Literature DB >> 27909016

Using Student Writing and Lexical Analysis to Reveal Student Thinking about the Role of Stop Codons in the Central Dogma.

Luanna B Prevost1, Michelle K Smith2, Jennifer K Knight3.   

Abstract

Previous work has shown that students have persistent difficulties in understanding how central dogma processes can be affected by a stop codon mutation. To explore these difficulties, we modified two multiple-choice questions from the Genetics Concept Assessment into three open-ended questions that asked students to write about how a stop codon mutation potentially impacts replication, transcription, and translation. We then used computer-assisted lexical analysis combined with human scoring to categorize student responses. The lexical analysis models showed high agreement with human scoring, demonstrating that this approach can be successfully used to analyze large numbers of student written responses. The results of this analysis show that students' ideas about one process in the central dogma can affect their thinking about subsequent and previous processes, leading to mixed models of conceptual understanding.
© 2016 L. B. Prevost et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909016      PMCID: PMC5132362          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.15-12-0267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  Using the Genetics Concept Assessment to document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content.

Authors:  Kenna R Mills Shaw; Katie Van Horne; Hubert Zhang; Joann Boughman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith; William B Wood; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI).

Authors:  Kathy Garvin-Doxas; Michael W Klymkowsky
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Applying computerized-scoring models of written biological explanations across courses and colleges: prospects and limitations.

Authors:  Minsu Ha; Ross H Nehm; Mark Urban-Lurain; John E Merrill
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  DNA → RNA: What Do Students Think the Arrow Means?

Authors:  L Kate Wright; J Nick Fisk; Dina L Newman
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.

Authors:  Kevin C Haudek; Luanna B Prevost; Rosa A Moscarella; John Merrill; Mark Urban-Lurain
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  The genetic drift inventory: a tool for measuring what advanced undergraduates have mastered about genetic drift.

Authors:  Rebecca M Price; Tessa C Andrews; Teresa L McElhinny; Louise S Mead; Joel K Abraham; Anna Thanukos; Kathryn E Perez
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Development of a meiosis concept inventory.

Authors:  Pamela Kalas; Angie O'Neill; Carol Pollock; Gülnur Birol
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  8 in total

1.  What Motivates Biology Instructors to Engage and Persist in Teaching Professional Development?

Authors:  Jill S McCourt; Tessa C Andrews; Jennifer K Knight; John E Merrill; Ross H Nehm; Karen N Pelletreau; Luanna B Prevost; Michelle K Smith; Mark Urban-Lurain; Paula P Lemons
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Publishing activities improves undergraduate biology education.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Characterizing Students' Ideas about the Effects of a Mutation in a Noncoding Region of DNA.

Authors:  Scott A Sieke; Betsy B McIntosh; Matthew M Steele; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Successful Problem Solving in Genetics Varies Based on Question Content.

Authors:  Jennifer S Avena; Betsy B McIntosh; Oscar N Whitney; Ashton Wiens; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Student Thinking in the Professional Development of College Biology Instructors: An Analysis through the Lens of Sociocultural Theory.

Authors:  Sophia Jeong; Jakayla Clyburn; Nikhil S Bhatia; Jill McCourt; Paula P Lemons
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  A Faculty Professional Development Model That Improves Student Learning, Encourages Active-Learning Instructional Practices, and Works for Faculty at Multiple Institutions.

Authors:  Karen N Pelletreau; Jennifer K Knight; Paula P Lemons; Jill S McCourt; John E Merrill; Ross H Nehm; Luanna B Prevost; Mark Urban-Lurain; Michelle K Smith
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Through the Eyes of Faculty: Using Personas as a Tool for Learner-Centered Professional Development.

Authors:  Patricia Zagallo; Jill McCourt; Robert Idsardi; Michelle K Smith; Mark Urban-Lurain; Tessa C Andrews; Kevin Haudek; Jennifer K Knight; John Merrill; Ross Nehm; Luanna B Prevost; Paula P Lemons
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Automated Writing Assessments Measure Undergraduate Learning after Completion of a Computer-Based Cellular Respiration Tutorial.

Authors:  Juli D Uhl; Kamali N Sripathi; Eli Meir; John Merrill; Mark Urban-Lurain; Kevin C Haudek
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.