Literature DB >> 24213147

Chromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic value.

Gang An1, Yan Xu, Lihui Shi, Zhong Shizhen, Shuhui Deng, Zhenqing Xie, Weiwei Sui, Fenghuang Zhan, Lugui Qiu.   

Abstract

Chromosome 1q21 aberrations have not been yet been made part of routine clinical tests and their effect in multiple myeloma is still under investigation. The prognostic value of copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have remained unclear. In the present study, we analyzed the prognostic value of 1q21 in a series of 290 cases of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated in a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial (BDH 2008/02). We found that incidence of 1q21 aberration increased at relapse, but its copy numbers and proportion of cells involved did not change. Gains of 1q21 had no impact on survival in patients receiving thalidomide-based treatment but conferred a significantly inferior prognosis in patients under bortezomib-based chemotherapy and was an independent adverse prognostic factor for progression free survival (HR 3.831; 95%CI: 2.125-6.907; P<0.001) and overall survival (HR 3.245; 95%CI: 1.555-6.773; P=0.002). Strikingly, our results showed that the copy number variation and clone size harboring 1q21 gains carried no additional prognostic value and patients with 1q21 gains did not benefit significantly from regimens incorporating bortezomib. Our results indicate that three copies of 1q21 and 20% of plasma cells with this abnormality were enough to confer bortezomib resistance. Therefore, chromosome 1q21 gains should be considered a high-risk feature in multiple myeloma receiving bortezomib therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24213147      PMCID: PMC3912967          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.088211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  24 in total

1.  Prognostic value of chromosome 1q21 gain by fluorescent in situ hybridization and increase CKS1B expression in myeloma.

Authors:  R Fonseca; S A Van Wier; W J Chng; R Ketterling; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; P L Bergsagel; S V Rajkumar; P R Greipp; M R Litzow; T Price-Troska; K J Henderson; G J Ahmann; M A Gertz
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Extensive immunoglobulin production sensitizes myeloma cells for proteasome inhibition.

Authors:  Silke Meister; Ulrich Schubert; Kirsten Neubert; Kai Herrmann; Renate Burger; Martin Gramatzki; Sabine Hahn; Sandra Schreiber; Sabine Wilhelm; Martin Herrmann; Hans-Martin Jäck; Reinhard E Voll
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Clinical outcomes in t(4;14) multiple myeloma: a chemotherapy-sensitive disease characterized by rapid relapse and alkylating agent resistance.

Authors:  Wilfrid Jaksic; Suzanne Trudel; Hong Chang; Young Trieu; Xi Qi; Joseph Mikhael; Donna Reece; Christine Chen; A Keith Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  CKS1B, overexpressed in aggressive disease, regulates multiple myeloma growth and survival through SKP2- and p27Kip1-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Fenghuang Zhan; Simona Colla; Xiaosong Wu; Bangzheng Chen; James P Stewart; W Michael Kuehl; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Frequent gain of chromosome band 1q21 in plasma-cell dyscrasias detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization: incidence increases from MGUS to relapsed myeloma and is related to prognosis and disease progression following tandem stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Ichiro Hanamura; James P Stewart; Yongsheng Huang; Fenghuang Zhan; Madhumita Santra; Jeffrey R Sawyer; Klaus Hollmig; Maurizio Zangarri; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Frits van Rhee; Federica Cavallo; Bart Burington; John Crowley; Guido Tricot; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Testing standard and genetic parameters in 220 patients with multiple myeloma with complete data sets: superiority of molecular genetics.

Authors:  John D Shaughnessy; Jeffrey Haessler; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Michele Cottler-Fox; Klaus Hollmig; Maurizio Zangari; Abid Mohiuddin; Yazan Alsayed; Monica Grazziutti; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  A SNP microarray and FISH-based procedure to detect allelic imbalances in multiple myeloma: an integrated genomics approach reveals a wide gene dosage effect.

Authors:  Luca Agnelli; Laura Mosca; Sonia Fabris; Marta Lionetti; Adrian Andronache; Ivo Kwee; Katia Todoerti; Donata Verdelli; Cristina Battaglia; Francesco Bertoni; Giorgio Lambertenghi Deliliers; Antonino Neri
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Clinically relevant end points and new drug approvals for myeloma.

Authors:  K C Anderson; R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar; A K Stewart; D Weber; P Richardson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Prognostic significance of copy-number alterations in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Cheng Li; Florence Magrangeas; Wilfried Gouraud; Catherine Charbonnel; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Michel Attal; Gerald Marit; Claire Mathiot; Thierry Facon; Philippe Moreau; Kenneth C Anderson; Loïc Campion; Nikhil C Munshi; Stéphane Minvielle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Integration of global SNP-based mapping and expression arrays reveals key regions, mechanisms, and genes important in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Paola E Leone; Matthew W Jenner; Cheng Li; David Gonzalez; David C Johnson; Fiona M Ross; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  50 in total

1.  Gain of chromosome 1q portends worse prognosis in multiple myeloma despite novel agent-based induction regimens and autologous transplantation.

Authors:  Gunjan L Shah; Heather Landau; Dory Londono; Sean M Devlin; Satyajit Kosuri; Alexander M Lesokhin; Nikoletta Lendvai; Hani Hassoun; David J Chung; Guenther Koehne; Suresh C Jhanwar; Ola Landgren; Ross Levine; Sergio A Giralt
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-01-12

2.  Pleural effusion-based nomogram to predict outcomes in unselected patients with multiple myeloma: a large single center experience.

Authors:  Zi-Liang Hou; Yu Kang; Guang-Zhong Yang; Zhen Wang; Feng Wang; Yan-Xia Yu; Wen-Ming Chen; Huan-Zhong Shi
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Phase I/II trial of the oral regimen ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A Krishnan; P Kapoor; J M Palmer; N-C Tsai; S Kumar; S Lonial; M Htut; C Karanes; N Nathwani; M Rosenzweig; F Sahebi; G Somlo; L Duarte; J F Sanchez; D Auclair; S J Forman; J G Berdeja
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Metaphase cytogenetics and plasma cell proliferation index for risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Patrick W Mellors; Moritz Binder; Rhett P Ketterling; Patricia T Greipp; Linda B Baughn; Jess F Peterson; Dragan Jevremovic; Kathryn E Pearce; Francis K Buadi; Martha Q Lacy; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Suzanne R Hayman; Prashant Kapoor; Wilson I Gonsalves; Yi L Hwa; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; John A Lust; Nelson Leung; Ronald S Go; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

5.  Chromosome 1 abnormalities and survival of patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Smith Giri; Scott F Huntington; Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; Nikolai Podoltsev; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Amy J Davidoff; Natalia Neparidze
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

6.  TumorMap: Exploring the Molecular Similarities of Cancer Samples in an Interactive Portal.

Authors:  Yulia Newton; Adam M Novak; Teresa Swatloski; Duncan C McColl; Sahil Chopra; Kiley Graim; Alana S Weinstein; Robert Baertsch; Sofie R Salama; Kyle Ellrott; Manu Chopra; Theodore C Goldstein; David Haussler; Olena Morozova; Joshua M Stuart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  The impact of response kinetics for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Yuting Yan; Xuehan Mao; Jiahui Liu; Huishou Fan; Chenxing Du; Zengjun Li; Shuhua Yi; Yan Xu; Rui Lv; Wei Liu; Shuhui Deng; Weiwei Sui; Qi Wang; Dehui Zou; Jianxiang Wang; Tao Cheng; Fenghuang Zhan; Yu-Tzu Tai; Chenglu Yuan; Xin Du; Lugui Qiu; Kenneth C Anderson; Gang An
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-10-08

8.  The prognostic significance of 13q deletions of different sizes in patients with B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Shuhua Yi; Heng Li; Zengjun Li; Wenjie Xiong; Huimin Liu; Wei Liu; Rui Lv; Zhen Yu; Dehui Zou; Yan Xu; Gang An; Lugui Qiu
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q abnormalities.

Authors:  Nadine Abdallah; Patricia Greipp; Prashant Kapoor; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Linda B Baughn; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Ronald S Go; Yi L Hwa; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Yi Lin; Nelson Leung; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; Mustaqeem Siddiqui; John Lust; Robert A Kyle; Leif Bergsagel; Rhett Ketterling; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-08-11

10.  Prognostic impact of hyperdiploidy in multiple myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics: a pilot study in China.

Authors:  Jiangang Mei; Yongping Zhai; Hanqing Li; Feng Li; Xiaogang Zhou; Ping Song; Qian Zhao; Yaping Yu; Zhiming An; Liping Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.