Literature DB >> 22386859

Body mass index and screening for colorectal cancer: gender and attitudinal factors.

Catherine R Messina1, Dorothy S Lane, Joseph C Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overweight/obese women and men are at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Research examining body mass index (BMI) and CRC screening has had mixed results. A clearer understanding of the extent to which high-BMI subgroups are screened for CRC is needed to inform planning for CRC screening promotions targeting BMI.
METHODS: Data were obtained from a random, population-based sample of women and men at average-risk for CRC (aged 50-75 years) during 2004 (n = 1098). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate whether BMI category was significantly associated with the probability of reporting recent CRC screening and with the probability of agreeing with statements denoting attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening. Attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening were evaluated as potential mediators and moderators of the association between BMI category and CRC screening.
RESULTS: After controlling for characteristics associated with CRC screening, overweight and obese women were each 40% less likely to have CRC screening than women with normal-BMI (OR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.4-0.9 and OR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.3-0.9). BMI category was unrelated to screening among men. Obese women (but not men) were less aware than normal-BMI women that obesity increased risk for CRC (OR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.9) and less worried about CRC (OR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.8). However, findings suggest that attitudes/perceptions about CRC and screening did not mediate or moderate the association between BMI category and CRC screening.
CONCLUSION: Overweight/obese women are at increased risk for CRC because of their greater BMI and their propensity not to screen for CRC. Study findings suggest that potentially modifiable perceptions, e.g., lack of awareness of risk for CRC and less worry about CRC, in this subgroup may not explain the relationship between BMI category and reduced screening.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386859      PMCID: PMC4230010          DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  56 in total

1.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

2.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

3.  American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  T Byers; B Levin; D Rothenberger; G D Dodd; R A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices preferences for decision making.

Authors:  Catherine R Messina; Dorothy S Lane; Roger Grimson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Body size and the risk of colon cancer in a large case-control study.

Authors:  B J Caan; A O Coates; M L Slattery; J D Potter; C P Quesenberry; S M Edwards
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1998-02

6.  Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Ellen P McCarthy; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Body mass index and risk of colorectal cancer in women (United States).

Authors:  Jennifer Lin; Shumin M Zhang; Nancy R Cook; Kathryn M Rexrode; I-Min Lee; Julie E Buring
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Authors:  Tobias Pischon; Petra H Lahmann; Heiner Boeing; Christine Friedenreich; Teresa Norat; Anne Tjønneland; Jytte Halkjaer; Kim Overvad; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Gregory Guernec; Manuela M Bergmann; Jakob Linseisen; Nikolaus Becker; Antonia Trichopoulou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Sabina Sieri; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Paolo Vineis; Salvatore Panico; Petra H M Peeters; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Bethany Van Guelpen; Richard Palmqvist; Göran Berglund; Carlos Alberto Gonzalez; Miren Dorronsoro; Aurelio Barricarte; Carmen Navarro; Carmen Martinez; J Ramón Quirós; Andrew Roddam; Naomi Allen; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Pietro Ferrari; Rudolf Kaaks; Nadia Slimani; Elio Riboli
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Body mass index and up-to-date colorectal cancer screening among Marylanders aged 50 years and older.

Authors:  Mikhail Menis; Bernard Kozlovsky; Pat Langenberg; Min Zhan; Diane M Dwyer; Ebenezer Israel; Carmela Groves; Annette Hopkins; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Overweight, obesity, and colorectal cancer screening: disparity between men and women.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; David B Allison; Kevin R Fontaine
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Do recent epidemiologic observations impact who and how we should screen for CRC?

Authors:  Ethan Bortniker; Joseph C Anderson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Rebecca A Hubbard; Eric Johnson; Jessica Chubak; Aruna Kamineni; Beverly B Green; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Understanding Cancer Worry Among Patients in a Community Clinic-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Study.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Alyssa Schmidt; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Steven K Sutton; Stacy N Davis; Enmanuel Chavarria; Rania Abdulla; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Ida Schultz; Richard Roetzheim; David Shibata; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Exploring opportunities for colorectal cancer screening and prevention in the context of diabetes self-management: an analysis of the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Kafui Adjaye-Gbewonyo; Susan A Sabatino; Mary C White
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A Comparative Study Evaluating the Incidence of Colorectal Neoplasia(s) in Candidates for Bariatric Surgery by Screening Colonoscopy, 40-49 Versus 50-65 Years Old: a Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Toygar Toydemir; Görkem Özgen; İsmail Çalıkoğlu; Özdal Ersoy; Mehmet Ali Yerdel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Clinical stages of colorectal cancer diagnosed in obese and overweight individuals in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program.

Authors:  Piotr Spychalski; Jarek Kobiela; Paulina Wieszczy; Michał F Kamiński; Jarosław Reguła
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Public Awareness of Bowel Cancer Risk Factors, Symptoms and Screening in Tasmania, Australia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Simone M Lee; Vincent L Versace; Kehinde Obamiro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.