Literature DB >> 18202354

Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates.

Bethany Vice Bowling1, Erin E Acra, Lihshing Wang, Melanie F Myers, Gary E Dean, Glenn C Markle, Christine L Moskalik, Carl A Huether.   

Abstract

There is continued emphasis on increasing and improving genetics education for grades K-12, for medical professionals, and for the general public. Another critical audience is undergraduate students in introductory biology and genetics courses. To improve the learning of genetics, there is a need to first assess students' understanding of genetics concepts and their level of genetics literacy (i.e., genetics knowledge as it relates to, and affects, their lives). We have developed and evaluated a new instrument to assess the genetics literacy of undergraduate students taking introductory biology or genetics courses. The Genetics Literacy Assessment Instrument is a 31-item multiple-choice test that addresses 17 concepts identified as central to genetics literacy. The items were selected and modified on the basis of reviews by 25 genetics professionals and educators. The instrument underwent additional analysis in student focus groups and pilot testing. It has been evaluated using approximately 400 students in eight introductory nonmajor biology and genetics courses. The content validity, discriminant validity, internal reliability, and stability of the instrument have been considered. This project directly enhances genetics education research by providing a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the genetics literacy of undergraduate students.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18202354      PMCID: PMC2206067          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.079533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  6 in total

1.  Bioliteracy and teaching efficacy: what biologists can learn from physicists.

Authors:  Michael W Klymkowsky; Kathy Garvin-Doxas; Michael Zeilik
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2003

2.  Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research.

Authors:  Benjamin R Bates; John A Lynch; Jennifer L Bevan; Celeste M Condit
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Understanding of genetic information in higher secondary students in northeast India and the implications for genetics education.

Authors:  Ansuman Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

4.  Reaching the nonschool public about genetics.

Authors:  S Grinell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts.

Authors:  Angela D Lanie; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Jane P Sheldon; Sharon L R Kardia; Elizabeth S Anderson; Merle Feldbaum; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Education in a genomic world.

Authors:  Joseph McInerney
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2002-06
  6 in total
  64 in total

1.  Using the Genetics Concept Assessment to document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith; William B Wood; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Using Student Writing and Lexical Analysis to Reveal Student Thinking about the Role of Stop Codons in the Central Dogma.

Authors:  Luanna B Prevost; Michelle K Smith; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Kelly F J Stewart; Daša Kokole; Anke Wesselius; Annemie M W J Schols; Maurice P Zeegers; Hein de Vries; Liesbeth A D M van Osch
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Learning Outcomes with Linked Assessments - an Essential Part of our Regular Teaching Practice.

Authors:  Ann C Smith; Gili Marbach-Ad
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2010-12-20

8.  Physician Assistant Genomic Competencies.

Authors:  Constance Goldgar; Ed Michaud; Nguyen Park; Jean Jenkins
Journal:  J Physician Assist Educ       Date:  2016-09

9.  Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The problem of revealing how students think: Concept inventories and beyond.

Authors:  Julia I Smith; Kimberly Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.