Regina M Simeone1, Owen J Devine2, Jessica A Marcinkevage3, Suzanne M Gilboa2, Hilda Razzaghi3, Barbara H Bardenheier4, Andrea J Sharma5, Margaret A Honein2. 1. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Electronic address: rsimeone@cdc.gov. 2. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. 3. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 4. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. 5. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Maternal pregestational diabetes (PGDM) is a risk factor for development of congenital heart defects (CHDs). Glycemic control before pregnancy reduces the risk of CHDs. A meta-analysis was used to estimate summary ORs and mathematical modeling was used to estimate population attributable fractions (PAFs) and the annual number of CHDs in the U.S. potentially preventable by establishing glycemic control before pregnancy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the literature through December 2012 was conducted in 2012 and 2013. Case-control or cohort studies were included. Data were abstracted from 12 studies for a meta-analysis of all CHDs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Summary estimates of the association between PGDM and CHDs and 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) were developed using Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses for all CHDs and specific CHD subtypes. Posterior estimates of this association were combined with estimates of CHD prevalence to produce estimates of PAFs and annual prevented cases. Ninety-five percent uncertainty intervals (95% UIs) for estimates of the annual number of preventable cases were developed using Monte Carlo simulation. Analyses were conducted in 2013. The summary OR estimate for the association between PGDM and CHDs was 3.8 (95% CrI=3.0, 4.9). Approximately 2670 (95% UI=1795, 3795) cases of CHDs could potentially be prevented annually if all women in the U.S. with PGDM achieved glycemic control before pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates from this analysis suggest that preconception care of women with PGDM could have a measureable impact by reducing the number of infants born with CHDs. Published by Elsevier Inc.
CONTEXT: Maternal pregestational diabetes (PGDM) is a risk factor for development of congenital heart defects (CHDs). Glycemic control before pregnancy reduces the risk of CHDs. A meta-analysis was used to estimate summary ORs and mathematical modeling was used to estimate population attributable fractions (PAFs) and the annual number of CHDs in the U.S. potentially preventable by establishing glycemic control before pregnancy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the literature through December 2012 was conducted in 2012 and 2013. Case-control or cohort studies were included. Data were abstracted from 12 studies for a meta-analysis of all CHDs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Summary estimates of the association between PGDM and CHDs and 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) were developed using Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses for all CHDs and specific CHD subtypes. Posterior estimates of this association were combined with estimates of CHD prevalence to produce estimates of PAFs and annual prevented cases. Ninety-five percent uncertainty intervals (95% UIs) for estimates of the annual number of preventable cases were developed using Monte Carlo simulation. Analyses were conducted in 2013. The summary OR estimate for the association between PGDM and CHDs was 3.8 (95% CrI=3.0, 4.9). Approximately 2670 (95% UI=1795, 3795) cases of CHDs could potentially be prevented annually if all women in the U.S. with PGDM achieved glycemic control before pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates from this analysis suggest that preconception care of women with PGDM could have a measureable impact by reducing the number of infants born with CHDs. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Quanhe Yang; Huichao Chen; Adolfo Correa; Owen Devine; T J Mathews; Margaret A Honein Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2006-10
Authors: B M Sibai; S N Caritis; J C Hauth; C MacPherson; J P VanDorsten; M Klebanoff; M Landon; R H Paul; P J Meis; M Miodovnik; M P Dombrowski; G R Thurnau; A H Moawad; J Roberts Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Roman Starikov; Justin Bohrer; William Goh; Melissa Kuwahara; Edward K Chien; Vrishali Lopes; Donald Coustan Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Adolfo Correa; Suzanne M Gilboa; Lilah M Besser; Lorenzo D Botto; Cynthia A Moore; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mario A Cleves; Tiffany J Riehle-Colarusso; D Kim Waller; E Albert Reece Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Alan Fung; Cedric Manlhiot; Sapna Naik; Herschel Rosenberg; John Smythe; Jane Lougheed; Tapas Mondal; David Chitayat; Brian W McCrindle; Seema Mital Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Regina M Simeone; Sarah C Tinker; Suzanne M Gilboa; A J Agopian; Matthew E Oster; Owen J Devine; Margaret A Honein Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 3.797