Literature DB >> 22362058

Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities.

David Hammond1, James Thrasher, Jessica L Reid, Pete Driezen, Christian Boudreau, Edna Arillo Santillán.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages are a prominent and effective means of communicating the risks of smoking; however, there is little research on effective types of message content and socio-demographic effects. This study tested message themes and content of pictorial warnings in Mexico.
METHODS: Face-to-face surveys were conducted with 544 adult smokers and 528 youth in Mexico City. Participants were randomized to view 5-7 warnings for two of 15 different health effects. Warnings for each health effect included a text-only warning and pictorial warnings with various themes: "graphic" health effects, "lived experience", symbolic images, and testimonials.
RESULTS: Pictorial health warnings were rated as more effective than text-only warnings. Pictorial warnings featuring "graphic" depictions of disease were significantly more effective than symbolic images or experiences of human suffering. Adding testimonial information to warnings increased perceived effectiveness. Adults who were female, older, had lower education, and intended to quit smoking rated warnings as more effective, although the magnitude of these differences was modest. Few interactions were observed between socio-demographics and message theme.
CONCLUSIONS: Graphic depictions of disease were perceived by youth and adults as the most effective warning theme. Perceptions of warnings were generally similar across socio-demographic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22362058      PMCID: PMC4586036          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-9902-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  18 in total

1.  Readability of health warnings on alcohol and tobacco products.

Authors:  J Malouff; D Gabrilowitz; N Schutte
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement.

Authors:  Yvonne Terry-McElrath; Melanie Wakefield; Erin Ruel; George I Balch; Sherry Emery; Glen Szczypka; Katherine Clegg-Smith; Brian Flay
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005-03

3.  The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Romer; Paul Slovic; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Leisha Wharfield; C K Mertz; Stephanie M Carpenter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Melanie C Green; Joseph N Cappella; Michael D Slater; Meg E Wise; Doug Storey; Eddie M Clark; Daniel J O'Keefe; Deborah O Erwin; Kathleen Holmes; Leslie J Hinyard; Thomas Houston; Sabra Woolley
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2007-06

5.  Use of fear-appeal techniques in the design of tailored cancer risk communication messages: implications for healthcare providers.

Authors:  Kevin M Sweet; Sharla K Willis; Sato Ashida; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States.

Authors:  J P Pierce; W S Choi; E A Gilpin; A J Farkas; R K Merritt
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Assessing the impact of cigarette package health warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay and Mexico.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Victor Villalobos; André Szklo; Geoffrey T Fong; Cristina Pérez; Ernesto Sebrié; Natalie Sansone; Valeska Figueiredo; Marcelo Boado; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Eduardo Bianco
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2010

9.  Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Victor Villalobos; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; David Hammond; Jarvis Carter; Ernesto Sebrié; Raul Sansores; Justino Regalado-Piñeda
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups.

Authors:  Sarah J Durkin; Lois Biener; Melanie A Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  76 in total

1.  Predictive and External Validity of a Pre-Market Study to Determine the Most Effective Pictorial Health Warning Label Content for Cigarette Packages.

Authors:  Li-Ling Huang; James F Thrasher; Jessica L Reid; David Hammond
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Examining the relationship between psychosocial and behavioral proxies for future consumption behavior: self-reported impact and bidding behavior in an experimental auction study on cigarette labeling.

Authors:  Matthew C Rousu; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-01-07

3.  Reducing lung cancer and other tobacco-related cancers in Europe: smoking cessation is the key.

Authors:  Luke Clancy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-12-06

4.  Higher negative emotions in response to cigarette pictorial warning labels predict higher quit intentions among smokers.

Authors:  Yachao Li; Bo Yang; Daniel Owusu; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Over-Time Impacts of Pictorial Health Warning Labels and their Differences across Smoker Subgroups: Results from Adult Smokers in Canada and Australia.

Authors:  Kamala Swayampakala; James F Thrasher; Hua-Hie Yong; Gera E Nagelhout; Lin Li; Ron Borland; David Hammond; Richard J O'Connor; James W Hardin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  The role of negative affect and message credibility in perceived effectiveness of smokeless tobacco health warning labels in Navi Mumbai, India and Dhaka, Bangladesh: A moderated-mediation analysis.

Authors:  Seema Mutti-Packer; Jessica L Reid; James F Thrasher; Daniel Romer; Geoffrey T Fong; Prakash C Gupta; Mangesh S Pednekar; Nigar Nargis; David Hammond
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Pictorial health warning label content and smokers' understanding of smoking-related risks-a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Kamala Swayampakala; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Hua-Hie Yong; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Dean Krugman; Abraham Brown; Ron Borland; James Hardin
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-05-21

8.  Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Matthew J Carpenter; Jeannette O Andrews; Kevin M Gray; Anthony J Alberg; Ashley Navarro; Daniela B Friedman; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Effectiveness of health warnings for waterpipe tobacco smoking among college students.

Authors:  Farahnaz Islam; Ramzi G Salloum; Rima Nakkash; Wasim Maziak; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Cigarette package inserts can promote efficacy beliefs and sustained smoking cessation attempts: A longitudinal assessment of an innovative policy in Canada.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Kamala Swayampakala; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; Dien Anshari; Dean M Krugman; James W Hardin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.