Literature DB >> 22382654

Prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit: prospective study on 70 patients.

H Azaïs1, C Jean Charles, P Delporte, P Debodinance.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to examine the anatomical and functional results of prolapse repair by a vaginal approach using the Elevate kit.
METHODS: This was a prospective study of 70 patients presenting with symptomatic urogenital prolapse. Twenty Elevate Anterior, 16 Posterior, and 34 Anterior and Posterior repair systems were placed. Perioperative and postoperative complications were assessed. The patients were interviewed at 2 months and 1 year post-surgery.
RESULTS: Recurrences were recorded in 21 patients (31.3%) at the 1-year follow-up. However, at the 1-year follow-up, there were 14 cases (20.9%) of direct recurrence (two anterior, two posterior, and ten combined anterior and posterior) compared with seven cases (10.4%) of indirect recurrence. Of the 21 failures (stage ≥ 2), 13 were stage 2 with the leading edge above the hymen. None of the patients underwent revision surgery. The exposure rate was 4.5%. The anterior and posterior shrinkage rates were 68.7% and 31.9%, respectively. There were four cases of de novo dyspareunia. Patients reported a significant decrease in the impact of pelvic floor distress on the PFIQ-7 questionnaire, but an improvement on the PFDI-20. There was no improvement in sexual function (PISQ-12).
CONCLUSIONS: The Elevate™ kit is associated with satisfactory functional results. However, the anatomical results require ongoing evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22382654     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1673-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  35 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcome and urodynamic findings using "Perigee and/or Apogee" versus "Prolift anterior and/or posterior" system devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Long; Chun-Shuo Hsu; Mei-Yu Jang; Cheng-Min Liu; Po-Hui Chiang; Eing-Mei Tsai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Foreign body reactions to monofilament and braided polypropylene mesh used as preperitoneal implants in pigs.

Authors:  G L Beets; P M Go; H van Mameren
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-10

3.  Complications of vaginal mesh: our experience.

Authors:  Bernard Jacquetin; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-10

Review 4.  Mesh augmentation during pelvic-floor reconstructive surgery: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Kaven Baessler; Christopher F Maher
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles.

Authors:  P K Sand; S Koduri; R W Lobel; H A Winkler; J Tomezsko; P J Culligan; R Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care.

Authors:  S E Swift
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.

Authors:  E C Samuelsson; F T Victor; G Tibblin; K F Svärdsudd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Effect of vaginal polypropylene mesh implants on sexual function.

Authors:  Annett Gauruder-Burmester; Pathena Koutouzidou; Ralf Tunn
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA.

Authors:  Aparna D Shah; Neeraj Kohli; Sujatha S Rajan; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-20

10.  Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  M Abdel-Fattah; I Ramsay
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  5 in total

1.  Self-retaining support implant: an anchorless system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Gil Levy; Anna Padoa; Zoltan Fekete; George Bartfai; Laszlo Pajor; Mauro Cervigni
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Evaluation of the single-incision Elevate system to treat pelvic organ prolapse: follow-up from 15 to 45 months.

Authors:  Kuan-Hui Huang; Li-Yi Huang; Li-Ching Chu; Fei-Chi Chuang; Ming-Ping Wu; Fu-Tsai Kung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Comparison between Elevate anterior/apical system and Perigee system in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: clinical and sonographic outcomes.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Nazura Bt Karim; Eileen Feliz M Cortes; Pei-Ying Wu; Yi-Hao Lin; Yiap Loong Tan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The impact of transvaginal, mesh-augmented level one apical repair on anorectal dysfunction due to pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  M Himmler; K Göttl; M Witczak; A Yassouridis; D M Gold; B Liedl
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 1.932

5.  Outcomes of trocar-guided Gynemesh PS™ versus single-incision trocarless Polyform™ transvaginal mesh procedures.

Authors:  Maryse Larouche; Lisa Merovitz; José A Correa; Jens-Erik Walter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.