Literature DB >> 22386277

Accuracy of corneal power measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido-disk corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes.

Giacomo Savini1, Piero Barboni, Michele Carbonelli, Kenneth J Hoffer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of the corneal power measurements with a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido-disk corneal topography (Sirius) (combined Scheimpflug camera-topographer) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in unoperated eyes and compare the results with those by a validated corneal topographer (Keratron) (validated topographer).
SETTING: Private practice.
DESIGN: Case series.
METHODS: Consecutive patients having phacoemulsification and in-the-bag IOL implantation were studied. Intraocular lens power was calculated using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas; the axial length, as measured by ultrasound immersion biometry; and 3 corneal power measurements: validated topographer simulated keratometry (K); combined Scheimpflug camera-topographer simulated K (derived from anterior corneal curvature only); combined Scheimpflug camera-topographer mean pupil power (derived from anterior and posterior corneal curvatures through ray tracing). The prediction error was calculated as the difference between the predicted refraction and the refraction measured 1 month postoperatively.
RESULTS: When the corneal power measurements from the combined Scheimpflug camera-topographer were used, the mean absolute error (MAE) ranged between 0.23 diopter (D) ± 0.24 (SD) (simulated K and Hoffer Q formula) and 0.33 ± 0.23 D (mean pupil power and SRK/T formula). There were no statistically significant differences between the MAE generated by the simulated Ks of the 2 devices with any of the 3 formulas.
CONCLUSION: Both corneal power measurements (simulated K and mean pupil power) provided by the new combined Scheimpflug camera-topographer were successfully entered into third-generation IOL power calculation formulas in unoperated eyes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Hoffer is the author of the Hoffer Q formula and owns the EyeLab, which sells Hoffer Programs. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386277     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  12 in total

1.  Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography and optical biometry for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Ahmet Kirgiz; Kurşat Atalay; Havva Kaldirim; Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk; Mehmet Orcun Akdemir; Muhittin Taskapili
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Optical coherence tomography-based corneal power measurement and intraocular lens power calculation following laser vision correction (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  David Huang; Maolong Tang; Li Wang; Xinbo Zhang; Rebecca L Armour; Devin M Gattey; Lorinna H Lombardi; Douglas D Koch
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2013-09

3.  Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Leonardo Taroni; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Kenneth J Hoffer
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.456

4.  Comparison of two different scheimpflug devices in the detection of keratoconus, regular astigmatism, and healthy corneas.

Authors:  David Finis; Bernhard Ralla; Maria Karbe; Maria Borrelli; Stefan Schrader; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.

Authors:  Yanjun Hua; Zequan Xu; Wei Qiu; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements Obtained by Aladdin Optical Biometer and Sirius Corneal Topography.

Authors:  Onur Polat; Zeki Baysal; Serkan Özcan; Sibel İnan; Ümit Übeyt İnan
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Accuracy of optical biometry combined with Placido disc corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Kenneth J Hoffer; Piero Barboni; Nicole Balducci; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of the anterior segment parameters after Nd: YAG laser Capsulotomy: Effect the design of intraocular lens Haptic.

Authors:  Berkay Akmaz; Fahrettin Akay
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 9.  Intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus; A review of literature.

Authors:  Leila Ghiasian; Navid Abolfathzadeh; Navid Manafi; Ali Hadavandkhani
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 10.  Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Kenneth J Hoffer
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.