25 | 7.0-17 | 3.0-5.0 |
| TRIspores | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Mixture | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** |
| TRIspores x Mixture | * | * | ns | ns | ns |
Different letters in each column indicate significant differences between treatments based on Tukey HSD post-hoc multiple comparison. ns, .
Experiment I. Effect of adding Miscanthus straw (MS) with or without extrusion (EX) and with or without Trichoderma pre-inoculation (TRI) on strawberry fruit yield, green biomass yield (DW: dry weight, FW: fresh weight), Total Leaf Area (TLA), Specific Leaf Area (SLA), Chlorophyll Concentration Index (CCI), post harvest Botrytis cinerea disease incidence ± standard error (SE) and Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC).
| n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 45 | |||
| Peat | 2216 ± 309a | 140.4 ± 5.4 | 26.90 ± 0.55 | 5.20 ± 1.57 | 86.99 ± 4.54 | 29.32 ± 1.73 | 29.37 ± 6.20 | 49.86 ± 13.16 | 91.57 ± 6.11 | 110.33a |
| MS | 1356 ± 581b | 138.5 ± 7.5 | 24.93 ± 6.75 | 4.00 ± 1.09 | 72.17 ± 5.71 | 25.62 ± 1.61 | 27.65 ± 5.63 | 47.64 ± 5.63 | 90.38 ± 4.29 | 106.66a |
| MSEX | 1389 ± 460ab | 145.9 ± 10.5 | 25.17 ± 5.94 | 5.39 ± 1.85 | 75.60 ± 5.40 | 27.52 ± 1.66 | 24.75 ± 4.18 | 50.79 ± 10.97 | 82.56 ± 4.87 | 104.45a |
| MSEXTRI | 1362 ± 246b | 145.2 ± 8.4 | 24.39 ± 4.30 | 5.52 ± 1.12 | 72.09 ± 4.80 | 26.70 ± 1.60 | 11.9 ± 4.53 | 34.32 ± 11.32 | 76.35 ± 10.68 | 78.45b |
| ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | − | − | − | * | |
Only when significant differences between treatments: indicated with different letters (tested with post-hoc Tukey HSD test). ns, .
Experiment II. Effect of adding Miscanthus straw (MS) with or without extrusion (EX), with or without Trichoderma pre-inoculation (TRI), and with or without Trianum® spores (TRIspores) on strawberry fruit yield, aboveground vegetative biomass yield (DW: dry weight, FW: fresh weight), Total Leaf Area (TLA), Specific Leaf Area (SLA), total CCI, stolon and root development, post-harvest Botrytis cinerea disease incidence ± standard error (SE) and Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC).
| n | 20 | 20 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 224 | ||||
| Without | 2012.60 ± 88.28 | 140.68 ± 2.24 | 26.74 ± 4.22 | 12.40 ± 0.60 | 68.08 ± 3.56 | 82.14 ± 3.00 | 25.06 ± 1.01 | 4.10 ± 0.23 | 4.10 ± 0.23 | 5.36 ± 6.19 | 20.24 ± 14.25 | 37.50 ± 19.48 | 59.52 ± 31.41 | 90.17 |
| With | 2107.86 ± 99.90 | 139.16 ± 1.96 | 26.89 ± 4.05 | 13.16 ± 0.64 | 68.52 ± 3.64 | 82.57 ± 3.55 | 24.63 ± 0.44 | 4.35 ± 0.25 | 4.35 ± 0.25 | 5.36 ± 7.88 | 19.18 ± 19.45 | 39.11 ± 21.99 | 58.29 ± 24.32 | 90.12 |
| n | 10 | 10 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 112 | ||||
| Peat | 2680.76 ± 61.72a | 138.69 ± 1.91 | 29.52 ± 3.12a | 13.72 ± 0.88 | 91.52 ± 6.28 | 105.64 ± 3.71a | 32.88 ± 1.23a | 5.00 ± 0.30a | 2.57 ± 0.14 | 3.57 ± 6.19 | 19.05 ± 15.17 | 36.90 ± 20.96 | 58.33 ± 26.96 | 86.90ab |
| MS | 1870.42 ± 75.60b | 143.21 ± 1.91 | 25.96 ± 3.24b | 12.32 ± 0.84 | 59.24 ± 4.16b | 72.36 ± 2.62b | 21.61 ± 0.91b | 3.64 ± 0.27b | 2.61 ± 0.11 | 5.95 ± 7.52 | 14.29 ± 13.33 | 33.81 ± 24.58 | 57.42 ± 22.33 | 79.78ab |
| MSEX | 1872.72 ± 62.98b | 135.43 ± 3.11 | 25.51 ± 2.68b | 12.68 ± 0.88 | 59.52 ± 4.44b | 75.50 ± 2.90b | 22.50 ± 0.91b | 4.11 ± 0.39b | 2.85 ± 0.07 | 9.52 ± 10.31 | 33.33 ± 26.81 | 55.95 ± 18.33 | 69.05 ± 26.81 | 128.57a |
| MSEXTRI | 1802.82 ± 52.23b | 142.59 ± 3.88 | 26.20 ± 3.68b | 12.44 ± 0.92 | 63.20 ± 4.88b | 76.03 ± 4.30b | 22.51 ± 1.18b | 4.20 ± 0.35b | 2.60 ± 0.12 | 2.38 ± 4.12 | 12.18 ± 12.09 | 26.56 ± 19.07 | 50.82 ± 35.37 | 65.34b |
| TRIspores | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||
| Mixture | ** | ns | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | * | ns | * | ||||
| TRIspores x Mixture | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||
Only when significant differences between treatments: indicated with different letters (tested with post-hoc Tukey HSD test). ns, .
Richness measurement (observed OTUs) and richness and diversity estimates (Chao1 and Shannon-Wiener diversity index) of the bacterial and fungal community of the strawberry rhizosphere, grown in different substrate mixtures.
| Peat | 2106 ± 253(a) | 2979 ± 385(a) | 8.83 ± 0.37(a) | 686 ± 52(a) | 813 ± 76(a) | 6.54 ± 0.33(a) |
| MS | 2206 ± 174(a) | 3096 ± 173(a) | 9.16 ± 0.40(a) | 587 ± 80(ab) | 783 ± 112(ab) | 4.79 ± 0.58(b) |
| MSEX | 2083 ± 182(a) | 2890 ± 189(a) | 8.90 ± 0.38(a) | 642 ± 84(a) | 812 ± 116(a) | 5.41 ± 0.25(b) |
| MSEXTRI | 2194 ± 115(a) | 3012 ± 179(a) | 9.19 ± 0.14(a) | 529 ± 33(b) | 684 ± 52(b) | 3.72 ± 0.22( |
| Peat | 1451 ± 697(a) | 2122 ± 965(a) | 7.39 ± 1.36(a) | 662 ± 85(a) | 866 ± 106(a) | 5.86 ± 0.77(a) |
| MS | 1292 ± 534(a) | 1982 ± 724(a) | 6.84 ± 1.24(a) | 658 ± 14(a) | 864 ± 36(a) | 5.53 ± 0.15(a) |
| MSEX | 1770 ± 444(a) | 2584 ± 545(a) | 8.07 ± 1.16(a) | 731 ± 52(a) | 1001 ± 73(a) | 5.53 ± 0.28(a) |
| MSEXTRI | 1115 ± 141(a) | 1743 ± 210(a) | 6.59 ± 0.53(a) | 637 ± 65(a) | 862 ± 117(a) | 5.16 ± 0.29(a) |
| Peat + TRIspores | 1618 ± 447(a) | 2413 ± 582(a) | 7.68 ± 1.11(a) | 660 ± 91(a) | 888 ± 118(a) | 5.48 ± 0.40(a) |
| MSEX + TRIspores | 1305 ± 396(a) | 2004 ± 521(a) | 7.00 ± 0.84(a) | 733 ± 57(a) | 1018 ± 88(a) | 5.55 ± 0.32(a) |
Values represent means ± standard deviation, based on 5 replicates per mixture (Miscanthus straw without (MS) or with extrusion (MSEX), and with Trichoderma pre-colonization (TRI), TRIspores: with Trianum® spores). Different letters in each column indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 2Community composition of the strawberry rhizosphere microbiome for the different mixtures. Peat, control treatment; MS, miscanthus straw; MSEX, miscanthus with extrusion; MSEXTRI, miscanthus straw with extrusion and pre-colonized with Trichoderma harzianum T22, and TRIspores: Trianum® spores added directly to the growing medium. (A) Principal Coordinate analysis (PCoA) profiles of pairwise community dissimilarity (Bray-Curtis) indices of the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA genes (bacteria, top figure) and ITS2 sequencing data (fungi, bottom). Ellipses represent the 95% confidence intervals. PCoA plots are given for both Experiment I (left) and Experiment II (right) separately; (B) Representation of the fungal phyla in mean relative abundance (%) (n = 5), both for Experiment I (left) and Experiment II (right). Sequences which could not be classified on phyla level or to the kingdom fungi are represented in the group Other.
Description of possible plant- and/or soil-linked functions of statistical significant fungal genera in mixtures compared to peat whose mean relative abundance is at least 1% in at least one mixture type.
| Ascomycota | 0.22 ± 0.12 | 0.3x | 1.6x | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.7x | 0.8x | 0.8x | 1.0x | Cellulosic substrate degradation (Longoni et al., | |||
| 5.23 ± 1.21 | 1.55 ± 0.79 | 0.5x | Some plant pathogens, endophytic organisms (Bensch et al., | |||||||||
| 0.03 ± 0.01 | <0.1x | 1.04 ± 0.56 | 0.5x | 0.9x | / | |||||||
| 4.07 ± 1.17 | 0.3x | 2.53 ± 0.89 | 2.8x | Lignocellulose degradation, induced resistance (Ko et al., | ||||||||
| 1.15 ± 0.64 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.4x | 0.4x | Root rot pathogens of herbaceous plants (Cabral et al., | ||||||||
| 1.12 ± 0.23 | 0.2x | 0.53 ± 0.24 | 1.5x | PGP, chitin degradation, biocontrol and induced resistance (Goettel et al., | ||||||||
| 0.11 ± 0.08 | 0.2x | 1.02 ± 0.29 | Root-associated fungi (Hambleton and Sigler, | |||||||||
| 0.13 ± 0.08 | 0.2x | 0.6x | 2.57 ± 0.67 | 0.9x | 0.5x | 1.3x | 1.1x | 1.0x | Wood fungi (Linnakoski et al., | |||
| 0.02 ± 0.02 | 8.5x | 2.0x | 1.0x | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 3.2x | Plant-associated fungi producing metabolites (Paranagama et al., | ||||||
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | 3.00 ± 1.08 | 0.6x | 0.8x | Strawberry pathogen (Debode et al., | |||||
| 0.02 ± 0.01 | 3.0x | 14.5x | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.1x | / | |||||||
| 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.8x | 0.59 ± 0.16 | 1.8x | 1.3x | 1.2x | 1.3x | Biocontrol (Tagawa et al., | |||||
| 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 3.8x | Saprophytic species in soil (Rodrigues et al., | |||||||||
| 1.38 ± 0.90 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.6x | 0.8x | 1.3x | 3.7x | 0.5x | / | |||||
| 0.52 ± 0.18 | 3.1x | 3.3x | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.6x | 2.1x | 1.1x | 0.4x | 0.4x | / | |||
| Basidio-mycota | 1.69 ± 0.24 | 0.3x | 5.88 ± 1.61 | 0.4x | 0.5x | Biocontrol & epiphytic fungi (Sharma et al., | ||||||
| 3.63 ± 1.85 | 9.63 ± 2.20 | 1.2x | 0.6x | 1.1x | / | |||||||
| Zygomycota | 14.61 ± 3.65 | 0.3x | 0.1x | <0.1x | 2.90 ± 0.77 | 0.5x | 0.8x | Chitin degradation, biocontrol (Tagawa et al., | ||||
| 0.96 ± 0.28 | 0.2x | 0.42 ± 0.09 | 0.5x | 0.6x | / | |||||||
The peat column indicates the mean relative abundance (%) ± standard error of the strawberry rhizosphere genera grown in peat. The other mixtures indicate the increase or decrease in mean relative abundance as compared to the peat mixture. Statistical significant increases compared with the peat substrate are indicated in .
Genus showed no significant differences between mixtures in Experiment I
Genus showed no significant differences between mixtures in Experiment II
Figure 3Relative gene expression of seven defense genes in strawberry based on Experiment II. Expression levels are expressed in fold changes, by which the peat treatment is used as control treatment (gene expression is set at 1). Statistical significant differences compared to the control treatment are indicated with an asterisk.