Literature DB >> 22371180

Report from the European Myeloma Network on interphase FISH in multiple myeloma and related disorders.

Fiona M Ross1, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Geneviève Ameye, Norma C Gutiérrez, Peter Liebisch, Sheila O'Connor, Klara Dalva, Sonia Fabris, Adele M Testi, Marie Jarosova, Clare Hodkinson, Anna Collin, Gitte Kerndrup, Petr Kuglik, Dariusz Ladon, Paolo Bernasconi, Brigitte Maes, Zuzana Zemanova, Kyra Michalova, Lucienne Michau, Kai Neben, N Emil U Hermansen, Katrina Rack, Alberto Rocci, Rebecca Protheroe, Laura Chiecchio, Hélène A Poirel, Pieter Sonneveld, Mette Nyegaard, Hans E Johnsen.   

Abstract

The European Myeloma Network has organized two workshops on fluorescence in situ hybridization in multiple myeloma. The first aimed to identify specific indications and consensus technical approaches of current practice. A second workshop followed a quality control exercise in which 21 laboratories analyzed diagnostic cases of purified plasma cells for recurrent abnormalities. The summary report was discussed at the EHA Myeloma Scientific Working Group Meeting 2010. During the quality control exercise, there was acceptable agreement on more than 1,000 tests. The conclusions from the exercise were that the primary clinical applications for FISH analysis were for newly diagnosed cases of MM or frank relapse cases. A range of technical recommendations included: 1) material should be part of the first draw of the aspirate; 2) samples should be sent at suitable times to allow for the lengthy processing procedure; 3) most importantly, PCs must be purified or specifically identified; 4) positive cut-off levels should be relatively conservative: 10% for fusion or break-apart probes, 20% for numerical abnormalities; 5) informative probes should be combined to best effect; 6) in specialist laboratories, a single experienced analyst is considered adequate; 7) at least 100 PC should be scored; 8) essential abnormalities to test for are t(4;14), t(14;16) and 17p13 deletions; 9) suitable commercial probes should be available for clinically relevant abnormalities; 10) the clinical report should be expressed clearly and must state the percentage of PC involved and the method used for identification; 11) a retrospective European based FISH data bank linked to clinical data should be generated; and 12) prospective analysis should be centralized for upcoming trials based on the recommendations made. The European Myeloma Network aims to build on these recommendations to establish standards for a common European data base to define subgroups with prognostic significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22371180      PMCID: PMC3409827          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.056176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  21 in total

1.  Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization studies in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Norma C Gutiérrez; Jordi Camps; Jesús M Hernández; Juan L García; Esther Prat; M Belén González; Rosa Miró; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Hematol J       Date:  2003

2.  Dysregulation of cyclin D1 by translocation into an IgH gamma switch region in two multiple myeloma cell lines.

Authors:  M Chesi; P L Bergsagel; L A Brents; C M Smith; D S Gerhard; W M Kuehl
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Promiscuous translocations into immunoglobulin heavy chain switch regions in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P L Bergsagel; M Chesi; E Nardini; L A Brents; S L Kirby; W M Kuehl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Chromosome translocations in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P L Bergsagel; W M Kuehl
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-09-10       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  Critical roles for immunoglobulin translocations and cyclin D dysregulation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; W Michael Kuehl
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.988

6.  Genomic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Richard J Bailey; Gregory J Ahmann; S Vincent Rajkumar; James D Hoyer; John A Lust; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Gordon W Dewald
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies chromosomal abnormalities in plasma cells from patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  J Drach; J Angerler; J Schuster; C Rothermundt; R Thalhammer; O A Haas; U Jäger; M Fiegl; K Geissler; H Ludwig; H Huber
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  The recurrent IgH translocations are highly associated with nonhyperdiploid variant multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Carina S Debes-Marun; Elisa B Picken; Gordon W Dewald; Sandra C Bryant; Jerry M Winkler; Emily Blood; Martin M Oken; Rafael Santana-Dávila; Natalia González-Paz; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Bart Barlogie; Regis Bataille; Christian Bastard; P Leif Bergsagel; Marta Chesi; Faith E Davies; Johannes Drach; Philip R Greipp; Ilan R Kirsch; W Michael Kuehl; Jesus M Hernandez; Stephane Minvielle; Linda M Pilarski; John D Shaughnessy; A Keith Stewart; Herve Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial.

Authors:  K D Boyd; F M Ross; L Chiecchio; G P Dagrada; Z J Konn; W J Tapper; B A Walker; C P Wardell; W M Gregory; A J Szubert; S E Bell; J A Child; G H Jackson; F E Davies; G J Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  81 in total

1.  Chromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic value.

Authors:  Gang An; Yan Xu; Lihui Shi; Zhong Shizhen; Shuhui Deng; Zhenqing Xie; Weiwei Sui; Fenghuang Zhan; Lugui Qiu
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Secretory status of monoclonal immunoglobulin is related to the outcome of patients with myeloma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xiao-Qi Qin; Gang An; Zeng-Jun Li; Lan-Ting Liu; Yan Xu; Lin-Hua Yang; Yan-Ping Ma; Shu-Hui Deng; Wei-Wei Sui; Yu Qin; Xiao-Yan Feng; Mei-Rong Zang; Wen-Juan Yang; Yan-Ru Zhang; Shu-Hua Yi; Ting-Yu Wang; Rui Lv; De-Hui Zou; Yao-Zhong Zhao; Lu-Gui Qiu
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-03-12

3.  Combined DNA-RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to study X chromosome inactivation in differentiated female mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Joost Gribnau
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement for the management, treatment, and supportive care of patients with myeloma not eligible for standard autologous stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesus F San Miguel; Alessandra Larocca; Ruben Niesvizky; Gareth Morgan; Ola Landgren; Roman Hajek; Hermann Einsele; Kenneth C Anderson; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Paul G Richardson; Michele Cavo; Andrew Spencer; A Keith Stewart; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Sagar Lonial; Pieter Sonneveld; Brian G M Durie; Philippe Moreau; Robert Z Orlowski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with hyperdiploid multiple myeloma: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Adrian A Carballo-Zarate; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Lianghua Fang; Jatin J Shah; Donna M Weber; Sheeba K Thomas; Elisabet E Manasanch; Suyang Hao; Qi Shen; Robert Z Orlowski; Pei Lin; Xinyan Lu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  Evolutionary biology of high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Charlotte Pawlyn; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  IKZF1 expression is a prognostic marker in newly diagnosed standard-risk multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and intensive chemotherapy: a study of the German Myeloma Study Group (DSMM).

Authors:  J Krönke; F Kuchenbauer; M Kull; V Teleanu; L Bullinger; D Bunjes; A Greiner; S Kolmus; S Köpff; M Schreder; L-O Mügge; C Straka; M Engelhardt; H Döhner; H Einsele; F Bassermann; R Bargou; S Knop; C Langer
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  The myeloma stem cell concept, revisited: from phenomenology to operational terms.

Authors:  Hans Erik Johnsen; Martin Bøgsted; Alexander Schmitz; Julie Støve Bødker; Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly; Preben Johansen; Peter Valent; Niklas Zojer; Els Van Valckenborgh; Karin Vanderkerken; Mark van Duin; Pieter Sonneveld; Martin Perez-Andres; Alberto Orfao; Karen Dybkær
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Multiple Myeloma: Treatment is Getting Individualized.

Authors:  M B Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 0.900

10.  Hyperhaploidy is a novel high-risk cytogenetic subgroup in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J R Sawyer; E Tian; J D Shaughnessy; J Epstein; C M Swanson; C Stangeby; C L Hale; L Parr; M Lynn; G Sammartino; J L Lukacs; C Stein; C Bailey; M Zangari; F E Davies; F Van Rhee; B Barlogie; G J Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.