Literature DB >> 29870517

Understanding Cancer Worry Among Patients in a Community Clinic-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Study.

Shannon M Christy1, Alyssa Schmidt, Hsiao-Lan Wang, Steven K Sutton, Stacy N Davis, Enmanuel Chavarria, Rania Abdulla, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Susan T Vadaparampil, Ida Schultz, Richard Roetzheim, David Shibata, Cathy D Meade, Clement K Gwede.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) screening disparities, it is important to understand correlates of different types of cancer worry among ethnically diverse individuals.
OBJECTIVES: The current study examined the prevalence of three types of cancer worry (i.e., general cancer worry, CRC-specific worry, and worry about CRC test results) as well as sociodemographic and health-related predictors for each type of cancer worry.
METHODS: Participants were aged 50-75, at average CRC risk, nonadherent to CRC screening guidelines, and enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to increase CRC screening. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire assessing sociodemographics, health beliefs, healthcare experiences, and three cancer worry measures. Associations between study variables were examined with separate univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Responses from a total of 416 participants were used. Of these, 47% reported experiencing moderate-to-high levels of general cancer worry. Predictors of general cancer worry were salience and coherence (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.0, 1.3]), perceived susceptibility (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI [1.1, 1.3), and social influence (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.0, 0.1]). Fewer (23%) reported moderate-to-high levels of CRC-specific worry or CRC test worry (35%). Predictors of CRC worry were perceived susceptibility (aOR = 1.4, 95% CI [1.3, 1.6]) and social influence (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.0, 1.2]); predictors of CRC test result worry were perceived susceptibility (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI [1.1, 1.3) and marital status (aOR = 2.0, 95% CI [1.1, 3.7] for married/partnered vs. single and aOR = 2.3, 95% CI [1.3, 4.1] for divorced/widowed vs. single). DISCUSSION: Perceived susceptibility consistently predicted the three types of cancer worry, whereas other predictors varied between cancer worry types and in magnitude of association. The three types of cancer worry were generally predicted by health beliefs, suggesting potential malleability. Future research should include multiple measures of cancer worry and clear definitions of how cancer worry is measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29870517      PMCID: PMC6023767          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  47 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Errol J Philip; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Racial Differences in Physical and Mental Health: Socio-economic Status, Stress and Discrimination.

Authors:  D R Williams; J S Jackson; N B Anderson
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  1997-07

3.  Associations of perceived risk and worry with cancer health-protective actions: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Richard P Moser; Kevin McCaul; Ellen Peters; Wendy Nelson; Stephen E Marcus
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2007-01

4.  Risk perception measures' associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Rebecca A Ferrer; Peter A Ubel; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Foreign-born South Asians in the Metropolitan New York/New Jersey Region.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Michael B Steinberg; Cristine Delnevo; Rajiv Ulpe; Kristen Sorice
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

6.  Unwillingness to participate in colorectal cancer screening: examining fears, attitudes, and medical mistrust in an ethnically diverse sample of adults 50 years and older.

Authors:  Shalanda A Bynum; Jenna L Davis; B Lee Green; Ralph V Katz
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2012 May-Jun

Review 7.  The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Tamara R Buckley; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Understanding the barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among low income immigrant hispanics.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Jennie Ellison; Cristina Villagra; Gary Winkel; Alejandro Varela; Zeida Quintero-Canetti; Anabella Castillo; Linda Thélémaque; Sheba King; Katherine Duhamel
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2010-08

9.  A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Randa Sifri; Terry Hyslop; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; James Cocroft; Thomas Wolf; Jocelyn Andrel; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; E Ross; C Jepson; T Wolf; A Balshem; L Millner; H Leventhal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.