Literature DB >> 24306853

A neural hierarchy for illusions of time: duration adaptation precedes multisensory integration.

James Heron1, John Hotchkiss, Craig Aaen-Stockdale, Neil W Roach, David Whitaker.   

Abstract

Perceived time is inherently malleable. For example, adaptation to relatively long or short sensory events leads to a repulsive aftereffect such that subsequent events appear to be contracted or expanded (duration adaptation). Perceived visual duration can also be distorted via concurrent presentation of discrepant auditory durations (multisensory integration). The neural loci of both distortions remain unknown. In the current study we use a psychophysical approach to establish their relative positioning within the sensory processing hierarchy. We show that audiovisual integration induces marked distortions of perceived visual duration. We proceed to use these distorted durations as visual adapting stimuli yet find subsequent visual duration aftereffects to be consistent with physical rather than perceived visual duration. Conversely, the concurrent presentation of adapted auditory durations with nonadapted visual durations results in multisensory integration patterns consistent with perceived, rather than physical, auditory duration. These results demonstrate that recent sensory history modifies human duration perception prior to the combination of temporal information across sensory modalities and provides support for adaptation mechanisms mediated by duration selective neurons situated in early areas of the visual and auditory nervous system (Aubie, Sayegh, & Faure, 2012; Duysens, Schaafsma, & Orban, 1996; Leary, Edwards, & Rose, 2008).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cue combination; duration adaptation; interval tuning; multisensory integration; temporal perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24306853      PMCID: PMC3852255          DOI: 10.1167/13.14.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  45 in total

1.  Measuring time with different neural chronometers during a synchronization-continuation task.

Authors:  Hugo Merchant; Wilbert Zarco; Oswaldo Pérez; Luis Prado; Ramón Bartolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain: the influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli.

Authors:  D M Gooler; A S Feng
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates.

Authors:  David Burr; Arianna Tozzi; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Asymmetric cross-modal effects in time perception.

Authors:  Kuan-Ming Chen; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-04

5.  Audiovisual time perception is spatially specific.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; James V M Hanson; Paul V McGraw; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Temporal masking reveals properties of sound-evoked inhibition in duration-tuned neurons of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul A Faure; Thane Fremouw; John H Casseday; Ellen Covey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  TMS of posterior parietal cortex disrupts visual tactile multisensory integration.

Authors:  Siavash Pasalar; Tony Ro; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Duration tuning across vertebrates.

Authors:  Brandon Aubie; Riziq Sayegh; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural measurement of sound duration: control by excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J H Casseday; D Ehrlich; E Covey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Local inhibition shapes duration tuning in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs.

Authors:  Shankai Yin; Zhengnong Chen; Dongzhen Yu; Yanmei Feng; Jian Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  12 in total

1.  The specious interaction of time and numerosity perception.

Authors:  Irene Togoli; Michele Fornaciai; Domenica Bueti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Authors:  Aurelio Bruno; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-19

3.  The aftereffect of perceived duration is contingent on auditory frequency but not visual orientation.

Authors:  Baolin Li; Xiangyong Yuan; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.

Authors:  Kenichi Yuasa; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Duration Adaptation Occurs Across the Sub- and Supra-Second Systems.

Authors:  Shuhei Shima; Yuki Murai; Yuki Hashimoto; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-09

6.  Neural adaptation accounts for the dynamic resizing of peripersonal space: evidence from a psychophysical-computational approach.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Olaf Blanke; Elisa Magosso; Andrea Serino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The duration aftereffect does not reflect adaptation to perceived duration.

Authors:  Jim Maarseveen; Chris L E Paffen; Frans A J Verstraten; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual duration aftereffect is position invariant.

Authors:  Baolin Li; Xiangyong Yuan; Youguo Chen; Peiduo Liu; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-09

9.  Object size determines the spatial spread of visual time.

Authors:  Corinne Fulcher; Paul V McGraw; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Optimal multisensory integration leads to optimal time estimation.

Authors:  Yuki Murai; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.