Literature DB >> 16818856

Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Tobias Pischon1, Petra H Lahmann, Heiner Boeing, Christine Friedenreich, Teresa Norat, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjaer, Kim Overvad, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Gregory Guernec, Manuela M Bergmann, Jakob Linseisen, Nikolaus Becker, Antonia Trichopoulou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Sabina Sieri, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Salvatore Panico, Petra H M Peeters, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Hendriek C Boshuizen, Bethany Van Guelpen, Richard Palmqvist, Göran Berglund, Carlos Alberto Gonzalez, Miren Dorronsoro, Aurelio Barricarte, Carmen Navarro, Carmen Martinez, J Ramón Quirós, Andrew Roddam, Naomi Allen, Sheila Bingham, Kay-Tee Khaw, Pietro Ferrari, Rudolf Kaaks, Nadia Slimani, Elio Riboli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Body weight and body mass index (BMI) are positively related to risk of colon cancer in men, whereas weak or no associations exist in women. This discrepancy may be related to differences in fat distribution between sexes or to the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women.
METHODS: We used multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between anthropometric measures and risks of colon and rectal cancer among 368 277 men and women who were free of cancer at baseline from nine countries of the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: During 6.1 years of follow-up, we identified 984 and 586 patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. Body weight and BMI were statistically significantly associated with colon cancer risk in men (highest versus lowest quintile of BMI, relative risk [RR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 2.15; P(trend) = .006) but not in women. In contrast, comparisons of the highest to the lowest quintile showed that several anthropometric measures, including waist circumference (men, RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.93; P(trend) = .001; women, RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.03; P(trend) = .008), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR; men, RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.15; P(trend) = .006; women, RR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.12 to 2.05; P(trend) = .002), and height (men, RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.98; P(trend) = .04; women, RR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.30 to 2.46; P(trend)<.001) were related to colon cancer risk in both sexes. The estimated absolute risk of developing colon cancer within 5 years was 203 and 131 cases per 100,000 men and 129 and 86 cases per 100,000 women in the highest and lowest quintiles of WHR, respectively. Upon further stratification, no association of waist circumference and WHR with risk of colon cancer was observed among postmenopausal women who used HRT. None of the anthropometric measures was statistically significantly related to rectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Waist circumference and WHR, indicators of abdominal obesity, were strongly associated with colon cancer risk in men and women in this population. The association of abdominal obesity with colon cancer risk may vary depending on HRT use in postmenopausal women; however, these findings require confirmation in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16818856     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  182 in total

Review 1.  Obesity in cancer survival.

Authors:  Niyati Parekh; Urmila Chandran; Elisa V Bandera
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Colonic mucosal fatty acid synthase as an early biomarker for colorectal neoplasia: modulation by obesity and gender.

Authors:  Mart Dela Cruz; Ramesh K Wali; Laura K Bianchi; Andrew J Radosevich; Susan E Crawford; Lisa Jepeal; Michael J Goldberg; Jaclyn Weinstein; Navneet Momi; Priya Roy; Audrey H Calderwood; Vadim Backman; Hemant K Roy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Body mass index and risk of colorectal cancer according to fatty acid synthase expression in the nurses' health study.

Authors:  Aya Kuchiba; Teppei Morikawa; Mai Yamauchi; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Andrew T Chan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Obesity and cancer.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-06

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: cohort study.

Authors:  Gillian K Reeves; Kirstin Pirie; Valerie Beral; Jane Green; Elizabeth Spencer; Diana Bull
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-06

6.  Cardiorespiratory fitness and digestive cancer mortality: findings from the aerobics center longitudinal study.

Authors:  J Brent Peel; Xuemei Sui; Charles E Matthews; Swann A Adams; James R Hébert; James W Hardin; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Association between body mass index and colorectal neoplasia at follow-up colonoscopy: a pooling study.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Jacobs; Dennis J Ahnen; Erin L Ashbeck; John A Baron; E Robert Greenberg; Peter Lance; David A Lieberman; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Arthur Schatzkin; Patricia A Thompson; María Elena Martínez
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Obesity increases the risks of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.

Authors:  Lisa L Strate; Yan L Liu; Walid H Aldoori; Sapna Syngal; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Laboratory, epidemiological, and human intervention studies show that tea (Camellia sinensis) may be useful in the prevention of obesity.

Authors:  Kimberly A Grove; Joshua D Lambert
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  A simple algebraic cancer equation: calculating how cancers may arise with normal mutation rates.

Authors:  Peter Calabrese; Darryl Shibata
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.