Catherine R Messina1, Dorothy S Lane, Joseph C Anderson. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, HSC L3, Rm 086, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036, USA. Catherine.Messina@stonybrook.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overweight/obese women and men are at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Research examining body mass index (BMI) and CRC screening has had mixed results. A clearer understanding of the extent to which high-BMI subgroups are screened for CRC is needed to inform planning for CRC screening promotions targeting BMI. METHODS: Data were obtained from a random, population-based sample of women and men at average-risk for CRC (aged 50-75 years) during 2004 (n = 1098). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate whether BMI category was significantly associated with the probability of reporting recent CRC screening and with the probability of agreeing with statements denoting attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening. Attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening were evaluated as potential mediators and moderators of the association between BMI category and CRC screening. RESULTS: After controlling for characteristics associated with CRC screening, overweight and obese women were each 40% less likely to have CRC screening than women with normal-BMI (OR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.4-0.9 and OR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.3-0.9). BMI category was unrelated to screening among men. Obese women (but not men) were less aware than normal-BMI women that obesity increased risk for CRC (OR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.9) and less worried about CRC (OR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.8). However, findings suggest that attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening did not mediate or moderate the association between BMI category and CRC screening. CONCLUSION: Overweight/obese women are at increased risk for CRC because of their greater BMI and their propensity not to screen for CRC. Study findings suggest that potentially modifiable perceptions, e.g., lack of awareness of risk for CRC and less worry about CRC, in this subgroup may not explain the relationship between BMI category and reduced screening.
BACKGROUND: Overweight/obesewomen and men are at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Research examining body mass index (BMI) and CRC screening has had mixed results. A clearer understanding of the extent to which high-BMI subgroups are screened for CRC is needed to inform planning for CRC screening promotions targeting BMI. METHODS: Data were obtained from a random, population-based sample of women and men at average-risk for CRC (aged 50-75 years) during 2004 (n = 1098). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate whether BMI category was significantly associated with the probability of reporting recent CRC screening and with the probability of agreeing with statements denoting attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening. Attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening were evaluated as potential mediators and moderators of the association between BMI category and CRC screening. RESULTS: After controlling for characteristics associated with CRC screening, overweight and obesewomen were each 40% less likely to have CRC screening than women with normal-BMI (OR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.4-0.9 and OR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.3-0.9). BMI category was unrelated to screening among men. Obesewomen (but not men) were less aware than normal-BMI women that obesity increased risk for CRC (OR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.9) and less worried about CRC (OR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.8). However, findings suggest that attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening did not mediate or moderate the association between BMI category and CRC screening. CONCLUSION: Overweight/obesewomen are at increased risk for CRC because of their greater BMI and their propensity not to screen for CRC. Study findings suggest that potentially modifiable perceptions, e.g., lack of awareness of risk for CRC and less worry about CRC, in this subgroup may not explain the relationship between BMI category and reduced screening.
Authors: Jennifer Lin; Shumin M Zhang; Nancy R Cook; Kathryn M Rexrode; I-Min Lee; Julie E Buring Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Tobias Pischon; Petra H Lahmann; Heiner Boeing; Christine Friedenreich; Teresa Norat; Anne Tjønneland; Jytte Halkjaer; Kim Overvad; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Gregory Guernec; Manuela M Bergmann; Jakob Linseisen; Nikolaus Becker; Antonia Trichopoulou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Sabina Sieri; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Paolo Vineis; Salvatore Panico; Petra H M Peeters; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Bethany Van Guelpen; Richard Palmqvist; Göran Berglund; Carlos Alberto Gonzalez; Miren Dorronsoro; Aurelio Barricarte; Carmen Navarro; Carmen Martinez; J Ramón Quirós; Andrew Roddam; Naomi Allen; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Pietro Ferrari; Rudolf Kaaks; Nadia Slimani; Elio Riboli Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Shannon M Christy; Alyssa Schmidt; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Steven K Sutton; Stacy N Davis; Enmanuel Chavarria; Rania Abdulla; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Ida Schultz; Richard Roetzheim; David Shibata; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Piotr Spychalski; Jarek Kobiela; Paulina Wieszczy; Michał F Kamiński; Jarosław Reguła Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 4.623