Literature DB >> 9152173

American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer.

T Byers1, B Levin, D Rothenberger, G D Dodd, R A Smith.   

Abstract

In the past, differences in opinion among professional groups about colorectal cancer screening have been a barrier to colorectal cancer prevention. It is clear that screening for colorectal cancer is currently practiced by fewer than 20% of American adults. However, a growing consensus now exists that even though we do not yet have trial data to compare precisely the various methods for screening, there is now both a compelling case for screening and a reasonable set of methods that clinicians and patients can consider. By applying the knowledge we already have, it is likely that most of the deaths from colorectal cancer in the United States could be prevented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152173     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.47.3.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  79 in total

1.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.

Authors:  C D Johnson; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Screening colonoscopy: is it time?

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Protective effect of faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer: worse prognosis for screening refusers.

Authors:  Y Niv; M Lev-El; G Fraser; G Abuksis; A Tamir
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Colorectal cancer screening: now is the time.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-02

6.  Psychological factors related to delay in consultation for cancer symptoms.

Authors:  Stephen L Ristvedt; Kathryn M Trinkaus
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Experience of a public health colorectal cancer testing program in Maryland.

Authors:  Diane M Dwyer; Carmela Groves; Annette Hopkins; Eithne Keelaghan; Fatma M Shebl; Barbara Andrews; Marsha Bienia; Eileen Steinberger
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Mathematical models and cost-effective screening strategies for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Smith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

Review 10.  New York Citywide Colon Cancer Control Coalition: A public health effort to increase colon cancer screening and address health disparities.

Authors:  Steven H Itzkowitz; Sidney J Winawer; Marian Krauskopf; Mari Carlesimo; Felice H Schnoll-Sussman; Katy Huang; Thomas K Weber; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.