Literature DB >> 22367399

Audiovisual time perception is spatially specific.

James Heron1, Neil W Roach, James V M Hanson, Paul V McGraw, David Whitaker.   

Abstract

Our sensory systems face a daily barrage of auditory and visual signals whose arrival times form a wide range of audiovisual asynchronies. These temporal relationships constitute an important metric for the nervous system when surmising which signals originate from common external events. Internal consistency is known to be aided by sensory adaptation: repeated exposure to consistent asynchrony brings perceived arrival times closer to simultaneity. However, given the diverse nature of our audiovisual environment, functionally useful adaptation would need to be constrained to signals that were generated together. In the current study, we investigate the role of two potential constraining factors: spatial and contextual correspondence. By employing an experimental design that allows independent control of both factors, we show that observers are able to simultaneously adapt to two opposing temporal relationships, provided they are segregated in space. No such recalibration was observed when spatial segregation was replaced by contextual stimulus features (in this case, pitch and spatial frequency). These effects provide support for dedicated asynchrony mechanisms that interact with spatially selective mechanisms early in visual and auditory sensory pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22367399      PMCID: PMC3324684          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3038-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Bimodal sensory discrimination is finer than dual single modality discrimination.

Authors:  Ansgar Koene; Derek Arnold; Alan Johnston
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial grouping resolves ambiguity to drive temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Kielan Yarrow; Warrick Roseboom; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Adaptation minimizes distance-related audiovisual delays.

Authors:  James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw; Kirill V Horoshenkov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Audio-visual speech cue combination.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Morgan Tear; Ryan Schindel; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Realignment of temporal simultaneity between vision and touch.

Authors:  Kohske Takahashi; Jun Saiki; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Resolving multisensory conflict: a strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing.

Authors:  James Heron; James V M Hanson; David Whitaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  A neural hierarchy for illusions of time: duration adaptation precedes multisensory integration.

Authors:  James Heron; John Hotchkiss; Craig Aaen-Stockdale; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  The role of epigenetic-related codes in neurocomputation: dynamic hardware in the brain.

Authors:  Lawrence Edelstein; John Smythies
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Interrelations between the perception of time and space in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Martin Riemer; Rupert Hölzl; Dieter Kleinböhl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Vincenzo Romei; Nienke van Atteveldt; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Micah M Murray; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-28

6.  Rapid, generalized adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Patrick T Goodbourn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Helen E Roberts; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Hypotheses relating to the function of the claustrum.

Authors:  John Smythies; Lawrence Edelstein; Vilayanur Ramachandran
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-02

9.  Non-retinotopic motor-visual recalibration to temporal lag.

Authors:  Masaki Tsujita; Makoto Ichikawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Motor-sensory recalibration modulates perceived simultaneity of cross-modal events at different distances.

Authors:  Brent D Parsons; Scott D Novich; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.