Literature DB >> 25257810

Comparison between Elevate anterior/apical system and Perigee system in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: clinical and sonographic outcomes.

Tsia-Shu Lo1, Nazura Bt Karim, Eileen Feliz M Cortes, Pei-Ying Wu, Yi-Hao Lin, Yiap Loong Tan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and sonographic features of implanted transvaginal mesh in continent women treated with Elevate(™) anterior/apical [single-incision mesh (SIM-A)] or Perigee(™) [transvaginal mesh with sacrospinous fixation (TVM + SSF)] in extensive pelvic organ reconstruction surgery.
METHODS: This prospective observational study was done from May 2010 to January 2013. Patients were recruited from two tertiary centers, and the Elevate(™) and Perigee(™) systems were compared. Patients who had overt or occult SUI, previous prolapse or mesh insertion were excluded. RESULT: Fifty-seven patients in the SIM-A group and sixty-one in the TVM + SSF group were analysed. All completed a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Groups were demographically and statistically similar. There was a significantly high incidence of de novo SUI postoperatively in the SIM-A group. The objective and subjective cure rate of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were comparable between groups, with incidence of mesh erosion in the SIM-A group and three in the TVM + SSF group. Sonographic evaluation showed significant increase in mesh length in the SIM-A group.
CONCLUSION: Elevate(™) a offered lower incidence of mesh erosion and comparable results on anatomical POP correction; however, incidence of de novo SUI was high. There is an apparent lengthening of implanted Elevate® mesh sonographically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25257810     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2492-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  26 in total

1.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Validation of a Chinese version of the short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Su; Hui-Hsuan Lau
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit: prospective study on 70 patients.

Authors:  H Azaïs; C Jean Charles; P Delporte; P Debodinance
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Combined anterior trans-obturator mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in women with severe prolapse--a case series of 30 months follow-up.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Kiran Ashok
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  One-year outcome of concurrent anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh surgery for treatment of advanced urogenital prolapse: case series.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair.

Authors:  John T Wei; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Charles W Nager; Matthew D Barber; Kim Kenton; Cindy L Amundsen; Joseph Schaffer; Susan F Meikle; Cathie Spino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Can de novo stress incontinence after anterior wall repair be predicted?

Authors:  Anna Marie Ellström Engh; Ann Ekeryd; Asa Magnusson; Ingegerd Olsson; Lena Otterlind; Gun Tobiasson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  The risk of developing urinary stress-incontinence after vaginal repair in continent women. A clinical and urodynamic follow-up study.

Authors:  E Borstad; T Rud
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Long-term outcomes of synthetic transobturator nonabsorbable anterior mesh versus anterior colporrhaphy in symptomatic, advanced pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Leng Boi Pue; Yiap Loong Tan; Pei-Ying Wu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  M Abdel-Fattah; I Ramsay
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  13 in total

1.  A retrospective comparison of two vaginal mesh kits in the management of anterior and apical vaginal prolapse: long-term results for apical fixation and quality of life.

Authors:  Gery Lamblin; Chloé Gouttenoire; Laure Panel; Stéphanie Moret; Gautier Chene; Christophe Courtieu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.

Authors:  Valérie To; Pattaya Hengrasmee; Alan Lam; Georgina Luscombe; Anna Lawless; Justin Lam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Predictors of voiding dysfunction following extensive vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Nagashu Shailaja; Wu-Chiao Hsieh; Ma Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio; Faridah Mohd Yusoff; Rami Ibrahim
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Predictors for de novo stress urinary incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Nazura Bt Karim; Enie Akhtar Nawawi; Pei-Ying Wu; Zalina Nusee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh: intermediate results of a cohort study.

Authors:  Vincent Letouzey; Daniela Ulrich; Eva Balenbois; Arnaud Cornille; Renaud de Tayrac; Brigitte Fatton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Urodynamic profile of voiding in patients with pelvic organ prolapse after surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danilo Budib Lourenço; Hugo Octaviano Duarte-Santos; Alexandre Dib Partezani; Saulo Borborema Teles; Bianca Bianco; Luis Augusto Seabra Rios; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Arie Carneiro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Leng Boi Pue; Yiap Loong Tan; Wu-Chiao Hsieh; Chuan Chi Kao; Ma Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome?

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Ma Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio; Wu-Chiao Hsieh; Ju-Chun Yang; Shih Yin Huang; Sandy Chua
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Prophylactic midurethral sling insertion during transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery for advanced prolapse patients with high-risk predictors of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Sandy Chua; Chuan Chi Kao; Wu-Chiao Hsieh; Ming-Ping Wu; Ling-Hong Tseng
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Predictors for persistent urodynamic stress incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery with and without midurethral sling.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Enie Akhtar Nawawi; Pei-Ying Wu; Nazura bt Karim; Ahlam Al-Kharabsheh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.