Literature DB >> 22367036

Using the Genetics Concept Assessment to document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses.

Michelle K Smith1, Jennifer K Knight.   

Abstract

To help genetics instructors become aware of fundamental concepts that are persistently difficult for students, we have analyzed the evolution of student responses to multiple-choice questions from the Genetics Concept Assessment. In total, we examined pretest (before instruction) and posttest (after instruction) responses from 751 students enrolled in six genetics courses for either majors or nonmajors. Students improved on all 25 questions after instruction, but to varying degrees. Notably, there was a subgroup of nine questions for which a single incorrect answer, called the most common incorrect answer, was chosen by >20% of students on the posttest. To explore response patterns to these nine questions, we tracked individual student answers before and after instruction and found that particular conceptual difficulties about genetics are both more likely to persist and more likely to distract students than other incorrect ideas. Here we present an analysis of the evolution of these incorrect ideas to encourage instructor awareness of these genetics concepts and provide advice on how to address common conceptual difficulties in the classroom.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22367036      PMCID: PMC3338261          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.137810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  10 in total

1.  Understanding of genetic information in higher secondary students in northeast India and the implications for genetics education.

Authors:  Ansuman Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

2.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

3.  Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content.

Authors:  Kenna R Mills Shaw; Katie Van Horne; Hubert Zhang; Joann Boughman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates.

Authors:  Bethany Vice Bowling; Erin E Acra; Lihshing Wang; Melanie F Myers; Gary E Dean; Glenn C Markle; Christine L Moskalik; Carl A Huether
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith; William B Wood; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Galvanizing science departments.

Authors:  Carl Wieman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI).

Authors:  Kathy Garvin-Doxas; Michael W Klymkowsky
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Different but equal? How nonmajors and majors approach and learn genetics.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; Michelle K Smith
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-06

10.  Harnessing technology to improve formative assessment of student conceptions in STEM: forging a national network.

Authors:  Kevin C Haudek; Jennifer J Kaplan; Jennifer Knight; Tammy Long; John Merrill; Alan Munn; Ross Nehm; Michelle Smith; Mark Urban-Lurain
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

  10 in total
  24 in total

1.  Using Student Writing and Lexical Analysis to Reveal Student Thinking about the Role of Stop Codons in the Central Dogma.

Authors:  Luanna B Prevost; Michelle K Smith; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Teaching Genetics: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith; William B Wood
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  An Undergraduate Laboratory Exploring Mutational Mechanisms in Escherichia coli Based on the Luria-Delbrück Experiment.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hutchison; Abigail Scheffler; Kevin T Militello; Josephine Reinhardt; Hristina Nedelkovska; Varuni K Jamburuthugoda
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Getting to evo-devo: concepts and challenges for students learning evolutionary developmental biology.

Authors:  Anna Hiatt; Gregory K Davis; Caleb Trujillo; Mark Terry; Donald P French; Rebecca M Price; Kathryn E Perez
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  "Why do we have to learn this stuff?"--a new genetics for 21st century students.

Authors:  Rosemary J Redfield
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  The molecular biology capstone assessment: a concept assessment for upper-division molecular biology students.

Authors:  Brian A Couch; William B Wood; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Development of the Statistical Reasoning in Biology Concept Inventory (SRBCI).

Authors:  Thomas Deane; Kathy Nomme; Erica Jeffery; Carol Pollock; Gülnur Birol
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  How can we improve problem solving in undergraduate biology? Applying lessons from 30 years of physics education research.

Authors:  A-M Hoskinson; M D Caballero; J K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Development of a meiosis concept inventory.

Authors:  Pamela Kalas; Angie O'Neill; Carol Pollock; Gülnur Birol
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Genetics and evolution: an iOS application to supplement introductory courses in transmission and evolutionary genetics.

Authors:  Russell B Myers; Brandon Millman; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.