BACKGROUND: Although associations between maternal parity and birth defects have been observed previously, few studies have focused on the possibility that parity is an independent risk factor for birth defects. We investigated the relation between levels of parity and a range of birth defects, adjusting each defect group for the same covariates. METHODS: We included infants who had an estimated delivery date between 1997 and 2007 and participated in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multisite case-control study. Cases included infants or fetuses belonging to 38 phenotypes of birth defects (n = 17,908), and controls included infants who were unaffected by a major birth defect (n = 7173). Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for 12 covariates using logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with primiparous mothers, nulliparous mothers were more likely to have infants with amniotic band sequence, hydrocephaly, esophageal atresia, hypospadias, limb reduction deficiencies, diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, tetralogy of Fallot, and septal cardiac defects, with significant ORs (1.2 to 2.3). Compared with primiparous mothers, multiparous mothers had a significantly increased risk of omphalocele, with an OR of 1.5, but had significantly decreased risk of hypospadias and limb reduction deficiencies, with ORs of 0.77 and 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparity was associated with an increased risk of specific phenotypes of birth defects. Most of the phenotypes associated with nulliparity in this study were consistent with those identified by previous studies. Research into biologic or environmental factors that are associated with nulliparity may be helpful in explaining some or all of these associations.
BACKGROUND: Although associations between maternal parity and birth defects have been observed previously, few studies have focused on the possibility that parity is an independent risk factor for birth defects. We investigated the relation between levels of parity and a range of birth defects, adjusting each defect group for the same covariates. METHODS: We included infants who had an estimated delivery date between 1997 and 2007 and participated in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multisite case-control study. Cases included infants or fetuses belonging to 38 phenotypes of birth defects (n = 17,908), and controls included infants who were unaffected by a major birth defect (n = 7173). Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for 12 covariates using logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with primiparous mothers, nulliparous mothers were more likely to have infants with amniotic band sequence, hydrocephaly, esophageal atresia, hypospadias, limb reduction deficiencies, diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, tetralogy of Fallot, and septal cardiac defects, with significant ORs (1.2 to 2.3). Compared with primiparous mothers, multiparous mothers had a significantly increased risk of omphalocele, with an OR of 1.5, but had significantly decreased risk of hypospadias and limb reduction deficiencies, with ORs of 0.77 and 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparity was associated with an increased risk of specific phenotypes of birth defects. Most of the phenotypes associated with nulliparity in this study were consistent with those identified by previous studies. Research into biologic or environmental factors that are associated with nulliparity may be helpful in explaining some or all of these associations.
Authors: Eden R Rauch; John C Smulian; Kristin DePrince; Cande V Ananth; Stephen W Marcella Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Bonna G Benjamin; Mary K Ethen; Catherine L Van Hook; Candace A Myers; Mark A Canfield Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2010-03
Authors: Adolfo Correa; Suzanne M Gilboa; Lilah M Besser; Lorenzo D Botto; Cynthia A Moore; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mario A Cleves; Tiffany J Riehle-Colarusso; D Kim Waller; E Albert Reece Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Regina M Simeone; Sarah C Tinker; Suzanne M Gilboa; A J Agopian; Matthew E Oster; Owen J Devine; Margaret A Honein Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Erin B Stallings; Jennifer L Isenburg; Tyiesha D Short; Dominique Heinke; Russell S Kirby; Paul A Romitti; Mark A Canfield; Leslie A O'Leary; Rebecca F Liberman; Nina E Forestieri; Wendy N Nembhard; Theresa Sandidge; Eirini Nestoridi; Jason L Salemi; Amy E Nance; Kirstan Duckett; Glenda M Ramirez; Xiaoyi Shan; Jing Shi; Philip J Lupo Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Regina M Simeone; Owen J Devine; Jessica A Marcinkevage; Suzanne M Gilboa; Hilda Razzaghi; Barbara H Bardenheier; Andrea J Sharma; Margaret A Honein Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Charles J Billington; Brian Schmidt; Lei Zhang; James S Hodges; Michael K Georgieff; Gunnar Schotta; Rajaram Gopalakrishnan; Anna Petryk Journal: J Nutr Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Daniela V Luquetti; Babette S Saltzman; Jorge Lopez-Camelo; Maria da Graça Dutra; Eduardo E Castilla Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2013-11
Authors: Wendy N Nembhard; Jorieke E H Bergman; Maria D Politis; Jazmín Arteaga-Vázquez; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Mark A Canfield; Janet D Cragan; Saeed Dastgiri; Hermien E K de Walle; Marcia L Feldkamp; Amy Nance; Miriam Gatt; Boris Groisman; Paula Hurtado-Villa; Kärin Kallén; Danielle Landau; Nathalie Lelong; Jorge Lopez-Camelo; Laura Martinez; Margery Morgan; Anna Pierini; Anke Rissmann; Antonin Šípek; Elena Szabova; Giovanna Tagliabue; Wladimir Wertelecki; Ignacio Zarante; Marian K Bakker; Vijaya Kancherla; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 2.661
Authors: Yu Feng; Di Yu; Tao Chen; Jin Liu; Xing Tong; Lei Yang; Min Da; Shutong Shen; Changfeng Fan; Song Wang; Xuming Mo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 3.240