Literature DB >> 28637294

Over-Time Impacts of Pictorial Health Warning Labels and their Differences across Smoker Subgroups: Results from Adult Smokers in Canada and Australia.

Kamala Swayampakala1, James F Thrasher1,2, Hua-Hie Yong3, Gera E Nagelhout4,5, Lin Li3, Ron Borland3, David Hammond6, Richard J O'Connor7, James W Hardin8.   

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines patterns of change in different smoker subgroups' responses to new pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) over the initial, two year post-implementation period in Canada, where HWLs include package inserts with cessation messages, and Australia, where "plain" packaging (i.e., prohibition of brand imagery) was also implemented.
Methods: Data were collected from online consumer panels in Canada (nsmokers = 3153; nobservations = 5826) and Australia (nsmokers = 2699; nobservations = 5818) from September 2012 to September 2014, with approximately 1000 adult smokers surveyed in each country every four months, using replenishment to maintain sample size. Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equation models where main effects and interactions among time, country, and socio-demographic factors on HWL responses (i.e., attention to HWLs; cognitive and behavioral responses to HWLs) were examined.
Results: Over time, attention to HWLs declined but cognitive and forgoing responses to HWLs increased, in both Canada and Australia. In both countries, compared to smokers with low income and/or education, smokers with high income and/or education showed an increase over time in attention and cognitive responses to HWLs (p < .05). In Australia only, compared to older smokers, younger smokers showed less decline over time in attention and greater increase in cognitive and forgoing responses to HWLs (p < .001). Conclusions: Novel HWL policies in Canada and Australia appear effective in staving off "wear out" over the first 2 years after implementation, particularly amongst smokers who are from higher SES groups and, in Australia, who are younger. Implications: Previous research shows that the effects of health warning label (HWL) on smokers decline over time, but no studies to date have evaluated whether trends differ across socio-demographic groups. This study suggests that innovative policy configurations that combine prominent pictorial HWLs with inserts (Canada) and with "plain" packaging (Australia) may delay wear out over the first 2 years after implementation. While this study found evidence for wear out in attention to HWLs, other HWL responses (cognitive responses, forgoing cigarettes) actually increased over time, with greater increases amongst smokers with higher income and/or education.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28637294      PMCID: PMC5991213          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  33 in total

1.  Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Pete Driezen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Pictorial health warning label content and smokers' understanding of smoking-related risks-a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Kamala Swayampakala; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Hua-Hie Yong; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Dean Krugman; Abraham Brown; Ron Borland; James Hardin
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-05-21

3.  Cancer knowledge and disparities in the information age.

Authors:  K Viswanath; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Richard P Moser; Bradford Hesse; Whitney Randolph Steele; William Rakowski
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

4.  Effectiveness of the European Union text-only cigarette health warnings: findings from four countries.

Authors:  Sara C Hitchman; Ute Mons; Gera E Nagelhout; Romain Guignard; Ann Mcneill; Marc C Willemsen; Pete Driezen; Jean-Louis Wilquin; François Beck; Enguerrand Du-Roscöat; Martina Pötschke-Langer; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  [Towards informed tobacco consumption in Mexico: effect of pictorial warning labels in smokers].

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2012-06

6.  How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey.

Authors:  Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Nick Wilson; Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; K Michael Cummings; Warwick Hosking; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Matthew J Carpenter; Jeannette O Andrews; Kevin M Gray; Anthony J Alberg; Ashley Navarro; Daniela B Friedman; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Cigarette package inserts can promote efficacy beliefs and sustained smoking cessation attempts: A longitudinal assessment of an innovative policy in Canada.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Kamala Swayampakala; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; Dien Anshari; Dean M Krugman; James W Hardin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Australian adult smokers' responses to plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings 1 year after implementation: results from a national cross-sectional tracking survey.

Authors:  Melanie Wakefield; Kerri Coomber; Meghan Zacher; Sarah Durkin; Emily Brennan; Michelle Scollo
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Impact of tobacco-related health warning labels across socioeconomic, race and ethnic groups: results from a randomized web-based experiment.

Authors:  Jennifer Cantrell; Donna M Vallone; James F Thrasher; Rebekah H Nagler; Shari P Feirman; Larry R Muenz; David Y He; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Do graphic health warning labels on cigarette packages deter purchases at point-of-sale? An experiment with adult smokers.

Authors:  William G Shadel; Steven C Martino; Claude M Setodji; Michael Dunbar; Deborah Scharf; Kasey G Creswell
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2019-06-01

2.  Trajectories of Responses to Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings.

Authors:  Humberto Parada; Marissa G Hall; Marcella H Boynton; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Health Warnings on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Simulation of Impacts on Diet and Obesity Among U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Natalie R Smith; Shelley D Golden; Leah Frerichs; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Evaluating the impact of plain packaging among Canadian smokers: findings from the 2018 and 2020 ITC Smoking and Vaping Surveys.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Janet Chung-Hall; Lorraine V Craig; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Ruth Loewen; Nadia Martin; Anne C K Quah; David Hammond; Janine Ouimet; Christian Boudreau; Mary E Thompson; Pete Driezen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 6.953

5.  Health Warnings and Beverage Purchase Behavior: Mediators of Impact.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-09-01

6.  Strategies to enhance the effects of pictorial warnings for cigarettes: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Farahnaz Islam; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Rosibel Rodriguez-Bolaños; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James W Hardin; Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Effects of pictorial warning label message framing and standardized packaging on cigarette packaging appeal among young adult smokers.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; George Luta; Kenneth P Tercyak; Raymond S Niaura; Darren Mays
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.591

8.  Awareness of and reactions to the health harms of sugary drinks: An online study of U.S. parents.

Authors:  Alexandra E Carl; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Anna H Grummon; Allison J Lazard; Isabella C A Higgins; Jennifer Mendel Sheldon; Marissa G Hall
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 5.016

9.  Do pictorial health warnings on waterpipe tobacco packs matter? Recall effectiveness among Egyptian waterpipe smokers & non-smokers.

Authors:  Aya Mostafa; Heba Tallah Mohammed; Rasha Saad Hussein; Wafaa Mohamed Hussein; Mahmoud Elhabiby; Wael Safwat; Sahar Labib; Aisha Aboul Fotouh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Informing tobacco control policy in Jordan: assessing the effectiveness of pictorial warning labels on cigarette packs.

Authors:  Rasha K Bader; Rawan A Shihab; Dalia H Al-Rimawi; Feras I Hawari
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.