OBJECTIVES: To characterize the ability of high-intensity focused ultrasound to achieve thrombolysis in vitro and investigate the feasibility of this approach as a means of restoring blood flow in thrombus-occluded arteries in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee. Thrombolysis was performed with a 1.51-MHz focused ultrasound transducer with pulse lengths of 0.1 to 10 milliseconds and acoustic powers up to 300 W. In vitro experiments were performed with blood clots formed from rabbit arterial blood and situated in 2-mm diameter tubing. Both single location and flow bypass recanalization experiments were conducted. In vitro clot erosion was assessed with 30-MHz ultrasound, with debris size measured with filters and a Coulter counter. In vivo clots were initiated in the femoral arteries of rabbits (n = 26). Cavitation signals from bubbles formed during exposure were monitored. In vivo flow restoration was assessed with 23-MHz Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: At a single location, in vitro clot erosion volumes increased with exposure power and pulse length, with debris size reducing with increasing pulse length. Flow bypass experiments achieved 99.2% clot erosion with 1.1% of debris above 0.5 mm in size. In vivo, 10 milliseconds pulses were associated with bleeding, but at 1 millisecond, it was feasible to achieve partial flow restoration in 6 of the 10 clots with only 1 of the 10 showing evidence of bleeding. In all cases, thrombolysis occurred only in the presence of cavitation. CONCLUSION: High-intensity focused ultrasound thrombolysis is feasible as a means of restoring partial blood flow in thrombus-occluded arteries in the absence of thrombolytic agents. The potential for bleeding with this approach requires further investigation.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the ability of high-intensity focused ultrasound to achieve thrombolysis in vitro and investigate the feasibility of this approach as a means of restoring blood flow in thrombus-occluded arteries in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee. Thrombolysis was performed with a 1.51-MHz focused ultrasound transducer with pulse lengths of 0.1 to 10 milliseconds and acoustic powers up to 300 W. In vitro experiments were performed with blood clots formed from rabbit arterial blood and situated in 2-mm diameter tubing. Both single location and flow bypass recanalization experiments were conducted. In vitro clot erosion was assessed with 30-MHz ultrasound, with debris size measured with filters and a Coulter counter. In vivo clots were initiated in the femoral arteries of rabbits (n = 26). Cavitation signals from bubbles formed during exposure were monitored. In vivo flow restoration was assessed with 23-MHz Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: At a single location, in vitro clot erosion volumes increased with exposure power and pulse length, with debris size reducing with increasing pulse length. Flow bypass experiments achieved 99.2% clot erosion with 1.1% of debris above 0.5 mm in size. In vivo, 10 milliseconds pulses were associated with bleeding, but at 1 millisecond, it was feasible to achieve partial flow restoration in 6 of the 10 clots with only 1 of the 10 showing evidence of bleeding. In all cases, thrombolysis occurred only in the presence of cavitation. CONCLUSION: High-intensity focused ultrasound thrombolysis is feasible as a means of restoring partial blood flow in thrombus-occluded arteries in the absence of thrombolytic agents. The potential for bleeding with this approach requires further investigation.
Authors: A I Qureshi; J F Kirmani; M A Sayed; A Safdar; S Ahmed; R Ferguson; L A Hershey; K J Qazi Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-06-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stefan Pfaffenberger; Branka Devcic-Kuhar; Stefan P Kastl; Kurt Huber; Gerald Maurer; Johann Wojta; Michael Gottsauner-Wolf Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Saurabh Datta; Constantin-C Coussios; Louis E McAdory; Jun Tan; Tyrone Porter; Gabrielle De Courten-Myers; Christy K Holland Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Wade S Smith; Gene Sung; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver; Chelsea S Kidwell; Y Pierre Gobin; Helmi L Lutsep; Gary M Nesbit; Thomas Grobelny; Marilyn M Rymer; Isaac E Silverman; Randall T Higashida; Ronald F Budzik; Michael P Marks Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Zhen Xu; Mekhala Raghavan; Timothy L Hall; Ching-Wei Chang; Mary-Ann Mycek; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Victor Frenkel; Jay Oberoi; Michael J Stone; Melissa Park; Cheri Deng; Bradford J Wood; Ziv Neeman; McDonald Horne; King C P Li Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jie Pan; Angelos-Aristeidis Konstas; Brian Bateman; Girolamo A Ortolano; John Pile-Spellman Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Tyler Gerhardson; Jonathan R Sukovich; Aditya S Pandey; Timothy L Hall; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Francesco Prada; M Yashar S Kalani; Kaan Yagmurlu; Pedro Norat; Massimiliano Del Bene; Francesco DiMeco; Neal F Kassell Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Nicholas T Blum; Ciara M Gyorkos; Spencer J Narowetz; Evan N Mueller; Andrew P Goodwin Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Thomas Looi; Karolina Piorkowska; Charles Mougenot; Adam Waspe; Kullervo Hynynen; James Drake Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Xi Zhang; Gabe E Owens; Charles A Cain; Hitinder S Gurm; Jonathan Macoskey; Zhen Xu Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Aiwei Shi; Jonathan Lundt; Zilin Deng; Jonathan Macoskey; Hitinder Gurm; Gabe Owens; Xi Zhang; Timothy L Hall; Zhen Xu Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2018-09-30 Impact factor: 2.998