PURPOSE: To use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to measure corneal power and improve the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power in cataract surgeries after laser vision correction. METHODS: Patients with previous myopic laser vision corrections were enrolled in this prospective study from two eye centers. Corneal thickness and power were measured by Fourier-domain OCT. Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and automated keratometry were measured by a partial coherence interferometer. An OCT-based IOL formula was developed. The mean absolute error of the OCT-based formula in predicting postoperative refraction was compared to two regression-based IOL formulae for eyes with previous laser vision correction. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes of 46 patients all had uncomplicated cataract surgery with monofocal IOL implantation. The mean arithmetic prediction error of postoperative refraction was 0.05 ± 0.65 diopter (D) for the OCT formula, 0.14 ± 0.83 D for the Haigis-L formula, and 0.24 ± 0.82 D for the no-history Shammas-PL formula. The mean absolute error was 0.50 D for OCT compared to a mean absolute error of 0.67 D for Haigis-L and 0.67 D for Shammas-PL. The adjusted mean absolute error (average prediction error removed) was 0.49 D for OCT, 0.65 D for Haigis-L (P=.031), and 0.62 D for Shammas-PL (P=.044). For OCT, 61% of the eyes were within 0.5 D of prediction error, whereas 46% were within 0.5 D for both Haigis-L and Shammas-PL (P=.034). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive accuracy of OCT-based IOL power calculation was better than Haigis-L and Shammas-PL formulas in eyes after laser vision correction.
PURPOSE: To use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to measure corneal power and improve the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power in cataract surgeries after laser vision correction. METHODS:Patients with previous myopic laser vision corrections were enrolled in this prospective study from two eye centers. Corneal thickness and power were measured by Fourier-domain OCT. Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and automated keratometry were measured by a partial coherence interferometer. An OCT-based IOL formula was developed. The mean absolute error of the OCT-based formula in predicting postoperative refraction was compared to two regression-based IOL formulae for eyes with previous laser vision correction. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes of 46 patients all had uncomplicated cataract surgery with monofocal IOL implantation. The mean arithmetic prediction error of postoperative refraction was 0.05 ± 0.65 diopter (D) for the OCT formula, 0.14 ± 0.83 D for the Haigis-L formula, and 0.24 ± 0.82 D for the no-history Shammas-PL formula. The mean absolute error was 0.50 D for OCT compared to a mean absolute error of 0.67 D for Haigis-L and 0.67 D for Shammas-PL. The adjusted mean absolute error (average prediction error removed) was 0.49 D for OCT, 0.65 D for Haigis-L (P=.031), and 0.62 D for Shammas-PL (P=.044). For OCT, 61% of the eyes were within 0.5 D of prediction error, whereas 46% were within 0.5 D for both Haigis-L and Shammas-PL (P=.034). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive accuracy of OCT-based IOL power calculation was better than Haigis-L and Shammas-PL formulas in eyes after laser vision correction.
Authors: E Moreno-Barriuso; J M Lloves; S Marcos; R Navarro; L Llorente; S Barbero Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Elena Rochtchina; Bickol N Mukesh; Jie Jin Wang; Cathy A McCarty; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Sergio Sónego-Krone; Gerson López-Moreno; Oscar V Beaujon-Balbi; Carlos G Arce; Paulo Schor; Mauro Campos Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-02
Authors: Robert A Latkany; Amit R Chokshi; Mark G Speaker; Jodi Abramson; Barrie D Soloway; Guopei Yu Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Chung Shen Chean; Boon Kang Aw Yong; Samuel Comely; Deena Maleedy; Stephen Kaye; Mark Batterbury; Vito Romano; Esmaeil Arbabi; Victor Hu Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2019-04-09
Authors: Jack X Ma; Maolong Tang; Li Wang; Mitchell P Weikert; David Huang; Douglas D Koch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799